NCT02677883

Brief Summary

This randomized controlled trial attempts to determine whether the measurement of pleural pressures during therapeutic thoracentesis affects the development of chest discomfort after the procedure. During thoracentesis, pleural fluid is drained from the pleural space, resulting in lung expansion. In some cases, the lung is not completely re-expandable, in which case continued drainage results in the development of negative pleural pressures and chest discomfort. Negative pleural pressures may also result in other complications such as re-expansion pulmonary edema and pneumothorax. The identification of negative pleural pressures via manometry during the procedure may lead to a reduction in the complication rate.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
89

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2016

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 18, 2016

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 9, 2016

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 26, 2017

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 8, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 26, 2019

Status Verified

September 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

January 18, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 24, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in post-procedure chest discomfort scores between control (symptom-guided) and intervention (manometry-guided) groups

    As measured in millimeters along a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The estimated minimal clinically important difference is 15 mm. Descriptive statistics including means, standard deviations, and ranges will be presented. Investigations for outliers and assumptions for statistical analysis, e.g., normality and homoscedasticity will be made. If necessary, data will be transformed using Box-Cox power transformation. Comparisons between groups, i.e. intervention versus (vs) control, will be made using the t-test or Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. Mixed model will be employed to assess the trend of pain score measured across pre-, intra-, and post-procedure.

    one-time assessment, 5 minutes after thoracentesis catheter is removed (on day 1)

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Change in chest discomfort scores from pre-procedure to post-procedure.

    From 1 minute pre-procedure to 5 minutes after thoracentesis catheter is removed (on day 1)

  • Incidence of complete lung re-expansion, as assessed by post-procedure chest radiograph

    20 minutes after thoracentesis catheter is removed (on day 1)

  • Duration of procedure

    during the procedure, on day 1, intraoperative

  • Change in subjective report of dyspnea

    From 1 minute pre-procedure to 5 minutes after thoracentesis catheter is removed (on day 1)

  • Incidence of clinically-significant re-expansion pulmonary edema

    20 minutes after thoracentesis catheter is removed (on day 1)

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Trend in VAS pain scores up to the point at which 1.5L of fluid is removed

    at time of procedure

Study Arms (2)

Arm I: Manometry-guided thoracentesis

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention Group - Patients undergo fine needle- aspiration, called therapeutic thoracentesis, to drain fluid accumulated around the lung. Unlike Arm II, the intervention group will have their pleural pressure monitored during the procedure.

Other: Manometry-guided thoracentesisOther: Symptom-guided thoracentesis

Arm II: Symptom-guided thoracentesis

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Comparison Group - Patients undergo symptom-guided thoracentesis, the current standard-of-care is to drain fluid until 1) it is all gone or 2) a symptom occurs that indicates the lung may take longer to fully re-expand and drainage should be stopped.

Other: Symptom-guided thoracentesis

Interventions

Arm I will undergo a standard of care therapeutic thoracentesis procedure, and in addition include pleural pressure monitoring (via an FDA-approved digital manometer) which is also standard of care but left at the discretion of physicians as per expert recommendations. In this group, the procedure will be stopped when the patient develops symptoms or when all the fluid has been removed, and will also be stopped if the pressure begins to fall quickly in the fluid collection.

Arm I: Manometry-guided thoracentesis

Arm II will undergo a standard of care therapeutic thoracentesis procedure. In this group, the procedure but will be stopped when the patient develops symptoms or when all the fluid has been removed.

Arm I: Manometry-guided thoracentesisArm II: Symptom-guided thoracentesis

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Referral to pulmonary or interventional radiology services for large-volume thoracentesis
  • Presence of a symptomatic moderate or large free-flowing pleural effusion on the basis of:
  • Chest radiograph: effusion filling \>= 1/3 the hemithorax, OR
  • Computed tomography (CT)-scan: maximum anteroposterior (AP) depth of the effusion \>= 1/3 of the AP dimension on the axial image superior to the hemidiaphragm, including atelectatic lung completely surrounded by effusion, OR
  • Ultrasound: effusion spanning at least three rib spaces with depth of \>= 3 cm

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Study subject has any disease or condition that interferes with safe completion of the study including:
  • Coagulopathy, with criteria left at the discretion of the operator
  • Hemodynamic instability with systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg or heart rate \> 120 beats/min, unless deemed to be stable with these values by the attending physicians
  • Pleural effusion is smaller than expected on bedside pre-procedure ultrasound
  • Referral is for diagnostic thoracentesis only
  • Manometry felt to be clinically indicated
  • Inability to assume or maintain a seated position for the procedure
  • Presence of multiple loculations on bedside pre-procedure ultrasound

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Lester M, Maldonado F, Rickman OB, Roller LJ, Avasarala SK, Katsis JM, Lentz RJ. Association between terminal pleural elastance and radiographic lung re-expansion after therapeutic thoracentesis in patients with symptomatic pleural effusion: a post-hoc analysis of a randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 12;12(7):e053606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053606.

  • Lentz RJ, Lerner AD, Pannu JK, Merrick CM, Roller L, Walston C, Valenti S, Goddard T, Chen H, Huggins JT, Rickman OB, Yarmus L, Psallidas I, Rahman NM, Light RW, Maldonado F. Routine monitoring with pleural manometry during therapeutic large-volume thoracentesis to prevent pleural-pressure-related complications: a multicentre, single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2019 May;7(5):447-455. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30421-1. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pleural Effusion

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pleural DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Fabien Maldonado

    Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2016

First Posted

February 9, 2016

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion

October 26, 2017

Study Completion

March 8, 2019

Last Updated

September 26, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-09

Locations