Medial Branch Blocks vs. Intra-articular Injections: Randomized, Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
225
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Background: Facet interventions are the second most commonly performed procedure in pain clinics throughout the U.S, including in the military. Currently, there is no clear consensus regarding whether intra-articular (IA) blocks or medial branch blocks (facet joint nerve; MBB) are the best way to diagnose and treat facetogenic pain, or even whether or not to perform diagnostic/ prognostic blocks. Hypothesis: IA blocks will provide better relief than MBB, but MBB may better select patients for radiofrequency denervation. Purpose: Objective 1: Determine which "prognostic" block is the best predictor for RF denervation outcome; Objective 2: To determine whether adding steroids to IA or MBB may provide intermediate or long-term benefit to a subset of individuals. Research Design: Randomized, comparative-effectiveness study Methodology /Technical Approach: A total of 225 patients with non-radicular chronic low back pain (LBP) with suspected facetogenic etiology will be randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to one of 3 groups: Group 1 will receive IA blocks with steroids and LA Group 2 will receive MBB with steroids and LA Group 3 will receive MBB with only saline Those individuals who obtain significant (≥ 50% in groups 1 and 2,3) but temporary (\< 1-month) relief will undergo radiofrequency (RF) denervation at their 1-month follow-up. In group 3, those patients who do not experience pain relief at 1-month will undergo RF denervation regardless of the pain relief they experience (as many practitioners in the military and civilian practices do without diagnostic blocks).1-3 Participants in Groups 1 and 2 who experience prolonged relief from their diagnostic/ therapeutic blocks with LA and steroids will not undergo RF denervation until their pain returns. Those individuals who experience prolonged relief lasting \> 6 months will be given the option of repeating the diagnostic/ therapeutic block. In Groups 1, 2 and 3 patients who experience prolonged relief from the diagnostic blocks, follow-up visits will be at 1-month, 3-months and 6-months after the block, or until their pain relief wears off. In those who undergo denervation based on a positive block, follow-ups will be performed 1, 3 and 6-months after the denervation provided they continue to experience significant (\> 50%) relief at each follow-up. Those individuals who fail to experience significant relief after denervation will be unblinded and exit the study per protocol.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2017
CompletedJanuary 12, 2018
January 1, 2018
3.4 years
December 1, 2013
January 10, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain Score
0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) average pain score after facet injection
1 month
Pain Score
0-10 numerical rating scale pain score after radiofrequency ablation
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (29)
Successful outcome after RF denervation
1 month
Successful outcome after RF denervation
3 months
Successful outcome after RF denervation
6 months
Successful outcome after facet block
1 month
Successful outcome after facet block
3 months
- +24 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Intra-articular injection
EXPERIMENTALIntra-articular injection into the affected facet joint(s) with 0.5 ml of a 50:50 solution containing 10 mg of depo-methylprednisolone and 0.5% bupivacaine
Medial branch block
ACTIVE COMPARATORMedial branch blocks at the nerves that supply the affected facet joint(s) with 0.5 ml of a 50:50 solution containing 10 mg of depo-methylprednisolone and 0.5% bupivacaine
Saline injection
SHAM COMPARATORInjection into the affected facet joint(s) with 0.5 ml of normal saline
Interventions
Intra-articular injection into the affected facet joint(s) with 0.5 ml of a 50:50 solution containing 10 mg of depo-methylprednisolone and 0.5% bupivacaine. If the subject has a positive block a radiofrequency denervation will be performed at the affected joint.
Medial branch blocks at the nerves that supply the affected facet joint(s) with 0.5 ml of a 50:50 solution containing 10 mg of depo-methylprednisolone and 0.5% bupivacaine. If the subject has a positive block a radiofrequency denervation will be performed at the affected joint.
Injection into the affected facet joint(s) with 0.5 ml of normal saline. All subjects in the group will receive radiofrequency denervation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18 years
- Suspected lumbar facet arthropathy based on history and physical exam (e.g. axial lower back pain, paraspinal tenderness, no pain referral below the knee)
- NRS back pain score \> 4;
- MRI evidence of spinal pathology consistent with symptoms.
You may not qualify if:
- Untreated coagulopathy
- No MRI study
- Signs or symptoms of cauda equina syndrome
- Focal neurological signs and symptoms
- Allergic reactions to local anesthetics or contrast dye
- Serious medical or condition that might preclude optimal outcome
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20889, United States
Related Publications (3)
Cohen SP, Huang JH, Brummett C. Facet joint pain--advances in patient selection and treatment. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013 Feb;9(2):101-16. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.198. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
PMID: 23165358BACKGROUNDCohen SP, Raja SN. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of lumbar zygapophysial (facet) joint pain. Anesthesiology. 2007 Mar;106(3):591-614. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200703000-00024.
PMID: 17325518BACKGROUNDCohen SP, Doshi TL, Constantinescu OC, Zhao Z, Kurihara C, Larkin TM, Griffith SR, Jacobs MB, Kroski WJ, Dawson TC, Fowler IM, White RL, Verdun AJ, Jamison DE, Anderson-White M, Shank SE, Pasquina PF. Effectiveness of Lumbar Facet Joint Blocks and Predictive Value before Radiofrequency Denervation: The Facet Treatment Study (FACTS), a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology. 2018 Sep;129(3):517-535. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002274.
PMID: 29847426DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven P Cohen, MD
Johns Hopkins University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2013
First Posted
December 5, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2017
Study Completion
August 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 12, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share