NCT01987635

Brief Summary

Mitral valve reconstruction commonly requires the use of an anuloplasty device to assure long-term durability of the repair. Among mitral anuloplasty devices, varying from rigid to complete flexible ring substitutes, the most recent ones are aimed to restore the natural saddle shape of the mitral annulus, in order to decrease the stress tension on both mitral leaflets and chordal attachments. So far, even for flexible ring devices, the sustained flexibility of the device remained unproven, probably by cicatricial fibrotic tissue ingrowth after implantation. Due to specific structural characteristics based on a nitinolstent with carbofilm-coating, the MEMO 3D ring device of SORIN claims preservation of the ring flexibility during the cardiac cyclus. Consequently, mitral anuloplasty with this device is expected to decrease the stress during the systolo-diastolic movements of the valve, and so, improve the late durability of the repair. Echocardiography is the first-line technique for mitral valve assessment after surgical repair, for both intra-operative evaluation and serial follow-up of valve function. Recently, three-dimensional echocardiography has been introduced into clinical practice, affording qualitative and quantitative measurement of mitral valve function and size during the cardiac cycle.This method allows to quantify precisely the excursion of the mitral annulus between systole and diastole. The aim of this study is to analyse the systolo-diastolic movement of the mitral annulus after the use of an anuloplasty with the SORIN MEMO 3D device, after surgical implantation and its sustainability, 1 year after implantation. This hypothesis is tested in a case-controlled comparison with a standard used rigid ring device. Therefore, 3-D echocardiography will be performed at the time of surgical repair, and after 1 year, to define the size and surface change of the mitral anuloplasty device during the cardiac cycle. Based on a sample size calculation, 10 patients in each comparison group will be included, suggesting a study cohort of 20 patients eligible for mitral valve repair.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
33

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2014

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 12, 2013

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 19, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 16, 2014

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 13, 2016

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 28, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

December 9, 2022

Status Verified

December 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

November 12, 2013

Last Update Submit

December 6, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Mitral valve diseaseprimarily regurgitationnecessitating surgical repair

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Difference of diameters and surface of the anuloplasty device between systolic and diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle in the MEMO 3D device, compared to another rigid ring device.

    Difference of antero-posterior diameter, latero-lateral diameter and surface of the anuloplasty device between systolic and diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle in the MEMO 3D device, compared to another rigid ring device. The measurements are done with the use of 3-D echocardiography

    intra-operatively

  • Difference of diameters and surface of the anuloplasty device between systolic and diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle in the MEMO 3D device, compared to another rigid ring device.

    Difference of antero-posterior diameter, latero-lateral diameter and surface of the anuloplasty device between systolic and diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle in the MEMO 3D device, compared to another rigid ring device. The measurements are done with the use of 3-D echocardiography

    1 year after implantation.

Study Arms (2)

MEMO 3D anuloplasty ring

EXPERIMENTAL

MEMO 3D anuloplasty ring

Device: MEMO 3D ringProcedure: 3D Echocardiography

rigid ring

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

rigid ring

Device: Standard use of rigid ring.Procedure: 3D Echocardiography

Interventions

The experimental MEMO 3D ring is placed.

MEMO 3D anuloplasty ring

The rigid ring is placed, which is standard procedure.

rigid ring
MEMO 3D anuloplasty ringrigid ring

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ghent University Hospital

Ghent, 9000, Belgium

Location

Related Links

Study Officials

  • Guy Vandenplas, MD

    University Hospital, Ghent

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2013

First Posted

November 19, 2013

Study Start

January 16, 2014

Primary Completion

September 13, 2016

Study Completion

September 28, 2018

Last Updated

December 9, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-12

Locations