Acute Feedback on Left ventrIcular Lead Implantation Location for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
CCI impact
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Exploratory, prospective, interventional, non-randomized single-center research study to compare metrics derived from 2 or 3-D reconstructions of lead movement, bioimpedance and VCG to augmentation of left ventricular contractility (LV dP/dt max) at different pacing configurations in patients undergoing a CRT-implant. Pacing sites and contractility data will be compared to pre operative cardiac ultrasound and MRI metrics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable heart-failure
Started May 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 27, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedMarch 31, 2016
March 1, 2016
1.9 years
November 1, 2013
March 30, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
dP\dt max response to different ventricular lead pacing sites
To compare metrics derived from 2 or 3-D reconstructions of lead movement to augmentation of left ventricular contractility (LV dP/dt max) at different pacing configurations in patients undergoing a CRT-implant Main objective is to identify the optimal LV pacing site within each patient where the force of contraction during BiV pacing is maximized and to assess the feasibility of a non-invasive sensor to identify this optimal site.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Lead movements and electrical measures
6 months
Metrics derived from 2/3-D reconstructions of lead movement and Force-Interval-Relation
6 months
Metrics derived from 2/3-D reconstructions of lead movement and CardioGuide Motion Map
6 months
Study Arms (1)
CRT implantation
OTHERStandard CRT indication. Assessment of acute response to CRT.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is indicated for CRT or CRT-D device according to current applicable ESC/AHA guidelines
- Subject receives optimal heart failure oral medical therapy (ACE inhibitor and/or ARB and Beta Blockers), and is on a stable medication scheme for at least 2 months prior to enrollment.
- Subject (or the legal guardian) is willing to sign informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Permanent atrial fibrillation/ flutter or tachycardia
- RBBB
- Recent myocardial infarction (MI), within 40 days prior to enrollment. Subject underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or valve surgery, within 90 days prior to enrollment
- Post heart transplantation, or is actively listed on the transplantation list, or has reasonable probability (per investigator's discretion) of undergoing transplantation in the next year
- Implanted with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), or has reasonable probability (per investigator's discretion) of receiving a LVAD in the next year
- On chronic renal dialysis, or with severe renal disease (defined as estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (equation provided by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study): (eGFR) \< 30 mL/min/1.73m2)
- On continuous or uninterrupted infusion (inotropic) therapy for heart failure (≥ 2 stable infusions a week)
- Severe aortic stenosis (with a valve area of \<1.0 cm2 or significant valve disease expected to be operated on within study period)
- Complex and uncorrected congenital heart disease
- Mechanical heart valve
- Breastfeeding women, or women of child bearing potential and who are not on a reliable form of birth control
- Enrolled in one or more concurrent studies that would confound the results of this study
- Already implanted with pacemaker (CRT, CRT-D, ICD) and needs replacement
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet
Oslo, Oslo County, 0424, Norway
Related Publications (20)
Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, De Marco T, Carson P, DiCarlo L, DeMets D, White BG, DeVries DW, Feldman AM; Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Investigators. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2140-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032423.
PMID: 15152059BACKGROUNDCleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, Tavazzi L; Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure (CARE-HF) Study Investigators. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005 Apr 14;352(15):1539-49. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050496. Epub 2005 Mar 7.
PMID: 15753115BACKGROUNDAbraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, Delurgio DB, Leon AR, Loh E, Kocovic DZ, Packer M, Clavell AL, Hayes DL, Ellestad M, Trupp RJ, Underwood J, Pickering F, Truex C, McAtee P, Messenger J; MIRACLE Study Group. Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 13;346(24):1845-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013168.
PMID: 12063368BACKGROUNDFornwalt BK, Sprague WW, BeDell P, Suever JD, Gerritse B, Merlino JD, Fyfe DA, Leon AR, Oshinski JN. Agreement is poor among current criteria used to define response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2010 May 11;121(18):1985-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.910778. Epub 2010 Apr 26.
PMID: 20421518BACKGROUNDButter C, Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Fleck E, Ding J, Yu Y, Huvelle E, Spinelli J; Pacing Therapy for Chronic Heart Failure II Study Group. Effect of resynchronization therapy stimulation site on the systolic function of heart failure patients. Circulation. 2001 Dec 18;104(25):3026-9. doi: 10.1161/hc5001.102229.
PMID: 11748094BACKGROUNDRossillo A, Verma A, Saad EB, Corrado A, Gasparini G, Marrouche NF, Golshayan AR, McCurdy R, Bhargava M, Khaykin Y, Burkhardt JD, Martin DO, Wilkoff BL, Saliba WI, Schweikert RA, Raviele A, Natale A. Impact of coronary sinus lead position on biventricular pacing: mortality and echocardiographic evaluation during long-term follow-up. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004 Oct;15(10):1120-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.04089.x.
PMID: 15485432BACKGROUNDMerchant FM, Heist EK, McCarty D, Kumar P, Das S, Blendea D, Ellinor PT, Mela T, Picard MH, Ruskin JN, Singh JP. Impact of segmental left ventricle lead position on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2010 May;7(5):639-44. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.01.035. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
PMID: 20298819BACKGROUNDMullens W, Verga T, Grimm RA, Starling RC, Wilkoff BL, Tang WHW. Persistent hemodynamic benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy with disease progression in advanced heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Feb 17;53(7):600-607. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.079.
PMID: 19215835BACKGROUNDBlendea D, Singh JP. Lead positioning strategies to enhance response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Fail Rev. 2011 May;16(3):291-303. doi: 10.1007/s10741-010-9212-4.
PMID: 21184174BACKGROUNDDuckett SG, Ginks M, Shetty AK, Bostock J, Gill JS, Hamid S, Kapetanakis S, Cunliffe E, Razavi R, Carr-White G, Rinaldi CA. Invasive acute hemodynamic response to guide left ventricular lead implantation predicts chronic remodeling in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 6;58(11):1128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.042.
PMID: 21884950BACKGROUNDBogaard MD, Houthuizen P, Bracke FA, Doevendans PA, Prinzen FW, Meine M, van Gelder BM. Baseline left ventricular dP/dtmax rather than the acute improvement in dP/dtmax predicts clinical outcome in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Oct;13(10):1126-32. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr094. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
PMID: 21791536BACKGROUNDButter C, Stellbrink C, Belalcazar A, Villalta D, Schlegl M, Sinha A, Cuesta F, Reister C. Cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization by finger plethysmography. Heart Rhythm. 2004 Nov;1(5):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.07.002.
PMID: 15851221BACKGROUNDWhinnett ZI, Davies JE, Willson K, Chow AW, Foale RA, Davies DW, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Mayet J. Determination of optimal atrioventricular delay for cardiac resynchronization therapy using acute non-invasive blood pressure. Europace. 2006 May;8(5):358-66. doi: 10.1093/europace/eul017.
PMID: 16635996BACKGROUNDWhinnett ZI, Davies JE, Willson K, Manisty CH, Chow AW, Foale RA, Davies DW, Hughes AD, Mayet J, Francis DP. Haemodynamic effects of changes in atrioventricular and interventricular delay in cardiac resynchronisation therapy show a consistent pattern: analysis of shape, magnitude and relative importance of atrioventricular and interventricular delay. Heart. 2006 Nov;92(11):1628-34. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.080721. Epub 2006 May 18.
PMID: 16709698BACKGROUNDBocchiardo M, Meyer zu Vilsendorf D, Militello C, Lippert M, Czygan G, Schauerte P, Gaita F, Stellbrink C. Resynchronization therapy optimization by intracardiac impedance. Europace. 2010 Nov;12(11):1589-95. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq273. Epub 2010 Jul 28.
PMID: 20667892BACKGROUNDTurcott RG, Witteles RM, Wang PJ, Vagelos RH, Fowler MB, Ashley EA. Measurement precision in the optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ Heart Fail. 2010 May;3(3):395-404. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.109.900076. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
PMID: 20176716BACKGROUNDJia P, Ramanathan C, Ghanem RN, Ryu K, Varma N, Rudy Y. Electrocardiographic imaging of cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: observation of variable electrophysiologic responses. Heart Rhythm. 2006 Mar;3(3):296-310. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.11.025.
PMID: 16500302BACKGROUNDShetty AK, Duckett SG, Ma YL, Kapetanakis S, Ginks M, Bostock J, Carr-White G, Rhode K, Razavi R, Rinaldi CA. The acute hemodynamic response to LV pacing within individual branches of the coronary sinus using a quadripolar lead. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Feb;35(2):196-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03268.x. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
PMID: 22126664BACKGROUNDTysler M, Kneppo P, Turzova M, Svehlikova J, Karas S, Heblakova E, Hana K, Filipova S. Noninvasive assessment of local myocardium repolarization changes using high resolution surface ECG mapping. Physiol Res. 2007;56 Suppl 1:S133-S141. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.931312. Epub 2007 May 31.
PMID: 17552884BACKGROUNDvan Deursen C, van Geldorp IE, Rademakers LM, van Hunnik A, Kuiper M, Klersy C, Auricchio A, Prinzen FW. Left ventricular endocardial pacing improves resynchronization therapy in canine left bundle-branch hearts. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009 Oct;2(5):580-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.846022. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
PMID: 19843927BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, Ph.d
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 2013
First Posted
November 27, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
April 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 31, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03