Post Operative Pain Control: Morphine vs Fentanyl
Post Operative Pain Control: Continuous Infusion of Morphine vs Fentanyl. Clinical Outcomes
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim of this study is to compare benefits and disadvantages in using continuous infusion of morphine or fentanyl for post operative analgesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2012
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 26, 2014
CompletedMay 26, 2014
May 1, 2014
5 months
January 10, 2013
May 21, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
pain scores
data were recorded at 1,6,18 and 24 hours after surgery
data were recorded during the 24 post operative hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
analgesic requirements
during the 24 hours after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Morphine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received morphine 0.02 mg/Kg/h infused at 2 ml/h for 24 hours. The infusion contained morphine and saline.
Fentanyl
EXPERIMENTALPatients received Fentanyl 0.3 mcg/Kg/h infused at 2 ml/h for 24 hours. The infusion contained morphine and saline.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA 1 or 2 patients
- undergoing major gynaecological surgery
You may not qualify if:
- age \> 60 years
- obesity (BMI\>30 Kg/m2)
- cardiac and respiratory diseases
- renal impairment
- liver disorders
- allergies to any drug used in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
catholic University of the sacred Heart
Rome, Rome, 00168, Italy
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- medical doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2013
First Posted
May 26, 2014
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 1, 2012
Study Completion
September 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 26, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05