The Utility of Intensified Case Finding Combined With a Package of Novel TB Diagnostics Using a Mobile Clinic in Africa
XACT
1 other identifier
interventional
875
4 countries
4
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare two different methods of intensified tuberculosis (TB) case finding in the community. These methods all involve the use of a mobile clinic to reach people with TB symptoms who are not able to readily access clinic services. A standard diagnostics package consisting of smear microscopy and culture (with smear result available the next day) will be compared with a novel diagnostics package involving point-of-care sputum GeneXpert MTB/RIF performed at a mobile or conventional clinic (with same day result), sputum culture, and lateral flow urinary lipoarabinomannan (LAM) testing (in HIV +ve subjects only). The primary outcome is a comparison between the number of culture +ve subjects on TB treatment in each group at the end of two months. A secondary aim is an evaluation of the accuracy and feasibility of GeneXpert performed in a mobile clinic. Additional study aims include using chest X-rays obtained during the study to develop and validate of an computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software package for TB (together with collaborators in the Netherlands), as well as establishing whether LAM is detectable at sub-ELISA concentrations in the urine of those with TB.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2013
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 24, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedNovember 25, 2015
November 1, 2015
1.5 years
October 24, 2013
November 24, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of novel intensive-case finding diagnostic tools to standard intensive-case finding strategy
The proportion of culture-positive TB cases initiating TB treatment in each study arm.
2 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
The proportion of culture-positive TB cases completing TB treatment in each study arm
6 months
Feasibility of performing Xpert MTB/RIF at the point-of-care in a mobile unit using an alternative power supply
6 months
Cost per TB case detected between study arms
6 months
Cost per TB case successfully completing treatment between study arms
6 months
Determining whether LAM is present at sub-ELISA concentrations using mass spectroscopy of urine samples from TB patients
6 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Novel
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this arm will receive 3 sputum samples for GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay and MGIT liquid TB culture.
Standard
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this arm will receive 2 sputum samples for fluorescence smear microscopy and MGIT liquid TB culture.
Interventions
Automated nucleic-acid amplification test (fully integrated) test for TB
Smear microscopy involve sputum smear with either ziehl-neelsen or auramine-O staining of slides and light or fluorescence microscopy reading
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Community participant willing to complete community-based symptom screening, urine testing and/or undergo TB diagnostic tests at the local TB clinic.
- Provision of informed consent.
- HIV-negative adults (older than 18 years) with 1 or more of the following:
- cough ≥ 2 weeks
- loss of weight
- persistent fever ≥ 2 weeks and/or
- a single recorded temp \> 38°C
- night sweats
- generalized fatigue
- hemoptysis or
- chest pain
- Any HIV+ve adult (older than 18 years).
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to provide informed consent (e.g. mentally impaired).
- Patients self-presenting to the TB clinics.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Cape Townlead
- University of Zimbabwecollaborator
- Università degli Studi di Sassaricollaborator
- Radboud University Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (4)
University of Sassari
Sassari, 07100, Italy
Radboud University
Nijmegen, 6500 HB, Netherlands
University of Cape Town
Cape Town, Western Province, 7945, South Africa
University of Zimbabwe
Harare, P O Box A178 Avondale, Zimbabwe
Related Publications (1)
Calligaro GL, Zijenah LS, Peter JG, Theron G, Buser V, McNerney R, Bara W, Bandason T, Govender U, Tomasicchio M, Smith L, Mayosi BM, Dheda K. Effect of new tuberculosis diagnostic technologies on community-based intensified case finding: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Apr;17(4):441-450. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30384-X. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
PMID: 28063795DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Keertan Dheda, MBChB, PhD
University of Cape Town
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor and Head, Lung Infection and Immunity Unit
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 24, 2013
First Posted
November 21, 2013
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
April 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
November 25, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11