Study Stopped
Business Decision; No Safety Or Efficacy Concerns. (See below)
Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil Used in Combination With Metformin in Participants With Hypertension and Diabetes
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3b Proof-of-Concept Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-491 Compared to Placebo When Used in Combination With Metformin in Subjects With Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes
2 other identifiers
interventional
105
1 country
68
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antihypertensive and antiglycemic effects, as well as the safety and tolerability of TAK-491 (azilsartan medoxomil), once daily (QD), in stage 1 hypertensive, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) participants whose glycemic control was inadequate on metformin alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 hypertension
Started Jan 2012
68 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 6, 2015
CompletedMay 6, 2015
April 1, 2015
1.3 years
December 18, 2011
May 14, 2014
April 20, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Trough Sitting Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure
The change in trough systolic blood pressure measured at week 8 relative to baseline. The trough is the average of the non-missing values of the 3 serial trough sitting systolic blood pressure measurements.
Baseline and Week 8
Secondary Outcomes (22)
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Trough Sitting Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure
Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline in the 24-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline in the 24-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline in the Mean Daytime (6 AM to 10 PM) Systolic Blood Pressure, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
Baseline and Week 8
- +17 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Placebo QD
PLACEBO COMPARATORAzilsartan medoxomil placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALAzilsartan medoxomil 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALAzilsartan medoxomil 80 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Was male or female and ≥18 years.
- Had type 2 diabetes mellitus with HbA1c of ≥7.5 to ≤9.5% at Screening.
- Was treated with metformin alone (no treatment with any antidiabetic agents other than metformin within the 3 months prior to Screening) and was experiencing inadequate glycemic control. The participant should have received metformin monotherapy for ≥8 weeks prior to Screening at a stable dose ≥1500 mg). Participants with a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) that was documented to be less than 1500 mg of metformin could also be enrolled if this dose had been stable for 8 weeks prior to Screening.
- Was treated with antihypertensive therapy and had a mean, trough, sitting clinic systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥135 and \< 160 mm Hg on Day -1 (after washout of prior antihypertensive therapy) or the participant had not received antihypertensive treatment within 28 days before Screening and had a mean sitting clinic SBP ≥135 and \< 160 mm Hg at the Screening Visit and on Day -1.
You may not qualify if:
- Had a mean, trough, sitting clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 100 mm Hg at Day -1.
- Had type 1 or poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (HbA1c \>9.5%) at Screening.
- Was taking or expected to take an excluded medication.
- Had a history of myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack.
- Had clinically significant cardiac conduction defects (for example, 3rd degree atrioventricular block, left bundle branch block, sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation).
- Had hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow obstruction due to aortic valvular disease.
- Had secondary hypertension of any etiology (e.g., renovascular disease, pheochromocytoma, Cushing's syndrome).
- Had renal dysfunction defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at Screening.
- Had albuminuria defined as \>200 mg/g at Screening.
- Had known or suspected unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis.
- Had unexplained microhematuria ≥3 RBCs/HPF or macrohematuria at Screening and confirmed on repeat testing.
- Treatment with antidiabetic agents (sulfonylureas, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glinides, thiazolidinediones (TZDs), and/or insulin) other than metformin during the 3 months prior to Screening.
- Had hyperkalemia as defined by central laboratory normal reference range at Screening.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (68)
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Green Valley, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Buena Park, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Hawaiian Gardens, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Norwalk, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Paramount, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Sacramento, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Tustin, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Denver, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Bradenton, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Brooksville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Hallandale, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Jupiter, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Winter Park, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Roswell, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Evergreen Park, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Gurnee, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Avon, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Greenfield, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Paducah, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbia, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Unknown Facility
Margate City, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Unknown Facility
Brooklyn, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Calabash, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Lenoir, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Morehead City, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Salisbury, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Centerville, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Downingtown, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Fleetwood, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Reading, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Unknown Facility
Anderson, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Irving, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
North Richland Hills, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Pearland, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Burke, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Manassas, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Because of low enrollment in the study, the sample sizes in the results data do not allow for significant interpretation of the results.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director; Clinical Science
- Organization
- Takeda
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Director, Clinical Science
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2011
First Posted
December 21, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
May 6, 2015
Results First Posted
May 6, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-04