Comparison of Staples Versus Prolene Suture for Skin Closure at Cesarean Delivery
Comparison of Staples Versus Nonabsorbable Subcuticular (Prolene) Suture for Skin Closure in Cesarean Deliveries: A Randomized Study
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Currently different materials are used to close the skin after a cesarean delivery, including absorbable suture, non-absorbable suture and staples. It is not known what is the best choice of material to close the skin after a cesarean section, but commonly staples or dissolvable suture is used. Recently plastic surgeons have found that non-dissolvable suture may have a better cosmetic outcome than staples. The investigators hope to learn if there is a difference in pain both at suture/staple removal and 6 weeks postoperatively between Prolene suture, Absorbable suture (monocryl or vicryl) or staples. The investigators also plan to look for differences in wound complications and patient satisfaction, as well as operating and removal times. This knowledge will be important in helping practitioners choose the closure technique at cesarean delivery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable pregnancy
Started Jan 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 5, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 4, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 4, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 4, 2019
CompletedMarch 4, 2019
November 1, 2018
1.3 years
January 5, 2012
November 1, 2018
November 1, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Level of Pain on a Scale During the Post-operative Hospitalization Period
Pain level on a Mosby visual analog pain scale of 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
Post-operative day 3 or 4.
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Level of Pain on a Scale at 6 Weeks Postpartum
Post-operative week 6
Count of Participants With Wound Complications
Post-operative week 6
Level of Patient Satisfaction to the Wound Appearance
Post-operative day 3 or 4
Level of Patient Satisfaction to the Wound Appearance at 6 Weeks Postpartum
Post-operative week 6
Time From Skin Incision to the Skin Closure
Day of cesarean delivery (up to 8 hours)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Staples
ACTIVE COMPARATORUse of staples for skin closure at cesarean section
Prolene non-absorbable sutures
ACTIVE COMPARATORUse of Prolene non-absorbable sutures for skin closure at cesarean section
Absorbable sutures
ACTIVE COMPARATORUse of absorbable sutures for skin closure at cesarean section; monocryl or vicryl.
Interventions
Staples for closure of cesarean section skin incision
Prolene non-absorbable sutures for closure of cesarean skin incision
Absorbable sutures for closure of cesarean skin incision
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant women undergoing primary or repeat cesarean section
- Maternal age greater than or equal to 18 years of age
- Gestational age greater than or equal to 34 weeks
- Elective and non-elective cesarean section
You may not qualify if:
- Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes
- BMI greater than 35
- Pre-operative diagnosis of chorioamnionitis
- History of drug or alcohol abuse
- Contraindication to NSAIDs
- Chronic pain diagnosis
- Narcotic use prior to pregnancy
- Maternal age less than 18 years of age
- General anesthesia
- Chorioamnionitis, clinical suspicion of chorioamnionitis, or risk factors for chorioamnionitis (membrane rupture greater than 18 hours, GBS positive status)
- Vertical skin incision
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lucile Packard Childrens Hospital
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Research Operations Manager
- Organization
- Stanford University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Natali Aziz, MD
Stanford University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 5, 2012
First Posted
January 13, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 4, 2013
Study Completion
May 4, 2013
Last Updated
March 4, 2019
Results First Posted
March 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share