NCT02049346

Brief Summary

\* Background: Despite extensive use, to the best of our knowledge, no trial has simultaneously compared the three currently used erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs) in a prospective manner, in treatment of anemia of end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. \* Patients and Methods: All haemodialysis patients in Qatar who were treated with short acting Epoetin alfa or beta were screened. Eligible patients were randomized, either to continue on the previous regimen of Epoetin, or to receive Darbepoetin alfa or continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A) for a total period of 40 weeks. All groups were assessed at the end of the study for safety and efficacy parameters.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
327

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2012

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2012

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2013

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 22, 2014

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 30, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

September 13, 2017

Status Verified

January 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

January 22, 2014

Last Update Submit

September 12, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

AnemiaHemodialysisErythropoetin Stimulating AgentsComparison

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Comparison of efficacy among erythropoetin stimulating agents.

    To evaluate efficacy of continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) and Darbepoetin Alfa, to maintain Hemoglobin level - within the target recommended range - among ESRD patients, in direct comparison to currently available ESA (Epoetin alfa and beta). by measuring percentage of cases with mean Hemoglobin concentration between 11-12 gm/dl and measuring mean monthly hemoglobin concentrations.

    Every week up to 36 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • comparison between safety profile of different types of erythropoetin simulating agents.

    Up 36 weeks

Study Arms (3)

Epoetin alpha or beta (Epoetin group)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in that arm were continued on the previous same dose and route of administration of Epoetin alpha/ beta (Epoetin group).

Drug: Epoetin alpha or beta (Epoetin group)

Darbepoetin alpha

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

subjects in that group received Darbepoetin alfa once every week or every 2 weeks as per protocol.

Drug: Darbepoetin alfa

Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in that arm received Intravenous Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta monthly.

Drug: Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta

Interventions

Erythropoetin doses in that were adjusted according to the approved prescribing information, without additional restrictions. Doses of erythropoetin were decreased by 25% for Hb values \>12 and ≤13 g/dL and increased by 25% for Hb \<11 and ≥10 g/dL. erythropoetin doses were increased by 50% for Hb \<10 g/dL. Treatment was interrupted temporarily if Hb exceeds 13 g/dL. The doses for all patients were adjusted so that haemoglobin concentrations were maintained within a target range of 11-12 g/dL during the study.

Also known as: Recormon, Eprex
Epoetin alpha or beta (Epoetin group)

Subjects in that group received Darbepoetin alfa once every week or every 2 weeks as per protocol. Doses of Darbepoetin alfa were decreased by 25% for Hb values \>12 and ≤13 g/dL and increased by 25% for Hb \<11 and ≥10 g/dL. Darbepoetin alfa doses and increased by 50% for Hb \<10 g/dL. Treatment was interrupted temporarily if Hb exceeds 13 g/dL. The doses were adjusted so that haemoglobin concentrations were remain within a target range of 11-12 g/dL during the study. If a dose of Epoetin alpha/ beta does not equate exactly to a unit dose of Darbepoetin alfa at switching, then the nearest available unit dose of Darbepoetin alfa was used.

Also known as: Aranesp
Darbepoetin alpha

Patients in that arm received Intravenous MIRCERA monthly. The initial dose was 120 mcg, 200 mcg or 360 mcg, for patients had previously received a weekly dose of Epoetin alpha/ beta of less than 8000 IU, between 8000 to16 000 IU or more than16000IU respectively. MIRCERA doses were adjusted according to the approved prescribing information, without additional restrictions. Doses of MIRCERA were decreased by 25% for Hb values \>12 and ≤13 g/dL and increased by 25% for Hb \<11 and ≥10 g/dL. MIRCERA doses were increased by 50% for Hb \<10 g/dL. Treatment was interrupted temporarily if Hb exceeds 13 g/dL. The doses of MIRCERA were adjusted so that haemoglobin concentrations were maintained within a target range of 11-12 g/dL during the study.

Also known as: MIRCERA
Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged ≥18 years
  • have stable chronic renal anemia (with hemoglobin range of 10-12 g/dL) and on regular haemodialysis 3 x week with urea reduction ratio greater or equal to 65% or KT/V ( K - dialyzer clearance of urea, t - dialysis time, V - volume of distribution of urea, approximately equal to patient's total body water) greater or equal to 1.2.
  • Patients must have received haemodialysis three times weekly for ≥12 weeks before screening and during the 4-week screening/baseline period.
  • Eligible patients must have stable hemoglobin concentrations (stable is defined as ≤25% change in weekly dose of ESA over 8 weeks).
  • Recruited patients must have undergone continuous maintenance intravenous conventional Epoetin alpha or beta therapy for ≥8 weeks before screening and during the screening/baseline.
  • Patients should have adequate iron status, defined as serum ferritin ≥100 μg/L and transferrin saturation ≥20%.

You may not qualify if:

  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV congestive heart failure
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as pre-dialysis diastolic blood pressure
  • mmHg or systolic BP≥ 160 mmHg during the screening period)
  • Evidence of uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism (defined as parathyroid hormone level \>1000 pg/ml with no response to conventional treatment of hyperparathyroidism according to Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guide line during the 12 months prior to baseline)
  • Treatment for grand mal epilepsy
  • Haematological, inflammatory or infectious conditions that might interfere with the erythropoietin response
  • Received red blood cell transfusions within 12 weeks before screening or during the screening/baseline period.
  • reactive protein \>30 mg/L
  • The likelihood of early withdrawal; or life expectancy of \<12 months
  • Poor compliance with dialysis treatment, evidenced by \>2 missed treatment monthly over the previous 3 months10. Refuse to be involved in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fahd Bin Jassem Dialysis Centre

Doha, 30550, Qatar

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Chung EY, Palmer SC, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Tonelli M, Strippoli GF. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 13;2(2):CD010590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010590.pub3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anemia

Interventions

epoetin betaEpoetin AlfaDarbepoetin alfacontinuous erythropoietin receptor activator

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ErythropoietinColony-Stimulating FactorsGlycoproteinsGlycoconjugatesCarbohydratesHematopoietic Cell Growth FactorsCytokinesIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsProteinsBiological Factors

Study Officials

  • Fadwa S. AL-Ali, MD

    Hamad Medical Corporation

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2014

First Posted

January 30, 2014

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion

April 1, 2013

Study Completion

June 1, 2013

Last Updated

September 13, 2017

Record last verified: 2014-01

Locations