NCT01996397

Brief Summary

Exploratory, prospective, interventional, non-randomized single-center research study to compare metrics derived from 2 or 3-D reconstructions of lead movement, bioimpedance and VCG to augmentation of left ventricular contractility (LV dP/dt max) at different pacing configurations in patients undergoing a CRT-implant. Pacing sites and contractility data will be compared to pre operative cardiac ultrasound and MRI metrics.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable heart-failure

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2013

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2013

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 1, 2013

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 27, 2013

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

March 31, 2016

Status Verified

March 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

November 1, 2013

Last Update Submit

March 30, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Heart failureBundle branch blockCRT response

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • dP\dt max response to different ventricular lead pacing sites

    To compare metrics derived from 2 or 3-D reconstructions of lead movement to augmentation of left ventricular contractility (LV dP/dt max) at different pacing configurations in patients undergoing a CRT-implant Main objective is to identify the optimal LV pacing site within each patient where the force of contraction during BiV pacing is maximized and to assess the feasibility of a non-invasive sensor to identify this optimal site.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Lead movements and electrical measures

    6 months

  • Metrics derived from 2/3-D reconstructions of lead movement and Force-Interval-Relation

    6 months

  • Metrics derived from 2/3-D reconstructions of lead movement and CardioGuide Motion Map

    6 months

Study Arms (1)

CRT implantation

OTHER

Standard CRT indication. Assessment of acute response to CRT.

Procedure: Cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject is indicated for CRT or CRT-D device according to current applicable ESC/AHA guidelines
  • Subject receives optimal heart failure oral medical therapy (ACE inhibitor and/or ARB and Beta Blockers), and is on a stable medication scheme for at least 2 months prior to enrollment.
  • Subject (or the legal guardian) is willing to sign informed consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Permanent atrial fibrillation/ flutter or tachycardia
  • RBBB
  • Recent myocardial infarction (MI), within 40 days prior to enrollment. Subject underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or valve surgery, within 90 days prior to enrollment
  • Post heart transplantation, or is actively listed on the transplantation list, or has reasonable probability (per investigator's discretion) of undergoing transplantation in the next year
  • Implanted with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), or has reasonable probability (per investigator's discretion) of receiving a LVAD in the next year
  • On chronic renal dialysis, or with severe renal disease (defined as estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (equation provided by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study): (eGFR) \< 30 mL/min/1.73m2)
  • On continuous or uninterrupted infusion (inotropic) therapy for heart failure (≥ 2 stable infusions a week)
  • Severe aortic stenosis (with a valve area of \<1.0 cm2 or significant valve disease expected to be operated on within study period)
  • Complex and uncorrected congenital heart disease
  • Mechanical heart valve
  • Breastfeeding women, or women of child bearing potential and who are not on a reliable form of birth control
  • Enrolled in one or more concurrent studies that would confound the results of this study
  • Already implanted with pacemaker (CRT, CRT-D, ICD) and needs replacement

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet

Oslo, Oslo County, 0424, Norway

Location

Related Publications (20)

  • Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, De Marco T, Carson P, DiCarlo L, DeMets D, White BG, DeVries DW, Feldman AM; Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Investigators. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2140-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032423.

    PMID: 15152059BACKGROUND
  • Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, Tavazzi L; Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure (CARE-HF) Study Investigators. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005 Apr 14;352(15):1539-49. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050496. Epub 2005 Mar 7.

    PMID: 15753115BACKGROUND
  • Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, Delurgio DB, Leon AR, Loh E, Kocovic DZ, Packer M, Clavell AL, Hayes DL, Ellestad M, Trupp RJ, Underwood J, Pickering F, Truex C, McAtee P, Messenger J; MIRACLE Study Group. Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 13;346(24):1845-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013168.

    PMID: 12063368BACKGROUND
  • Fornwalt BK, Sprague WW, BeDell P, Suever JD, Gerritse B, Merlino JD, Fyfe DA, Leon AR, Oshinski JN. Agreement is poor among current criteria used to define response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2010 May 11;121(18):1985-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.910778. Epub 2010 Apr 26.

    PMID: 20421518BACKGROUND
  • Butter C, Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Fleck E, Ding J, Yu Y, Huvelle E, Spinelli J; Pacing Therapy for Chronic Heart Failure II Study Group. Effect of resynchronization therapy stimulation site on the systolic function of heart failure patients. Circulation. 2001 Dec 18;104(25):3026-9. doi: 10.1161/hc5001.102229.

    PMID: 11748094BACKGROUND
  • Rossillo A, Verma A, Saad EB, Corrado A, Gasparini G, Marrouche NF, Golshayan AR, McCurdy R, Bhargava M, Khaykin Y, Burkhardt JD, Martin DO, Wilkoff BL, Saliba WI, Schweikert RA, Raviele A, Natale A. Impact of coronary sinus lead position on biventricular pacing: mortality and echocardiographic evaluation during long-term follow-up. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004 Oct;15(10):1120-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.04089.x.

    PMID: 15485432BACKGROUND
  • Merchant FM, Heist EK, McCarty D, Kumar P, Das S, Blendea D, Ellinor PT, Mela T, Picard MH, Ruskin JN, Singh JP. Impact of segmental left ventricle lead position on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2010 May;7(5):639-44. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.01.035. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

    PMID: 20298819BACKGROUND
  • Mullens W, Verga T, Grimm RA, Starling RC, Wilkoff BL, Tang WHW. Persistent hemodynamic benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy with disease progression in advanced heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Feb 17;53(7):600-607. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.079.

    PMID: 19215835BACKGROUND
  • Blendea D, Singh JP. Lead positioning strategies to enhance response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Fail Rev. 2011 May;16(3):291-303. doi: 10.1007/s10741-010-9212-4.

    PMID: 21184174BACKGROUND
  • Duckett SG, Ginks M, Shetty AK, Bostock J, Gill JS, Hamid S, Kapetanakis S, Cunliffe E, Razavi R, Carr-White G, Rinaldi CA. Invasive acute hemodynamic response to guide left ventricular lead implantation predicts chronic remodeling in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 6;58(11):1128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.042.

    PMID: 21884950BACKGROUND
  • Bogaard MD, Houthuizen P, Bracke FA, Doevendans PA, Prinzen FW, Meine M, van Gelder BM. Baseline left ventricular dP/dtmax rather than the acute improvement in dP/dtmax predicts clinical outcome in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Oct;13(10):1126-32. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr094. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

    PMID: 21791536BACKGROUND
  • Butter C, Stellbrink C, Belalcazar A, Villalta D, Schlegl M, Sinha A, Cuesta F, Reister C. Cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization by finger plethysmography. Heart Rhythm. 2004 Nov;1(5):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.07.002.

    PMID: 15851221BACKGROUND
  • Whinnett ZI, Davies JE, Willson K, Chow AW, Foale RA, Davies DW, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Mayet J. Determination of optimal atrioventricular delay for cardiac resynchronization therapy using acute non-invasive blood pressure. Europace. 2006 May;8(5):358-66. doi: 10.1093/europace/eul017.

    PMID: 16635996BACKGROUND
  • Whinnett ZI, Davies JE, Willson K, Manisty CH, Chow AW, Foale RA, Davies DW, Hughes AD, Mayet J, Francis DP. Haemodynamic effects of changes in atrioventricular and interventricular delay in cardiac resynchronisation therapy show a consistent pattern: analysis of shape, magnitude and relative importance of atrioventricular and interventricular delay. Heart. 2006 Nov;92(11):1628-34. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.080721. Epub 2006 May 18.

    PMID: 16709698BACKGROUND
  • Bocchiardo M, Meyer zu Vilsendorf D, Militello C, Lippert M, Czygan G, Schauerte P, Gaita F, Stellbrink C. Resynchronization therapy optimization by intracardiac impedance. Europace. 2010 Nov;12(11):1589-95. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq273. Epub 2010 Jul 28.

    PMID: 20667892BACKGROUND
  • Turcott RG, Witteles RM, Wang PJ, Vagelos RH, Fowler MB, Ashley EA. Measurement precision in the optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ Heart Fail. 2010 May;3(3):395-404. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.109.900076. Epub 2010 Feb 22.

    PMID: 20176716BACKGROUND
  • Jia P, Ramanathan C, Ghanem RN, Ryu K, Varma N, Rudy Y. Electrocardiographic imaging of cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: observation of variable electrophysiologic responses. Heart Rhythm. 2006 Mar;3(3):296-310. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.11.025.

    PMID: 16500302BACKGROUND
  • Shetty AK, Duckett SG, Ma YL, Kapetanakis S, Ginks M, Bostock J, Carr-White G, Rhode K, Razavi R, Rinaldi CA. The acute hemodynamic response to LV pacing within individual branches of the coronary sinus using a quadripolar lead. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Feb;35(2):196-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03268.x. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

    PMID: 22126664BACKGROUND
  • Tysler M, Kneppo P, Turzova M, Svehlikova J, Karas S, Heblakova E, Hana K, Filipova S. Noninvasive assessment of local myocardium repolarization changes using high resolution surface ECG mapping. Physiol Res. 2007;56 Suppl 1:S133-S141. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.931312. Epub 2007 May 31.

    PMID: 17552884BACKGROUND
  • van Deursen C, van Geldorp IE, Rademakers LM, van Hunnik A, Kuiper M, Klersy C, Auricchio A, Prinzen FW. Left ventricular endocardial pacing improves resynchronization therapy in canine left bundle-branch hearts. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009 Oct;2(5):580-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.846022. Epub 2009 Aug 10.

    PMID: 19843927BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart FailureBundle-Branch Block

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesHeart BlockArrhythmias, CardiacCardiac Conduction System DiseasePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, Ph.d

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2013

First Posted

November 27, 2013

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion

April 1, 2015

Study Completion

April 1, 2015

Last Updated

March 31, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-03

Locations