Study Stopped
The study was terminated early due to slow enrollment and difficulties with long-term follow-up
Comparison of Complication Rates Between Lateral Approaches to the Lumbar Spine
RAVINE
A Comparison of Complication Rates Between Lateral Approaches to the Lumbar Spine: K2M RAVINE® Far Lateral System Versus NuVasive XLIF®
1 other identifier
observational
131
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
An evaluation of the incidence of complications resulting from far lateral spine surgery utilizing the K2M RAVINE® Lateral Access System (RAVINE) with ALEUTIAN® Lateral Interbody Spacer System versus literature reported results for the NuVasive XLIF® system (XLIF) in the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2014
Longer than P75 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 11, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 5, 2021
CompletedApril 5, 2021
April 1, 2021
5.3 years
February 11, 2014
November 30, 2020
April 2, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Change From Baseline
Evaluation of the change of the Back VAS, Hip VAS and the Leg VAS at the 24 month post-operative visit as compared to pre-op time periods. Information on all reports of pain/numbness/tingling and the location of symptoms were captured and evaluated. VAS scale ranged from 0 - 10cm with the 10cm accounting for the highest level of pain.
24 months
Number of Patients With Adverse Events AEs)
The evaluation of all adverse events including device related, procedure related and additional serious adverse events.
Operative to 24 month
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Change in Pain/Dysesthesia Score From Baseline (Pre-Operative)
time of discharge, an average of 4.5 days, up to 8 weeks post-operatively, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Change in Oswestry Disability Index From Baseline (Pre-Operative)
time of discharge, an average of 4.5 days, up to 8 weeks post-operatively, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life From Baseline (Pre-op)
time of discharge, an average of 4.5 days, up to 8 weeks post-operatively, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Radiographic Assessments
12 mo to 24 mo
Patient Satisfaction
12 month and 24 month
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Eligibility Criteria
Patients eligible for study enrollment will have a primary diagnoses limited to degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at L2-S1 requiring surgical intervention at one or two contiguous levels. Qualified patients will have confirmed failure of conservative therapy as well as plain film imaging studies. Subjects must be ≥ 18 years old at the time of enrollment.
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of DDD with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis, confirmed clinically and radiographically, requiring surgical intervention at one or two contiguous levels between L2-S1
- Inadequate response to conservative medical care over a period of at least 6 months
- Willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol including follow-up requirements
- Willing and able to sign a study specific informed consent
- Skeletally mature and ≥ 18 years of age at the time of enrollment
You may not qualify if:
- Previous anterior/posterior/lateral spine surgery at the index level
- Previous posterior/lateral spine surgery (e.g., posterior element decompression) that destabilizes the lumbar spine
- Active systemic infection or infection at the operative site
- Co-morbid medical conditions of the spine or upper/lower extremities that may affect the lumbar spine neurological and/or pain assessment
- Metabolic bone disease such as osteoporosis that contradicts spinal surgery
- History of an osteoporotic fracture
- History of an endocrine or metabolic disorder (e.g., Paget's disease) known to affect bone and mineral metabolism
- Taking medications that may interfere with bony/soft tissue healing including chronic steroid use
- Known allergy to titanium, cobalt chrome or PEEK
- Rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune disease or a systemic disorder such as HIV, active hepatitis B or C or fibromyalgia
- Current medical condition (e.g., unstable cardiac disease, cancer) that may result in patient death or have an effect on outcomes prior to study completion
- Pregnant, or intend to become pregnant, during the course of the study
- Severe obesity (Body Mass Index \> 40)
- Physical or mental condition (e.g., psychiatric disorder, senile dementia, Alzheimer's disease, alcohol or drug addiction) that would interfere with patient self-assessment of function, pain or quality of life
- Involved in current or pending spinal litigation where permanent disability benefits are being sought
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- K2M, Inc.lead
Related Publications (4)
Malham GM, Ellis NJ, Parker RM, Seex KA. Clinical outcome and fusion rates after the first 30 extreme lateral interbody fusions. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:246989. doi: 10.1100/2012/246989. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
PMID: 23213282BACKGROUNDCaputo AM, Michael KW, Chapman TM Jr, Massey GM, Howes CR, Isaacs RE, Brown CR. Clinical outcomes of extreme lateral interbody fusion in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:680643. doi: 10.1100/2012/680643. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
PMID: 23049476BACKGROUNDYoussef JA, McAfee PC, Patty CA, Raley E, DeBauche S, Shucosky E, Chotikul L. Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 15;35(26 Suppl):S302-11. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182023438.
PMID: 21160394BACKGROUNDBerjano P, Balsano M, Buric J, Petruzzi M, Lamartina C. Direct lateral access lumbar and thoracolumbar fusion: preliminary results. Eur Spine J. 2012 May;21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S37-42. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2217-z. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
PMID: 22402840BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Early termination leading to small numbers of subjects analyzed.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Marissa Conrad, Senior Director of Clinical and Medical Affairs
- Organization
- Stryker Spine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 11, 2014
First Posted
February 21, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 11, 2019
Study Completion
February 28, 2020
Last Updated
April 5, 2021
Results First Posted
April 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04