Resynchronization Therapy
5
0
0
4
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 5 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 4 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 4 completed trials
Clinical Trials (5)
REstoration of SYNChronous Cardiac Function Due to Physiologic cArdiac Pacing Modalities With Clinical Endpoints
Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Resynchronization Therapy in Systolic Dysfunction and Wide QRS: CONSYST-CRT.
Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac ResYNChronization
LEft VEntricuLar Activation Time Shortening With Physiological Pacing vs Biventricular Resynchronization Therapy
Acute Feedback on Left ventrIcular Lead Implantation Location for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy