Comparison Among Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents
Erythropoietins in Management of Anemia of End Stage Renal Disease: A Prospective Study From Qatar.
1 other identifier
interventional
327
1 country
1
Brief Summary
\* Background: Despite extensive use, to the best of our knowledge, no trial has simultaneously compared the three currently used erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs) in a prospective manner, in treatment of anemia of end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. \* Patients and Methods: All haemodialysis patients in Qatar who were treated with short acting Epoetin alfa or beta were screened. Eligible patients were randomized, either to continue on the previous regimen of Epoetin, or to receive Darbepoetin alfa or continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A) for a total period of 40 weeks. All groups were assessed at the end of the study for safety and efficacy parameters.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Mar 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2014
CompletedSeptember 13, 2017
January 1, 2014
1.1 years
January 22, 2014
September 12, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of efficacy among erythropoetin stimulating agents.
To evaluate efficacy of continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) and Darbepoetin Alfa, to maintain Hemoglobin level - within the target recommended range - among ESRD patients, in direct comparison to currently available ESA (Epoetin alfa and beta). by measuring percentage of cases with mean Hemoglobin concentration between 11-12 gm/dl and measuring mean monthly hemoglobin concentrations.
Every week up to 36 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
comparison between safety profile of different types of erythropoetin simulating agents.
Up 36 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Epoetin alpha or beta (Epoetin group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in that arm were continued on the previous same dose and route of administration of Epoetin alpha/ beta (Epoetin group).
Darbepoetin alpha
ACTIVE COMPARATORsubjects in that group received Darbepoetin alfa once every week or every 2 weeks as per protocol.
Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta
EXPERIMENTALPatients in that arm received Intravenous Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta monthly.
Interventions
Erythropoetin doses in that were adjusted according to the approved prescribing information, without additional restrictions. Doses of erythropoetin were decreased by 25% for Hb values \>12 and ≤13 g/dL and increased by 25% for Hb \<11 and ≥10 g/dL. erythropoetin doses were increased by 50% for Hb \<10 g/dL. Treatment was interrupted temporarily if Hb exceeds 13 g/dL. The doses for all patients were adjusted so that haemoglobin concentrations were maintained within a target range of 11-12 g/dL during the study.
Subjects in that group received Darbepoetin alfa once every week or every 2 weeks as per protocol. Doses of Darbepoetin alfa were decreased by 25% for Hb values \>12 and ≤13 g/dL and increased by 25% for Hb \<11 and ≥10 g/dL. Darbepoetin alfa doses and increased by 50% for Hb \<10 g/dL. Treatment was interrupted temporarily if Hb exceeds 13 g/dL. The doses were adjusted so that haemoglobin concentrations were remain within a target range of 11-12 g/dL during the study. If a dose of Epoetin alpha/ beta does not equate exactly to a unit dose of Darbepoetin alfa at switching, then the nearest available unit dose of Darbepoetin alfa was used.
Patients in that arm received Intravenous MIRCERA monthly. The initial dose was 120 mcg, 200 mcg or 360 mcg, for patients had previously received a weekly dose of Epoetin alpha/ beta of less than 8000 IU, between 8000 to16 000 IU or more than16000IU respectively. MIRCERA doses were adjusted according to the approved prescribing information, without additional restrictions. Doses of MIRCERA were decreased by 25% for Hb values \>12 and ≤13 g/dL and increased by 25% for Hb \<11 and ≥10 g/dL. MIRCERA doses were increased by 50% for Hb \<10 g/dL. Treatment was interrupted temporarily if Hb exceeds 13 g/dL. The doses of MIRCERA were adjusted so that haemoglobin concentrations were maintained within a target range of 11-12 g/dL during the study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged ≥18 years
- have stable chronic renal anemia (with hemoglobin range of 10-12 g/dL) and on regular haemodialysis 3 x week with urea reduction ratio greater or equal to 65% or KT/V ( K - dialyzer clearance of urea, t - dialysis time, V - volume of distribution of urea, approximately equal to patient's total body water) greater or equal to 1.2.
- Patients must have received haemodialysis three times weekly for ≥12 weeks before screening and during the 4-week screening/baseline period.
- Eligible patients must have stable hemoglobin concentrations (stable is defined as ≤25% change in weekly dose of ESA over 8 weeks).
- Recruited patients must have undergone continuous maintenance intravenous conventional Epoetin alpha or beta therapy for ≥8 weeks before screening and during the screening/baseline.
- Patients should have adequate iron status, defined as serum ferritin ≥100 μg/L and transferrin saturation ≥20%.
You may not qualify if:
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV congestive heart failure
- Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as pre-dialysis diastolic blood pressure
- mmHg or systolic BP≥ 160 mmHg during the screening period)
- Evidence of uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism (defined as parathyroid hormone level \>1000 pg/ml with no response to conventional treatment of hyperparathyroidism according to Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guide line during the 12 months prior to baseline)
- Treatment for grand mal epilepsy
- Haematological, inflammatory or infectious conditions that might interfere with the erythropoietin response
- Received red blood cell transfusions within 12 weeks before screening or during the screening/baseline period.
- reactive protein \>30 mg/L
- The likelihood of early withdrawal; or life expectancy of \<12 months
- Poor compliance with dialysis treatment, evidenced by \>2 missed treatment monthly over the previous 3 months10. Refuse to be involved in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fahd Bin Jassem Dialysis Centre
Doha, 30550, Qatar
Related Publications (1)
Chung EY, Palmer SC, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Tonelli M, Strippoli GF. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 13;2(2):CD010590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010590.pub3.
PMID: 36791280DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fadwa S. AL-Ali, MD
Hamad Medical Corporation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2014
First Posted
January 30, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
April 1, 2013
Study Completion
June 1, 2013
Last Updated
September 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2014-01