The Efficacy of the Kyrobak for Chronic Low Back Pain (LBP-2)
LBP-2
The Kyrobak Continuous Passive Motion Device for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the Kyrobak continuous passive motion home-use device in relieving low back pain, improving proprioception (balance and fall prevention) and improving the symmetry of muscle function on either side of the spine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Oct 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 27, 2015
CompletedJuly 27, 2015
June 1, 2014
2 months
December 11, 2013
June 28, 2015
June 28, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Amount of Pain Determined by the NRS at the End of the 3-week Treatment Plan Compared to Baseline (Before Treatment)
Pain level will be scored by the subject using the NRS on a 0 to 10 scale where 10 represents the highest level of pain and 0 represents no pain.
3 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in Proprioception and Vestibular Function.
3 weeks, 4 weeks
Change in Functional Health Status by ODI
3 weeks, 4 weeks
Change in Symmetry of Muscle Function on Either Side of the Spine
3 weeks, 4 weeks
Change in Heart Rate Variability (and the Autonomic System)
3 weeks, 4 weeks
Other Outcomes (1)
Change in Amount of Pain Determined by the NRS at the 1-week Follow-up After the End of the 3-week Treatment Plan Compared to Baseline (Before Treatment)
4 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Treatment Continuous Passive Motion
OTHERSingle-arm; 3-week treatment plan using Kyrobak compared to baseline (before treatment)
Interventions
Daily self-treatments at home for 3 weeks, with up to three 10-minute treatment sessions per day
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female, age 18 or older
- Level of pain - mild to moderate low back pain (≤5 NRS pain)
- Chronic - symptoms must have been present for at least 12 weeks or more.
- Location - lower tip of scapula to back of pelvis
- Etiology - non-specific
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have low back pain due to specific and known causes (infection, tumor, osteoporosis, ankylosing spondylitis, fracture, inflammatory process, radicular syndrome (radiating nerve pain from the spine such as sciatica), cauda equinal syndrome (serious neurological disorder where the spinal nerve roots are compressed which can cause).
- Weight in excess of 265 lbs. (120.4 kg)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Recent history of violent trauma
- History of previous back surgery
- Constant progressive, non-mechanical pain (no relief with bed rest)
- Chronic pain other than low back pain
- Past medical history of malignant tumor
- Has taken an investigational drug within the past 30 days prior to entering the study, or currently enrolled in another investigational study
- Mental disorder that would lead to difficulty in questionnaire completion
- Any litigation for low back pain
- Prolonged use of corticosteroids (i.e. used for 3 months or more)
- Present use of prescription pain medication (i.e. Percocet®, Oxycodone, Vicodin®, etc.)
- Physical disability that prevents the subject to lie down/get up
- Drug abuse, immunosuppression, HIV
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Radiancylead
Study Sites (1)
New Heights Chiropractic
New York, New York, 10033, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Daniele Perl-Treves, Clinical Director
- Organization
- Radiancy Ltd
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven G Geanopulos, DC
New Heights Chiropractic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2013
First Posted
June 4, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 27, 2015
Results First Posted
July 27, 2015
Record last verified: 2014-06