Adductor Canal Block and Effect of 10 Versus 30 ml Ropivacaine on Muscle Strength: a Randomized Study in Healthy Volunteers
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To investigate whether reducing the volume (30 versus 10 ml) ropivacaine injected can reduce the number of subjects with impaired muscle strength following adductor canal block. We hypothesized that adductor canal block with 10 ml 0.1% ropivacaine preserves quadriceps strength compared with an adductor canal block with 30 ml.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Nov 2013
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 11, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedJanuary 10, 2014
January 1, 2014
1 month
November 5, 2013
January 9, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of subjects with reduced quadriceps strength
The difference between the two volumes in number of subjects experiencing a reduction in quadriceps muscle strength by more than 25% from baseline in two consecutive assessments.
0.5 to 6 hours post block
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Quadriceps strength in percentage of baseline
2, 3 and 4 hours post block
Quadriceps strength calculated as AUC
30 minutes to 6 hours post block
Modified 30-second Chair Stand test
2 and 4 hours post block
VAS pain scores during warmth stimulation
Mean value for the periode 30 minutes - 6 hours post block
Study Arms (2)
30 ml
EXPERIMENTAL30 ml ropivacaine 0.1%, single bolus
10 ml
EXPERIMENTAL10 ml 0.1% ropivacaine, single bolus
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years
- Men
- ASA 1
- Body Mass Index 18-25
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to study medication
- Earlier trauma or surgery to the lower limb
- Diabetes Mellitus
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
Related Publications (2)
Jaeger P, Grevstad U, Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Sauter AR, Sorensen JK, Dahl JB. Does dexamethasone have a perineural mechanism of action? A paired, blinded, randomized, controlled study in healthy volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Nov;117(5):635-641. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew318.
PMID: 27799178DERIVEDJaeger P, Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Hilsted KL, Fabritius ML, Dahl JB. Adductor Canal Block With 10 mL Versus 30 mL Local Anesthetics and Quadriceps Strength: A Paired, Blinded, Randomized Study in Healthy Volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;40(5):553-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000298.
PMID: 26237001DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pia Jaeger, MD
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2013
First Posted
November 11, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
January 10, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-01