PET CT in Suspected CIED Infection, a Pilot Study - PET Guidance I
PET Guidance I
Positron Emission Tomography Combined With Computed Tomography (PET CT) in Suspected Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection, a Pilot Study - PET Guidance I
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this single-center randomized controlled trial is to assess clinical usefulness of positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET CT) in the diagnostic process of suspected cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection (lead dependent infective endocarditis, generator pocket infection, fever of unknown origin).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2014
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 13, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedMay 28, 2015
May 1, 2015
2.5 years
June 13, 2014
May 27, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants with established diagnosis
Standardization of PET CT in diagnostic process of local infections and lead dependent endocarditis in clinical practice. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) of the diagnosis held by PET CT compared with final clinical diagnosis
up to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Number of participants with remote infective complications
up to 6 months
Number of participants with particular localizations of infection
up to 6 months
Number of participants with sustained therapuetic decision
up to 6 months
Number of participants with complications of PET CT
up to 6 months
Study Arms (2)
CIED related infection
All patients will undergo standard diagnostic process that will consist of: medical interview, physical examination, laboratory tests, blood cultures (3 sets, 1 hour apart, repeated after 24 hours and -if applicable - with fever peak above 38°C); imaging studies (echocardiography: transthoracic, and if there are no contraindications transesophageal, in case of negative or equivocal result repeated after 7-10 days, or in series if necessary, computed tomography scan for pulmonary embolism if indicated); if there are abnormalities in other systems, decisions concerning further diagnostics will be made by the physician in charge. Apart from standard diagnostic procedures patients will undergo whole body PET CT scan to localize infection or inflammation. Then the investigators team will make a decision concerning further treatment (antibiotics and complete device removal vs conservative treatment).
Non-infective
Control group consisting of 20 pts with implanted CIEDs who underwent PET CT due to non infectious indications and have no data for infectious process in follow-up
Interventions
All patients are examined by a physicians before PET CT and if there are no contraindications they are given isotope intravenously. Then they stay in a warm waiting room. The dose of 18-FDG depends on patient's weight and varies from 270 to 420 MBq. Isotope uptake time is about 45-180 minutes. After that time the patient is asked to empty his or her bladder and go to the examination room. First CT scan lasting 2 min is performed followed by the PET scan lasting about 20 min. Usually area from mid tigh to eye level is scanned. In PET we use iterative reconstruction method (number of subsets 28, number of iterations 2), time of acquisition in one position of a table - 2 minutes. The following parameters will be analyzed: standardized uptake value (SUV) in the CIED area (pocket, leads), SUV of vascular background - pulmonary trunk, SUV of a liver, SUV max. in other potential changed areas, volume with increased SUV\> 40% of the background.
Eligibility Criteria
Study group - twenty pts with implanted CIEDs and suspected or diagnosed CIED-related infection or fever of unknown origin. Control group - twenty pts with implanted CIEDs who underwent PET CT due to non infectious indications and have no data for infectious process in follow-up.
You may qualify if:
- Age - 18 years and older.
- Written informed consent for participating in the study and written standard version of informed consent for PET CT scan.
- Suspected generator pocket infection
- Suspected cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infective endocarditis
- Fever of unknown origin in patient with CIED
You may not qualify if:
- Lack of written informed consent
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
- Inability to stay supine for the time of PET CT scan
- Unstable cardio-pulmonary state
- Glucose level above 200 mg/dl
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Cardiology, II Dept. of Coronary Heart Disease
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 02-637, Poland
Related Publications (18)
Baddour LM, Epstein AE, Erickson CC, Knight BP, Levison ME, Lockhart PB, Masoudi FA, Okum EJ, Wilson WR, Beerman LB, Bolger AF, Estes NA 3rd, Gewitz M, Newburger JW, Schron EB, Taubert KA; American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in Young; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care; American Heart Association. Update on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and their management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010 Jan 26;121(3):458-77. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192665. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
PMID: 20048212BACKGROUNDKlug D, Balde M, Pavin D, Hidden-Lucet F, Clementy J, Sadoul N, Rey JL, Lande G, Lazarus A, Victor J, Barnay C, Grandbastien B, Kacet S; PEOPLE Study Group. Risk factors related to infections of implanted pacemakers and cardioverter-defibrillators: results of a large prospective study. Circulation. 2007 Sep 18;116(12):1349-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.678664. Epub 2007 Aug 27.
PMID: 17724263BACKGROUNDGreenspon AJ, Patel JD, Lau E, Ochoa JA, Frisch DR, Ho RT, Pavri BB, Kurtz SM. 16-year trends in the infection burden for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the United States 1993 to 2008. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 30;58(10):1001-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.033.
PMID: 21867833BACKGROUNDCabell CH, Heidenreich PA, Chu VH, Moore CM, Stryjewski ME, Corey GR, Fowler VG Jr. Increasing rates of cardiac device infections among Medicare beneficiaries: 1990-1999. Am Heart J. 2004 Apr;147(4):582-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.06.005.
PMID: 15077071BACKGROUNDBongiorni MG, Marinskis G, Lip GY, Svendsen JH, Dobreanu D, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C; Scientific Initiative Committee, European Heart Rhythm Association. How European centres diagnose, treat, and prevent CIED infections: results of an European Heart Rhythm Association survey. Europace. 2012 Nov;14(11):1666-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus350.
PMID: 23104858BACKGROUNDDababneh AS, Sohail MR. Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection: a stepwise approach to diagnosis and management. Cleve Clin J Med. 2011 Aug;78(8):529-37. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.78a.10169.
PMID: 21807925BACKGROUNDHabib G, Hoen B, Tornos P, Thuny F, Prendergast B, Vilacosta I, Moreillon P, de Jesus Antunes M, Thilen U, Lekakis J, Lengyel M, Muller L, Naber CK, Nihoyannopoulos P, Moritz A, Zamorano JL; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis (new version 2009): the Task Force on the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and the International Society of Chemotherapy (ISC) for Infection and Cancer. Eur Heart J. 2009 Oct;30(19):2369-413. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp285. Epub 2009 Aug 27. No abstract available.
PMID: 19713420BACKGROUNDDarouiche RO. Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants. N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 1;350(14):1422-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra035415. No abstract available.
PMID: 15070792BACKGROUNDFerguson TB Jr, Ferguson CL, Crites K, Crimmins-Reda P. The additional hospital costs generated in the management of complications of pacemaker and defibrillator implantations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Apr;111(4):742-51;discussion 751-2. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70334-3.
PMID: 8614134BACKGROUNDFarkowski MM, Milkowski M, Dziuk M, Pytkowski M, Marciniak M, Kraska A, Szwed H, Sterlinski M. Economical aspect of PET/CT-guided diagnosis of suspected infective endocarditis in a patient with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Heart Lung. 2014 Jul-Aug;43(4):341-3. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 May 22.
PMID: 24856231BACKGROUNDSarrazin JF, Philippon F, Tessier M, Guimond J, Molin F, Champagne J, Nault I, Blier L, Nadeau M, Charbonneau L, Trottier M, O'Hara G. Usefulness of fluorine-18 positron emission tomography/computed tomography for identification of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 May 1;59(18):1616-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.059.
PMID: 22538331BACKGROUNDPloux S, Riviere A, Amraoui S, Whinnett Z, Barandon L, Lafitte S, Ritter P, Papaioannou G, Clementy J, Jais P, Bordenave L, Haissaguerre M, Bordachar P. Positron emission tomography in patients with suspected pacing system infections may play a critical role in difficult cases. Heart Rhythm. 2011 Sep;8(9):1478-81. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.03.062. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
PMID: 21463705BACKGROUNDBensimhon L, Lavergne T, Hugonnet F, Mainardi JL, Latremouille C, Maunoury C, Lepillier A, Le Heuzey JY, Faraggi M. Whole body [(18) F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for the diagnosis of pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator infection: a preliminary prospective study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Jun;17(6):836-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03312.x. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
PMID: 20636421BACKGROUNDCautela J, Alessandrini S, Cammilleri S, Giorgi R, Richet H, Casalta JP, Habib G, Raoult D, Mundler O, Deharo JC. Diagnostic yield of FDG positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with CEID infection: a pilot study. Europace. 2013 Feb;15(2):252-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus335. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
PMID: 23148119BACKGROUNDLeccisotti L, Perna F, Lago M, Leo M, Stefanelli A, Calcagni ML, Pelargonio G, Narducci ML, Bencardino G, Bellocci F, Giordano A. Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection: delayed vs standard FDG PET-CT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014 Jun;21(3):622-32. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-9896-2. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
PMID: 24715624BACKGROUNDMillar BC, Prendergast BD, Alavi A, Moore JE. 18FDG-positron emission tomography (PET) has a role to play in the diagnosis and therapy of infective endocarditis and cardiac device infection. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):1724-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
PMID: 23313465BACKGROUNDMarciniak-Emmons MB, Swierzynska E, Mazurek A, Syska P, Farkowski MM, Firek B, Juszczyk U, Zakrzewska-Koperska J, Zajac D, Oreziak A, Maciag A, Kowalik I, Pytkowski M, Szwed H, Bilinska M, Szumowski L, Dziuk M, Sterlinski M. Computed tomography with positron emission tomography is more useful in local than systemic infectious process related to cardiac implanted electrotherapy device: a prospective controlled multicenter diagnostic intervention PET-Guidance Trial. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Dec;38(12):2753-2761. doi: 10.1007/s10554-022-02663-3. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
PMID: 36445676DERIVEDMarciniak-Emmons MB, Sterlinski M, Syska P, Maciag A, Farkowski MM, Firek B, Dziuk M, Zajac D, Pytkowski M, Szwed H. New diagnostic pathways urgently needed. Protocol of PET Guidance I pilot study: positron emission tomography in suspected cardiac implantable electronic device-related infection. Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(1):47-52. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0113. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
PMID: 26101020DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maciej Sterliński, MD, PhD
National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
- STUDY CHAIR
Hanna Szwed, MD, PhD
National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 13, 2014
First Posted
July 22, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
May 28, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05