Cost Comparison Study of Darbepoetin Versus Epoetin Therapy to Treat Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Costs Associated With Anemia Therapy in Hemodialysis Patients Treated With Intravenous Darbepoetin Alfa Versus Epoetin Alfa
1 other identifier
interventional
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a cost difference between darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa when used intravenously to treat anemia in hemodialysis patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Sep 2010
Typical duration for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 10, 2019
CompletedSeptember 10, 2019
August 1, 2019
2.7 years
June 27, 2016
July 16, 2019
August 16, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cost of Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent
total cost over 12 months in Canadian dollars
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Hemoglobin
12 months
Ferritin
12 months
Transferrin Saturation (TSAT)
12 months
Iron Dose
12 months
Iron Cost
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Epoetin alfa
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients who are enrolled and randomized to the Epoetin arm will remain on their current dose and frequency. After the first hemoglobin (Hb) measurement the study algorithm will be used to guide anemia management. The subjects in this arm will remain on epoetin for the required run-in phase followed by the 12 month active phase.
Darbepoetin alfa
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients who are enrolled and randomized to the Darbepoetin arm will have their epoetin discontinued at the end of the week preceding entry into the study and will switch to darbepoetin on the date that they would normally be receiving their next dose of epoetin. Switching patients to darbepoetin will be done using the conversion ratio of 200 units of epoetin to 1 μg of darbepoetin as used per week, rounded up or down to the nearest available pre-filled syringe dose available from the manufacturer. After the first Hb measurement the study algorithm will be used to guide anemia management. The subjects in this arm will remain on darbepoetin for the required run-in phase followed by the 12 month active phase.
Interventions
The investigator will adjust epoetin doses as per the study algorithm during the run-in (every two weeks) and active phases (every four weeks). This will continue until the 12 month active phase is complete or the patient is withdrawn from the study. All epoetin will be administered intravenously through a hemodialysis machine port using a manufacturer-provided pre-filled syringe. It is not anticipated that a subject will require a dose of epoetin \> 30 000 units weekly. If this occurs the dose will not be escalated any higher. Such a patient would likely meet the criteria for study withdrawal. Intravenous iron will be given as per the study algorithm and only one formulation of iron is used, sodium ferric gluconate.
The investigator will adjust darbepoetin doses as per the study algorithm during the run-in (every two weeks) and active phases(every four weeks). This will continue until the 12 month active phase is complete or the patient is withdrawn from the study. All darbepoetin will be administered intravenously through a hemodialysis machine port using a manufacturer-provided pre-filled syringe. It is not anticipated that a subject will require a dose of darbepoetin \>150µg weekly. If this occurs the dose will not be escalated any higher. Such a patient would likely meet the criteria for study withdrawal. Intravenous iron will be given as per the study algorithm and only one formulation of iron is used, sodium ferric gluconate.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age ≥19 years
- receiving in-center hemodialysis two or more times weekly
- anemia requiring erythropoiesis stimulating (ESA) agent therapy OR a hemoglobin(Hb)\<100g/L in the absence of other causes of anemia
- if female, must be using an approved method of contraception or judged unable to become pregnant
- able to give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- acute kidney injury likely to resolve
- plans to change to peritoneal dialysis or home hemodialysis, or planned transplant from a living donor
- expected lifespan of less than six months due to a medical condition other than chronic kidney disease
- current hematologic condition that may cause anemia
- use of medications known to cause anemia
- use of any investigational drug or androgen within 90 days of screening
- significant bleeding within 30 days of screening
- red blood cell transfusion(s) within 30 days of screening
- documented or suspected pure red cell aplasia (PRCA)
- current iron deficiency
- documented allergy or intolerance to intravenous sodium ferric gluconate
- known or probable ESA resistance
- uncontrolled hypertension
- an intention to relocate to a different dialysis center in the near future
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Chung EY, Palmer SC, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Tonelli M, Strippoli GF. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 13;2(2):CD010590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010590.pub3.
PMID: 36791280DERIVEDWoodland AL, Murphy SW, Curtis BM, Barrett BJ. Costs Associated With Intravenous Darbepoetin Versus Epoetin Therapy in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2017 Jun 30;4:2054358117716461. doi: 10.1177/2054358117716461. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28717516DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Did not recruit planned number, incomplete follow up in 8 subjects, cannot be generalized to centres without pre-defined dosing algorithms, non-dialysis CKD, or sc administration of ESAs. Trial looked at drug acquisition cost only.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Andrea Woodland
- Organization
- Eastern Health
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrea L Woodland, BScPharm,MSc
Eastern Health, Canada
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Pharmacist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2016
First Posted
June 29, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
September 10, 2019
Results First Posted
September 10, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share