Tubeless Versus Standard Upper Pole Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Comparison of Complications Between Patients Undergoing Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Nephrostomy Tube Placement and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Double J Stent Only Placement
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Comparison of complications between standard upper pole percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with nephrostomy placement and double J stent and PCNL with double J placement only without nephrostomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 15, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 7, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 7, 2017
CompletedNovember 28, 2018
November 1, 2018
4.3 years
January 10, 2014
November 26, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants with pleural effusion
Assessment and comparison of pleural effusion incidence between patients in both groups
30 days
Study Arms (2)
Nephrostomy tube + double J stent
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard therapy group with nephrostomy tube and double J stent left at the end of the PCNL
Double J stent without nephrostomy
EXPERIMENTALDouble J stent only left at the end of the procedure
Interventions
Double J stent only left at the end of the procedure without placement of a nephrostomy tube
Double J stent and nephrostomy tube left at end of procedure
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing upper pole percutaneous nephrolithotomy older than 18 years of age and willing to participate
You may not qualify if:
- Patients younger than 18 years of age
- Patients unwilling to participate in the study
- Patients that nephrostomy tube placement was a prerequisite at the end of the procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Urology department, Rabin Medical Center
Petach Tiqva, 49100, Israel
Related Publications (1)
Goldberg H, Nevo A, Shtabholtz Y, Lubin M, Baniel J, Margel D, Ehrlich Y, Lifshitz D. Tubeless supra-costal percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with significantly less hydrothorax: a prospective randomized clinical study. BJU Int. 2020 Feb;125(2):276-283. doi: 10.1111/bju.14950. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
PMID: 31721407DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hanan Goldberg, MD
Rabin Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2014
First Posted
January 15, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
April 7, 2017
Study Completion
April 7, 2017
Last Updated
November 28, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11