Impact of Pleural Manometry on Chest Discomfort After Therapeutic Thoracentesis
Manometry- Versus Symptom-Guided Large Volume Thoracentesis: a Randomized Controlled Study
3 other identifiers
interventional
89
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial attempts to determine whether the measurement of pleural pressures during therapeutic thoracentesis affects the development of chest discomfort after the procedure. During thoracentesis, pleural fluid is drained from the pleural space, resulting in lung expansion. In some cases, the lung is not completely re-expandable, in which case continued drainage results in the development of negative pleural pressures and chest discomfort. Negative pleural pressures may also result in other complications such as re-expansion pulmonary edema and pneumothorax. The identification of negative pleural pressures via manometry during the procedure may lead to a reduction in the complication rate.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 18, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 26, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 8, 2019
CompletedSeptember 26, 2019
September 1, 2019
1.8 years
January 18, 2016
September 24, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in post-procedure chest discomfort scores between control (symptom-guided) and intervention (manometry-guided) groups
As measured in millimeters along a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The estimated minimal clinically important difference is 15 mm. Descriptive statistics including means, standard deviations, and ranges will be presented. Investigations for outliers and assumptions for statistical analysis, e.g., normality and homoscedasticity will be made. If necessary, data will be transformed using Box-Cox power transformation. Comparisons between groups, i.e. intervention versus (vs) control, will be made using the t-test or Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. Mixed model will be employed to assess the trend of pain score measured across pre-, intra-, and post-procedure.
one-time assessment, 5 minutes after thoracentesis catheter is removed (on day 1)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change in chest discomfort scores from pre-procedure to post-procedure.
From 1 minute pre-procedure to 5 minutes after thoracentesis catheter is removed (on day 1)
Incidence of complete lung re-expansion, as assessed by post-procedure chest radiograph
20 minutes after thoracentesis catheter is removed (on day 1)
Duration of procedure
during the procedure, on day 1, intraoperative
Change in subjective report of dyspnea
From 1 minute pre-procedure to 5 minutes after thoracentesis catheter is removed (on day 1)
Incidence of clinically-significant re-expansion pulmonary edema
20 minutes after thoracentesis catheter is removed (on day 1)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Trend in VAS pain scores up to the point at which 1.5L of fluid is removed
at time of procedure
Study Arms (2)
Arm I: Manometry-guided thoracentesis
EXPERIMENTALIntervention Group - Patients undergo fine needle- aspiration, called therapeutic thoracentesis, to drain fluid accumulated around the lung. Unlike Arm II, the intervention group will have their pleural pressure monitored during the procedure.
Arm II: Symptom-guided thoracentesis
ACTIVE COMPARATORComparison Group - Patients undergo symptom-guided thoracentesis, the current standard-of-care is to drain fluid until 1) it is all gone or 2) a symptom occurs that indicates the lung may take longer to fully re-expand and drainage should be stopped.
Interventions
Arm I will undergo a standard of care therapeutic thoracentesis procedure, and in addition include pleural pressure monitoring (via an FDA-approved digital manometer) which is also standard of care but left at the discretion of physicians as per expert recommendations. In this group, the procedure will be stopped when the patient develops symptoms or when all the fluid has been removed, and will also be stopped if the pressure begins to fall quickly in the fluid collection.
Arm II will undergo a standard of care therapeutic thoracentesis procedure. In this group, the procedure but will be stopped when the patient develops symptoms or when all the fluid has been removed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Referral to pulmonary or interventional radiology services for large-volume thoracentesis
- Presence of a symptomatic moderate or large free-flowing pleural effusion on the basis of:
- Chest radiograph: effusion filling \>= 1/3 the hemithorax, OR
- Computed tomography (CT)-scan: maximum anteroposterior (AP) depth of the effusion \>= 1/3 of the AP dimension on the axial image superior to the hemidiaphragm, including atelectatic lung completely surrounded by effusion, OR
- Ultrasound: effusion spanning at least three rib spaces with depth of \>= 3 cm
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Study subject has any disease or condition that interferes with safe completion of the study including:
- Coagulopathy, with criteria left at the discretion of the operator
- Hemodynamic instability with systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg or heart rate \> 120 beats/min, unless deemed to be stable with these values by the attending physicians
- Pleural effusion is smaller than expected on bedside pre-procedure ultrasound
- Referral is for diagnostic thoracentesis only
- Manometry felt to be clinically indicated
- Inability to assume or maintain a seated position for the procedure
- Presence of multiple loculations on bedside pre-procedure ultrasound
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Centerlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Related Publications (2)
Lester M, Maldonado F, Rickman OB, Roller LJ, Avasarala SK, Katsis JM, Lentz RJ. Association between terminal pleural elastance and radiographic lung re-expansion after therapeutic thoracentesis in patients with symptomatic pleural effusion: a post-hoc analysis of a randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 12;12(7):e053606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053606.
PMID: 35820740DERIVEDLentz RJ, Lerner AD, Pannu JK, Merrick CM, Roller L, Walston C, Valenti S, Goddard T, Chen H, Huggins JT, Rickman OB, Yarmus L, Psallidas I, Rahman NM, Light RW, Maldonado F. Routine monitoring with pleural manometry during therapeutic large-volume thoracentesis to prevent pleural-pressure-related complications: a multicentre, single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2019 May;7(5):447-455. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30421-1. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
PMID: 30772283DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fabien Maldonado
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2016
First Posted
February 9, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 26, 2017
Study Completion
March 8, 2019
Last Updated
September 26, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09