Comparison of Two Thoracic Manipulation Techniques to Improve Neck Pain
A Comparison of Two Thoracic Manipulation Techniques to Improve Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is designed to compare the short-term effects of two different thoracic spine thrust manipulation techniques on neck range-of-motion, pain, and self-reported disability in people with neck pain. The null hypothesis is that there will be no differences between the two manipulation techniques for short-term effects on neck range-of-motion, pain, and self-reported disability in people with neck pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 8, 2015
CompletedNovember 9, 2018
November 1, 2018
8 months
September 17, 2014
November 7, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Patient-rated assessment of pain on scale of 0-10
Baseline (Week 0)
NPRS
Patient-rating of pain on a scale of 0-10
Change from Week 0 to Week 1
NPRS
Patient-rating of pain on a scale of 0-10
Change from Baseline (Week 0) and Follow-up (Week 3) and From Week 1 and Week 3
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
10 Question patient-rated outcome measures specific to neck disability
Baseline (Week 0)
NDI
10 Question patient-rated outcome measures specific to neck disability
Change from Baseline (Week 0) to Week 1
NDI
10 Question patient-rated outcome measures specific to neck disability
Change from Baseline (Week 0) to Follow-up (Week 3) and from Week 1 to Week 3
Shortened Version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH)
11 item patient-rated outcome measure related to disability in the upper extremity with optional work and sport modules.
Baseline (Week 0)
QuickDASH
11 item patient-rated outcome measure related to disability in the upper extremity with optional work and sport modules.
Change from Week 0 to Week 1
QuickDASH
11 item patient-rated outcome measure related to disability in the upper extremity with optional work and sport modules.
Change from Baseline (Week 0) to Follow-up (Week 3) and from Week 1 to Week 3
Neck Range of Motion (ROM)
Cervical rotation and lateral flexion measured with goniometer.
Baseline (Week 0)
Neck ROM
Cervical rotation and lateral flexion measured with goniometer.
Change from Baseline (Week 0) to Week 1
Neck ROM
Cervical rotation and lateral flexion measured with goniometer.
Change from Baseline (Week 0) to Follow-up (Week 3) and between Week 1 and Week 3
Study Arms (2)
Supine Thoracic Spine Manipulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORSupine (lying face-up on the treatment table) thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be given 2 times at 3 treatment sessions (Weeks 0, 1, and 2)
Prone Thoracic Spine Manipulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORProne (lying face down on the treatment table) thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be given 2 times at 3 treatment sessions (Weeks 0, 1, and 2).
Interventions
Position patient so that small amplitude quick stretch can be applied to the least mobile area of the thoracic spine that is identified during the spinal segmental mobility testing. The thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be applied at an appropriate range of motion as identified by the clinician.
Position patient so that small amplitude quick stretch can be applied to the least mobile area of the thoracic spine that is identified during the spinal segmental mobility testing. The thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be applied at an appropriate range of motion as identified by the clinician.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Between 22 and 50 years of age
- Primary complaint of neck pain with or without symptoms that spread down into one arm
- Overall rating of neck pain intensity is at least 3/10; the overall rating is the overall average of the participant's rating of current, least, and worst pain experienced over the previous 24 hours on separate numeric pain rating scales where 0 corresponds to "no pain" and 10 corresponds to "worst pain possible".
- Neck Disability Index (NDI) score \> 10 points (measure of self-reported disability with a 0 to 50 point scale where higher scores indicate higher levels of disability).
- Proficient in speaking and reading English to complete outcome questionnaires
You may not qualify if:
- Neck pain related to a motor vehicle accident or other trauma within the previous 6 weeks
- Neck pain that spreads down into both arms
- Low back pain or thoracic origin of pain
- Nerve root involvement; defined as the presence of two or more neurological findings (e.g. decreased strength, diminished deep tendon reflex, or decreased sensation) at the same nerve root level
- Diagnosis of cervical spine stenosis (narrowing of the central canal that contains the spinal cord)
- History of spinal tumors, spinal infection, cervical spine fracture, or previous neck surgery
- Pending legal action related to current episode of neck pain
- Contraindications to thoracic spine thrust manipulation
- serious pathologies or conditions (tumor, fracture, metabolic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, history of prolonged steroid use)
- hyperreflexia
- unsteadiness during gait
- Nystagmus
- Loss of visual acuity
- Impaired sensation of the face
- Altered taste
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
A.T. Still University
Mesa, Arizona, 85206, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Heick, PT, DPT
A.T. Still University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2014
First Posted
September 19, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
April 30, 2015
Study Completion
July 8, 2015
Last Updated
November 9, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share