Spinal Control During Functional Activities to Improve Low Back Pain Outcomes
LBP
2 other identifiers
interventional
154
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Exercise is one of the primary interventions used with people with chronic, mechanical low back pain. It is unknown, however, which exercise is best for which person, which exercises a person will adhere to and for how long, and the effect of adhering to a specific type of exercise on how the person functions, particularly in the long run. The purpose of this study is to examine if the short- and long-term effects are different between 1) commonly prescribed strength and flexibility exercises for the trunk and limbs, and 2) individualized practice in daily functional activities that are difficult or painful to perform. Adherence to the different interventions, the relationship between adherence and outcomes,as well as the effect of a booster intervention also will be examined.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 2, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 6, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 10, 2019
CompletedAugust 21, 2020
August 1, 2020
3.8 years
January 2, 2014
June 18, 2019
August 8, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (0-100%) From Baseline to Completion of Initial 6 Week Intervention Phase
Background/Purpose: The 10-item Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire is a disease-specific measure that provides an index of a participant's perceived low back pain-related functional limitation. Procedure: Participants will answer each of the 10 questions by placing a mark in the one box that best describes his current condition. Since a participant may feel that 2 of the statements describe his condition, he is instructed to mark only the box that most closely describes his current condition. Scoring: Each item is given a value from 0-5. The total score is the sum of all questions divided by 50, multiplied by 100 to get a percent. 100 represents the highest level of limitation.
Baseline, completion of initial 6 week intervention phase
Change in Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (0-100%) From Completion of Initial 6 Week Intervention Phase to 6 Months After Initial Intervention Phase
Background/Purpose: The 10-item Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire is a disease-specific measure that provides an index of a participant's perceived low back pain-related functional limitation. Procedure: Participants will answer each of the 10 questions by placing a mark in the one box that best describes his current condition. Since a participant may feel that 2 of the statements describe his condition, he is instructed to mark only the box that most closely describes his current condition. Scoring: Each item is given a value from 0-5. The total score is the sum of all questions divided by 50, multiplied by 100 to get a percent. 100 represents the highest level of limitation.
Completion of initial 6 week intervention phase, 6 months after initial intervention phase
Change in Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (0-100%) From 6 Months After Initial Intervention Phase to 12 Months After Initial Intervention Phase
Background/Purpose: The 10-item Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire is a disease-specific measure that provides an index of a participant's perceived low back pain-related functional limitation. Procedure: Participants will answer each of the 10 questions by placing a mark in the one box that best describes his current condition. Since a participant may feel that 2 of the statements describe his condition, he is instructed to mark only the box that most closely describes his current condition. Scoring: Each item is given a value from 0-5. The total score is the sum of all questions divided by 50, multiplied by 100 to get a percent. 100 represents the highest level of limitation.
6 months after initial intervention phase, 12 months after initial intervention phase
Secondary Outcomes (26)
Change in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0-10) From Baseline to Completion of Initial 6 Week Intervention Phase
Baseline, completion of initial 6 week intervention phase
Change in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0-10) From Completion of Initial 6 Week Intervention Phase to 6 Months After Initial Intervention Phase
Completion of initial 6 week intervention phase, 6 months after initial intervention phase
Change in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0-10) From 6 Months After Initial Intervention Phase to 12 Months After Initial Intervention Phase
6 months after initial intervention phase, 12 months after initial intervention phase
Change in Number of Acute Flare-ups of Low Back Pain (#) in Past 6 Months, From Baseline to 6 Months After Initial Intervention Phase
Baseline, 6 months after initial intervention phase
Change in Number of Acute Flare-ups of Low Back Pain (#) in Past 6 Months, From 6 Months After the Initial Intervention Phase to 12 Months After Initial Intervention Phase
6 months after initial intervention phase, 12 months after initial intervention phase
- +21 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (16)
Adherence to Home Program (0-100%) at Completion of Initial 6 Week Intervention Phase
completion of initial 6 week intervention phase
Adherence to Home Program (0-100%) at 6 Months After Completion of Initial Intervention Phase
6 months after initial intervention phase
Adherence to Home Program (0-100%) at 12 Months After Initial Intervention Phase
12 months after initial intervention phase
- +13 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Motor skill training
EXPERIMENTALThe motor skill training condition involves supervised, massed practice of novel, challenging functional activities that are difficult or painful for the participant to perform due to his low back pain.
Strength and flexibility exercise
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe strength and flexibility exercise condition involves performance of 1) strengthening exercises that target all trunk muscles, and 2) flexibility exercises that target all trunk and lower extremity motions.
Interventions
The participant will assist in selecting both simple and complex functional activities to practice. Difficulty will be graded to match the participant's motor capabilities. Three activities will be practiced per session. Within the practice of activities the training will emphasize 1) contraction of groups of specific trunk muscles, 2) earlier and greater movement of the hip, knee, and/or thoracic spine relative to the lumbar spine, 3) later and less movement of the lumbar spine relative to other regions. Within each activity the conditions of practice will vary based on 1) the participant's ability to perform the activity, and 2) the level of challenge the participant is faced with when performing the activity during his day. Equipment will be provided as needed.
Exercises based on best evidence for effectiveness in people with chronic low back pain will be prescribed. Strengthening exercises will target all trunk muscles. Flexibility exercises will target all trunk and hip motions. All exercises will be performed at the intensity appropriate for the person's musculoskeletal fitness level based on the American College of Sports Medicine guidelines. Difficulty level, frequency, and number of repetitions will be modified based on guidelines described in the literature. Equipment will be provided as needed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- chronic low back pain for a minimum of 12 months
- currently experiencing low back pain symptoms but not in a recurrence or an acute flare-up
- Modified Oswestry Disability Index score of ≥ 20%
- or more functional activities limited due to low back pain
- able to stand and walk without assistance
- able to understand and sign a consent form
You may not qualify if:
- BMI \>30
- any structural spinal deformity including scoliosis, kyphosis, or stenosis
- spinal fracture or dislocation
- low back pain due to trauma
- osteoporosis
- ankylosing spondylitis
- rheumatoid arthritis
- fibromyalgia
- symptomatic disc herniation
- spondylolisthesis
- serious spinal complications such as tumor or infection
- previous spinal surgery
- frank neurological loss, i.e., weakness and sensory loss
- pain or paresthesia below the knee
- etiology of low back pain other than the lumbar spine, e.g., hip joint
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63018-2212, United States
Related Publications (3)
Lanier VM, Lohse KR, Hooker QL, Francois SJ, van Dillen LR. Treatment preference changes after exposure to treatment in adults with chronic low back pain. PM R. 2023 Jul;15(7):817-827. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12897. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
PMID: 36106673DERIVEDvan Dillen LR, Lanier VM, Steger-May K, Wallendorf M, Norton BJ, Civello JM, Czuppon SL, Francois SJ, Roles K, Lang CE. Effect of Motor Skill Training in Functional Activities vs Strength and Flexibility Exercise on Function in People With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2021 Apr 1;78(4):385-395. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4821.
PMID: 33369625DERIVEDFrancois SJ, Lanier VM, Marich AV, Wallendorf M, Van Dillen LR. A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Treatment Preference of People With Chronic Low Back Pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Dec;99(12):2496-2503. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.027. Epub 2018 May 28.
PMID: 29852151DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Linda van Dillen, PT, PhD, FAPTA; Research Division Director
- Organization
- Washington University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Linda R Van Dillen, P.T., Ph.D.
Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University Medical School
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 2, 2014
First Posted
January 6, 2014
Study Start
January 15, 2014
Primary Completion
November 1, 2017
Study Completion
November 1, 2017
Last Updated
August 21, 2020
Results First Posted
July 10, 2019
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share