Mini Thoracoscopy vs Semirigid Thoracoscopy in Exudative Pleural Effusions
MIST
Rigid 'Mini-thoracoscopy' vs Semirigid Thoracoscopy in Undiagnosed Exudative Pleural Effusions : A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
73
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Undiagnosed pleural effusion is a diagnostic dilemma especially in exudative pleural effusions (EPE). 20-40 % are unable to be attributed to a specific diagnosis, even after thoracentesis and closed pleural biopsy. Thoracoscopy has been demonstrated to increase the diagnostic yield in undiagnosed EPE. The diagnostic yield of thoracoscopy in malignant and TB pleural effusion ranges from 91% to 94% and 93% to 100%, respectively. Rigid thoracoscopy has traditionally been the modality of choice. The recently introduced semirigid thoracoscope provides ease of handling like a flexible bronchoscope. However, there are concerns about the diagnostic yield of semi-rigid thoracoscopy when compared with rigid thoracoscopy. According to the available literature, the yield of semirigid and rigid thoracoscopy is almost similar if adequate pleural biopsy is obtained. However there are concerns that with semi-rigid thoracoscope, there might be greater incidence of inability to obtain adequate pleural biopsy. On the other hand, the use of conventional rigid thoracoscope may be associated with greater procedure related pain.Mini-Thoracoscopy is a newer rigid thoracoscopy instrument which is smaller in diameter (5.5 mm) and may allow pleural biopsy with a smaller incision. There is scant literature on its utility. The investigators hereby propose to undertake a randomized comparison of rigid 'mini thoracoscope' vs semi rigid thoracoscope in undiagnosed pleural effusions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2018
CompletedDecember 27, 2018
December 1, 2018
2.1 years
May 1, 2016
December 25, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic Yield
Proportion of diagnostic biopsies in the two arms
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Sedation dose
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Complications
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Procedural pain
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Operator rated pain
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Operator rated overall procedure satisfaction
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
Ease of biopsy
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Operator rated pain on scope manipulation
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Expectation of diagnostic biopsy
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Mini Thoracoscopy
EXPERIMENTALThoracoscopy procedure shall be performed using the Rigid Mini Thoracoscope
Semirigid Thoracoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThoracoscopy procedure shall be performed using the SemiRigid Thoracoscope
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \>18 years Presence of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion as determined by the criteria detailed by Light et al where a specific diagnosis was not obtained after initial cytological and/or microbiological examinations.
- Adequate rib spaces for successful performance of thoracoscopy as judged by clinical examination Adequate pleural fluid space as judged by pre-procedural USG chest
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Coagulopathy (platelet count \< 50000/mm3, INR \> 1.5)
- Unstable hemodynamic status ( SBP \> 180, DBP\> 100 or SBP\< 90 mm Hg / heart failure
- Myocardial infarction or unstable angina in the last 6 wk
- Hypoxemia not correctable with low flow oxygen (SpO2 \<90% despite low flow oxygen @ 1-2 l/min)
- Extensive rib crowding as judged by clinical examination
- Extensive adhesions and lack of pleural space on USG chest
- Refusal of consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
New Delhi, 110029, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Randeep Guleria, MD, DM
AIIMS, New Delhi
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr Karan Madan MD, DM Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 1, 2016
First Posted
August 2, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 1, 2018
Study Completion
September 1, 2018
Last Updated
December 27, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-12