Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Multi-institution, Randomized Trial for Efficacy and Safety of Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterine Myoma or Adenomyosis
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
8
Brief Summary
Multi-center prospective randomized trial of single port laparoscopic surgery (SILS) versus conventional 3-4 ports laparoscopic hysterectomy. Hypothesis is that conversion rate of SILS is not inferior to that of conventional approach.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Dec 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2013
CompletedFebruary 22, 2012
November 1, 2011
1 year
November 29, 2011
February 20, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Conversion rate
Conversion means that events required additional port(s) or open laparotomy
1 week
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)
12 weeks
Postoperative pain
postop. 1 day, 1 week
Study Arms (2)
SILS
EXPERIMENTALLaparoscopic hysterectomy including LAVH, LH(a), and TLH using SILS port
Conventional multi-port laparoscopic hysterectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATOR3-4 ports laparoscopic hysterectomy including LAVH, LH(a), or TLH
Interventions
3-4 conventional ports
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Symptomatic (dysmenorrhea, palpable mass, pelvic pain or discomfort urinary symptom, increasing size, menorrhagia) myomas or adenomyomas
- Uterine size \< gestational age of 14 weeks
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Medical diseases such as heart failure, renal insufficiency, liver cirrhosis, pancreatitis, uncontrolled DM
- Huge uterine size \> gestational age of 14 weeks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital
Deagu, South Korea
Catholic Incheon Hospital
Incheon, South Korea
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 135-710, South Korea
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Kangnam Cha Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Seoul Catholic Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Yonsei University Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Seoul University Bundang Hospital
Seungnam, South Korea
Related Publications (4)
Kim TJ, Lee YY, Cha HH, Kim CJ, Choi CH, Lee JW, Bae DS, Lee JH, Kim BG. Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2248-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0944-y. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
PMID: 20177921BACKGROUNDLee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, Kang H, Choi CH, Lee JW, Kim BG, Lee JH, Bae DS. Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):450-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.022. Epub 2009 May 31.
PMID: 19487164BACKGROUNDJung YW, Lee M, Yim GW, Lee SH, Paek JH, Kwon HY, Nam EJ, Kim SW, Kim YT. A randomized prospective study of single-port and four-port approaches for hysterectomy in terms of postoperative pain. Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2462-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1567-z. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
PMID: 21298522BACKGROUNDChen YJ, Wang PH, Ocampo EJ, Twu NF, Yen MS, Chao KC. Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):906-912. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820c666a.
PMID: 21422864BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chi-Heum Cho, MD, PhD
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2011
First Posted
December 1, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
March 1, 2013
Last Updated
February 22, 2012
Record last verified: 2011-11