Study of Different Pain Scores in Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Randomized Controlled Study of Different Pain Scores in Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose: The attempt to further reduce the operative trauma in laparoscopic hysterectomy led in new technique such as Single-Port Access (SPA) laparoscopic surgery. This new technique is considered as painless procedure and better cosmetic effect but there are not any publications to study a possible different pain score and cosmetic effect in new techniques versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy. In this randomized controlled study the researchers have investigated the pain scores and cosmetic satisfaction by modified body image scale and cosmetic scar scale.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jan 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedJuly 20, 2011
July 1, 2011
11 months
February 5, 2010
July 18, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain score measured by visual analog scale
postoperative 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Modified body image scale and cosmetic scar scale
postoperative 6 months
Study Arms (2)
conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThree or four ports conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy
SPA laparoscopic hysterectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORSingle umbilical incision laparoscopic hysterectomy
Interventions
conventional 3 or 4 ports laparoscopic hysterectomy
single-port access laparoscopic hysterectomy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 30-60, female
- Symptomatic (Dysmenorrhea, Palpable mass, Pelvic pain or discomfort, Urinary symptom, Increasing size, Menorrhagia) myomas or adenomyosis
- Suspected uterine myoma and/or adenomyosis on transvaginal ultrasonography (USG)
- At least a 6-month thorough follow-up record available
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Endometrial hyperplasia without myoma or adenomyosis
- Body Mass Index more than 30
- Huge uterus defined by longitudinal uterine diameter larger than 10cm and anteroposterior diameter larger than 8cm in USG
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 135-710, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2010
First Posted
February 8, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
July 20, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-07