Barbed Suture in Single-port Laparoscopic Myomectomy
Single-port Laparoscopic Myomectomy Using Barbed Suture Versus Multi-port One: a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to test our hypothesis that the use of unidirectional knotless barbed suture in single-port laparoscopic myomectomy could facilitate the suture of uterine wall defect after myoma enucleation as multi-port laparoscopic myomectomy did.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Nov 2013
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 3, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 15, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedJuly 31, 2015
July 1, 2015
1.1 years
November 3, 2013
July 30, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Suturing time
the time duration for the suture of uterine wall defect after myoma enucleation during laparoscopic myomectomy
Intra-operative
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Cosmetic satisfaction
Post-surgery 1 month and 3 month
Study Arms (2)
Single-port laparoscopic myomectomy
EXPERIMENTALWe will use barbed suture (V-Loc) under intervention of single-port laparoscopic myomectomy
Multi-port laparoscopic myomectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORWe will use barbed suture(V-Loc) under intervention of multi-port laparoscopic myomectomy.
Interventions
The aim of this study is to compare single-port laparoscopic myomectomy using barbed suture (experimental group) with multi-port laparoscopic myomectomy using barbed suture (control group) in terms of operative time (esp. suturing time).
The aim of this study is to compare single-port laparoscopic myomectomy using barbed suture (experimental group) with multi-port laparoscopic myomectomy using barbed suture(control group) in terms of operative time (esp. suturing time).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 55 years
- Image-confirmed uterine myoma
- Number of myoma ≤2 and largest size ≤10cm
- Women who were scheduled to have laparoscopic myomectomy
- Appropriate medical status for laparoscopic surgery (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification 1 or 2)
You may not qualify if:
- Women with pedunculated subserosal myoma or submucosal myoma
- Women undergoing concomitant complex surgical procedures at the time of laparoscopic myomectomy such as severe adhesiolysis or resection for severe endometriosis
- Women with any suggestion of malignant uterine or adnexal diseases
- Women with diabetics, malignancy, or malnutrition, which can affect wound healing
- Women having major medical comorbidity or psychiatric illness, which could affect follow-up and/or compliance
- Women who refuse to participate or give consent to the procedures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- CHA Universitylead
Study Sites (4)
National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital
Goyang, South Korea
CHA Gangnam Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Song T, Kim TJ, Lee SH, Kim TH, Kim WY. Laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic myomectomy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2015 Nov;104(5):1325-31. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1137. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
PMID: 26263079DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Taejong Song, MD
CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA university, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 2013
First Posted
November 15, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
July 31, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-07