NCT01998269

Brief Summary

The study objective is to develop and test a Measure of Drug Self-Management for use in clinical settings among patients with hypertension and diabetes. While medication non-adherence is a highly recognized public health and patient safety concern, it is rarely assessed in a routine and consistent manner in clinical settings. With the aging of the US population and rising rates of chronic disease, an increasing number of adults are being prescribed multi-drug regimens that require greater self-management skills. Despite the complexity of medication use, adherence has most commonly been measured as a limited set of behaviors (i.e., filling a prescription, taking doses). This emphasis has, over time, simplified how we think of prescription (Rx) medication use and directed attention away from the full range of tasks associated with effective Rx self-management. The field of health literacy research has deconstructed these tasks in considerable detail in recent years, and can offer insight into a more comprehensive measurement of patients' outpatient Rx use. There is a clear need for a brief, yet inclusive, measure of adherence that can be used in clinical settings to routinely assess patients' use of complex Rx regimens. Such an assessment could be used to guide clinicians in addressing specific patient challenges to safe and appropriate medication use. In response to this need, our study proposes to develop a new assessment of medication self-management. This unique measure will utilize health literacy best practices to promote patient comprehension and ease-of-use; it will also be tailored to patients' actual regimens via electronic health record (EHR) data. Finally, the tool will be available in both English and Spanish to support use among diverse patient populations. Our study aims are to:

  1. 1.Develop and refine a Measure of Drug Self-Management (MeDS) prototype.
  2. 2.Inform the content, structure and delivery of the MeDS through targeted discussions with patients, providers and information technology specialists.
  3. 3.Test the reliability and validity of the MeDS among patients with diabetes and hypertension

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
210

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2013

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2013

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 15, 2013

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 28, 2013

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2014

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 2, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

April 2, 2015

Status Verified

November 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

November 15, 2013

Results QC Date

January 21, 2015

Last Update Submit

April 1, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Measure of Medication Self-Management (MeDS)

    The MeDS is an assessment of medication self-management skills. The MeDS tool has 14 questions, the minimum score is 0 (poor medication self-management skills) and the maximum score is 14 (adequate self-management skills). The internal consistency of the scale is .72 (cronbach's alpha), which is considered adequate internal consistency. The MeDS was compared to The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale is one of the most commonly used assessments of medication adherence. It includes 8 questions that assess various factors that can affect medication use, such as forgetfulness, busyness and side effects. Scores range from 0 to 8, with lower scores reflecting better adherence.

    cross-sectional, 1 hour interview after clinic visit

Study Arms (1)

Adult patients with diabetes and hypertension

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adult, primary care patients with diabetes and hypertension

You may qualify if:

  • be ≥ 18 years old,
  • have a diagnosis of diabetes and hypertension,
  • be prescribed 3 or more drugs to treat these conditions,
  • speak English or Spanish as their primary language,
  • have primary responsibility for administering their own medications,
  • be a registered UNC patient.

You may not qualify if:

  • severe, uncorrectable visual, hearing or cognitive impairments that would preclude study consent or participation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ambulatory Care Center

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes MellitusHypertension

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Stacy Bailey
Organization
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Study Officials

  • Stacy C Bailey, PhD MPH

    University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2013

First Posted

November 28, 2013

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion

November 1, 2014

Study Completion

November 1, 2014

Last Updated

April 2, 2015

Results First Posted

April 2, 2015

Record last verified: 2014-11

Locations