Graded Motor Imagery for Patients Within a Year After Stroke.
GMI
The Effect of a Graded Motor Imagery Approach for Stroke Patients Within a Year After Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to evaluate whether a graded rehabilitation approach including Implicit and explicit motor imagery training and mirror therapy is more effective than other treatments commonly provided in a neuro-rehabilitation department.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Sep 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedApril 4, 2016
April 1, 2016
2.1 years
November 13, 2013
April 1, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Wolf's Motor Function Test (WMFT)
It includes 17 different tasks, which assess shoulder, elbow, wrist function and manual ability. For each task, a qualitative mark is given and time needed to complete the action is recorded.
before and after the 4-weeks treatment
Change in Fugl Meyer Assessment Scale for upper extremity (FMA)
We use the Upper Extremity session of the scale. The scale evaluates patient's balance, passive and active movements of shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. It also evaluates different types of grips. Sense of position and ability to detect light touches are also evaluated.
Before and after the 4-weeks treatment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
before and after the 4-weeks treatment
Change in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
before and after the 4-weeks treatment
Study Arms (2)
Graded Motor Imagery
EXPERIMENTALStandard treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
GMI program includes three steps: Implicit Motor Imagery (IMI); Explicit Motor Imagery (EMI) and Mirror Box Therapy (MT). IMI included a training based on Hand Laterality Discrimination Tasks. During these tasks 60 pictures of right and left hands are projected randomly on a 15" screen. Patients are asked to choose whether the images seen are right or left and therefore to click respectively the right or the left button on a mouse. EMI training consists in imagining a movement without actual performing it. It will be introduced during IMI's last two sessions and gradually enhanced increasing the complexity of motor skills to be imagined. The therapist shows or explains in details the movements the patient have to mentally rehearsed. MT treatments will start with simply watching the unaffected hand in the mirror and increased toward functional movement. When possible, gentle movement with the affected hand will be encouraged behind the reflecting part of the mirror.
Patients will undergo to a standard treatment, that is thought to be the best option for that specific patients. In our hospital, treatment options include: motor training, functional training, occupational therapy, bilateral arm training or motor treatment using virtual reality devices.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within a year from the event;
- age of participant between 21 and 85 years old;
- absence of apraxia or global aphasia;
- Mini-Mental State Examination score \>23.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of other neurological or orthopaedic disorders affecting upper extremity motor function,
- Neglect,
- Significant spasticity defined as a score ≥ 24 total points at Tardieu Rating Scale (TRS)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
IRCCS Ospedale San Camillo
Venice, Italy, 30126, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Andrea Turolla, MSc
IRCCS Ospedale San Camillo
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MSc
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2013
First Posted
November 25, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 4, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04