A Two-step Method Apparently Improved the Physicians' Level of Diagnosis Decision-making for Adult Patients With FUO
A Multicenter Prospective,Randomized and Controlled Pilot Study on the Diagnostic Strategy of So-called Two-step Method in Patients With FUO
2 other identifiers
observational
600
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether two-step method of diagnostic strategy is effective in the diagnosis and treatment of fever of unknown origin (FUO). (TSMD research, a pilot study) Fever of unknown origin (FUO) is a fever in excess of 38.3◦C continued for more than 3 weeks, and its cause could not be identified by tests during hospitalization for more than 1 week \[1\]. As diagnostic techniques such as imaging technology and clinical tests have been developed and outpatient access to diagnostic tests have improved, the FUO is defined as a shortened period where the cause could not be revealed despite diagnostic tests during three visits to the outpatient department or during 3 days of hospitalization \[2\]. FUO can be caused by many diseases, and causes can vary depending on region and time period. FUO was first reported in the medical literature 80 years ago. Since then, the causative diseases have greatly changed with changes in the social environment and widespread use of diagnostic imaging. The causes of FUO, according to traditional diagnosis and treatment, could be divided into four principal groups: infections, non-infectious inflammatory diseases (NIID, including rheumatic diseases and vasculitic diseases), neoplasms, and other diseases. Despite the development of various diagnostic techniques, 34-51% of FUO patients remain undiagnosed \[3,4\]. In China, over-reliance on antibiotics for disease therapy and infection prevention are common phenomena in traditional treatment of FUO\[5\]. Two-step method of diagnostic strategy is a method to diagnose FUO disease. First step is to differentiate FUO according to the onset of disease and invasive pathogens. Second step is to further differentiate FUO according to trends of disease and inflammation scores. The diagnosis of FUO can be difficult for both patients and their physicians. Depending on the experience and qualifications of the treating physicians, time to reach a diagnosis can vary. Two-step method of diagnostic strategy would afford a standard method for physicians to diagnoses the FUO. So many reports of FUO have also been published in China, but have been limited to single-facility or limited-region studies; no nationwide studies have yet been conducted. Moreover, few assessments of tests used in the diagnostic evaluation of FUO have been reported. In particular, few studies have assessed the clinical usefulness of tests such as serum procalcitonin or positron emission tomography (PET) in China, although these tests are now frequently used. We therefore will conduct a multicenter collaborative retrospective and prospective (randomized and controlled )study of patients with FUO at hospitals affiliated with China's Ministry of Health. This is the first nationwide study in China on diseases causing FUO and the diagnostic workup, and identified diseases that should be considered when evaluating FUO in China. In addition, we will investigate the rate of performing various tests in the current diagnostic workup of FUO. Classical FUO was diagnosed based on the definition by Durack et al\[6\] in patients meeting all of criteria 1-4 below. 1\. Fever with axillary temperature ≥38°C at least twice over a ≥3-week period. 2. Unknown cause after three outpatient visits or during 3 days of hospitalization. 3\. Not diagnosed with immunodeficiency before fever onset. 4. No confirmed HIV infection before fever onset. The data described below were collected. No additional testing was performed in this study due to insufficient data.
- 1.Patient characteristics: sex, age, concomitant disease, medical history and medication history.
- 2.Clinical findings: subjective symptoms and objective physical findings.
- 3.Blood tests: blood count, biochemical examination and inflammatory markers (C reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), procalcitonin, etc.).
- 4.Results of blood cultures if performed.
- 5.Results of imaging studies and endoscopy if performed.
- 6.Results of cytology, histology, genetic testing or autopsy findings if performed.
- 7.Final diagnosis, day of diagnosis and outcome. This study is safety for no drug involved to determine the effectiveness of two-step method of diagnostic strategy in the diagnosis and treatment of fever of unknown origin.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2014
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 12, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedMay 7, 2018
May 1, 2018
4.9 years
January 12, 2014
May 4, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
percentage of the FUO pateints being diagnosed correctly
the patients discharged from hospital or after following of up to 24 weeks
Study Arms (2)
tradition diagnostic strategy
According to the current diagnistic procedures of FUO
two-step diagnostic strategy
First step is to differentiate FUO according to the onset of disease and invasive pathogens. Second step is to further differentiate FUO according to trends of disease and inflammation scores.
Interventions
The first step is to differentiate FUO according to the onset of disease and invasive pathogens. Apart from collecting detailed present medical history and careful physical examination, it focuses on seeking the clues of bacterial invasion two weeks before the fever onset from five aspects.To finish this part, the doctor needs to ask for informations following a list we already made, which covers more than forty definite items. If some of these items were proved existed, result of first step would be positive. The second step is calculating the integral score of inflammatory biomarkers and vital diagnostic clues, WBC\& N, ESR, CRP, LDH, SF, ANCA, ANA, RF, PCT and T-Spot, as well as the clinical findings were included in this integrating system.The results of these items will be recorded and calculated with certain interval of time. If the score were more than nine, this part would be considered. positive.
Eligibility Criteria
patients meeting the definition of Classical FUO : 1. Fever with axillary temperature ≥38°C at least twice over a ≥3-week period. 2. Unknown cause after three outpatient visits or during one week of hospitalization.
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of FUO
- Agreed to take part in this study
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosed with immunodeficiency before fever onset.
- Confirmed HIV infection before fever onset.
- Hospitalized patients and hospital acquired infection cannot be ruled out
- Medical history of serious mental illness
- Medical history of severe seizures or using anticonvulsants currently
- Confirmed with HIV infection before fever onset or organ transplant patients, using glucocorticoid or immunsuppression or any other patients who are not considered to be suitable for this study
- having evidence of drug abuse or treat with methadone in the previous year
- included in other clinical trials
- unable or unwilling to provide informed consent or follow the request.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tongji Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Tongji Medical College Affiliated Tongji Hospital
Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China
Related Publications (7)
PETERSDORF RG, BEESON PB. Fever of unexplained origin: report on 100 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 1961 Feb;40:1-30. doi: 10.1097/00005792-196102000-00001. No abstract available.
PMID: 13734791BACKGROUNDDurack DT, Street AC. Fever of unknown origin--reexamined and redefined. Curr Clin Top Infect Dis. 1991;11:35-51. No abstract available.
PMID: 1651090BACKGROUNDVanderschueren S, Knockaert D, Adriaenssens T, Demey W, Durnez A, Blockmans D, Bobbaers H. From prolonged febrile illness to fever of unknown origin: the challenge continues. Arch Intern Med. 2003 May 12;163(9):1033-41. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.9.1033.
PMID: 12742800BACKGROUNDBleeker-Rovers CP, Vos FJ, de Kleijn EMHA, Mudde AH, Dofferhoff TSM, Richter C, Smilde TJ, Krabbe PFM, Oyen WJG, van der Meer JWM. A prospective multicenter study on fever of unknown origin: the yield of a structured diagnostic protocol. Medicine (Baltimore). 2007 Jan;86(1):26-38. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e31802fe858.
PMID: 17220753BACKGROUNDXiao Y, Zhang J, Zheng B, Zhao L, Li S, Li L. Changes in Chinese policies to promote the rational use of antibiotics. PLoS Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):e1001556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001556. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
PMID: 24260030BACKGROUNDChen J, Xu D, Sun WJ, Wang WX, Xie NN, Ruan QR, Song JX. Differential diagnosis of lymphoma with 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with fever of unknown origin accompanied by lymphadenopathy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug;149(10):7187-7196. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04665-7. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
PMID: 36884116DERIVEDChen J, Xing M, Xu D, Xie N, Zhang W, Ruan Q, Song J. Diagnostic models for fever of unknown origin based on 18F-FDG PET/CT: a prospective study in China. EJNMMI Res. 2022 Oct 28;12(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13550-022-00937-4.
PMID: 36307738DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jianxin Song, MD
Huazhong University of Scienc and Technology,Tongji Medical college affiliated Tongji Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 24 Weeks
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor, protomedicus
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 12, 2014
First Posted
January 14, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
May 7, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05