Chlorhexidine Gluconate Versus Povidone Iodine at Cesarean Delivery: a Randomized Controlled Trial
To Determine the Difference in Positive Bacterial Cultures in Cesarean Sections With 2% Chlorhexidine- Gluconate, 70% Isopropyl Alcohol (Chloraprep) vs. Povidone-iodine 10% (Betadine) Preoperative Surgical Scrub
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Currently there are no published studies comparing the efficacy of Chloraprep and povidone-iodine in decreasing postoperative- wound infection in cesarean sections. However, there have been studies involving other types of surgery that have compared the efficacy of different types of preoperative cleansing agents in preventing postoperative wound infection. These studies have shown that controversy exists over which antiseptic skin preparation is the most effective for preventing postoperative surgical wound infections. The standard of care at Los Angeles County Hospital for preoperative skin antiseptic in cesarean sections is povidone- iodine 10% (betadine), however many other hospitals have made the transition to using Chloraprep. In an attempt to improve on the current standard of care, we propose a quality improvement prospective randomized study to compare the difference in postoperative wound complications with the use of povidone- iodine and Chloraprep as a preoperative antiseptic in cesarean sections. We hypothesize that Chloraprep will be better than Betadine at reducing the incidence of positive bacterial cultures following cesarean sections.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable pregnancy
Started Jan 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable pregnancy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 5, 2013
CompletedNovember 5, 2013
October 1, 2013
2.2 years
October 23, 2013
October 28, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To compare the difference in the number of positive bacterial cultures at the site of the incision after preoperative cleansing with povidone iodine and Chloraprep.
3 min-18 days after skin preparation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To compare the difference in postoperative wound infections measured by the presence of purulent drainage, temp greater than 100.4 F, induration at the site of incision with the use of povidone-iodine and Chloraprep.
Post operative days 0-18
Study Arms (2)
Chlorhexidine Gluconate
EXPERIMENTALUse of Chlorhexidine Gluconate as skin disinfectant for cesarean section.
Povidone Iodine
EXPERIMENTALUse of Povidone Iodine as skin disinfectant for cesarean section.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant women greater than 36 weeks gestation presenting for scheduled repeat cesarean sections and scheduled primary cesarean sections
- Ages 18-45
- Written informed consent obtained
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are taking antimicrobial therapy for any reason
- Patient with a known allergy to one or both of the prepping agents
- Patients currently taking immunosuppressant drugs
- Active acute or chronic infection
- Current history of cancer
- Open wounds, skin ulcers, sores, and severe acne
- History of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus colonization or oxacillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus colonization
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90027, United States
Related Publications (1)
Hadiati DR, Hakimi M, Nurdiati DS, Masuzawa Y, da Silva Lopes K, Ota E. Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 25;6(6):CD007462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007462.pub5.
PMID: 32580252DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cynelle M. Kunkle, MD
University of Southern California
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ramen Chmait, MD
University of Southern California
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Clinical Obstetrics&Gynecology, Pediatrics, and Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2013
First Posted
November 5, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2012
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
November 5, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-10