NCT01076062

Brief Summary

Primary outcome: to evaluate the effect of elective induction of labor (IOL), at 39 weeks gestation, on cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous women compared to expectant management (EM). Secondary outcomes: to evaluate differences in the mean number of clinic visits/antepartum tests avoided with IOL, to compare the differences in utilization of inpatient resources (mean duration of inpatient stay, mean duration of labor), and to evaluate the effect of IOL on the risk of urinary/anal incontinence and sexual dysfunction as analyzed using previously validated measurements. We will evaluate differences in the rate of cervical change once active labor is diagnosed, and the time from completion of active labor, defined as complete dilation and complete effacement, to the delivery of fetus (definition of second stage of active labor). Furthermore, other secondary outcomes to be evaluated include comparisons between IOL and EM in regards to the occurence of chorioamnionitis, stillbirth, operative vaginal delivery, and meconium stained amniotic fluid. An evaluation of the predictive value of cervical length and Bishop score for vaginal delivery will also be examined.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
162

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pregnancy

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2009

Longer than P75 for not_applicable pregnancy

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 27, 2009

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 24, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 25, 2010

Completed
7.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 24, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 24, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

February 11, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7.5 years

First QC Date

February 24, 2010

Last Update Submit

February 7, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Pregnancy MaintenanceLabor, Inducedspontaneous laborcesarean delivery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Cesarean Birth Rate

    39 weeks gestation

Study Arms (2)

Expectant management (EM) arm

NO INTERVENTION

Standard of care: routine clinic appointments until they deliver, fetal heart rate and contraction monitoring during their 41st week if not delivered. Also if they have not gone into labor the subjects will be scheduled for an induction by 42 weeks.

Induction of Labor (IOL) arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks.

Procedure: Induction of Labor

Interventions

If cervical foley bulb placement is possible, the foley bulb will remain in place until either spontaneously removed or after 12 hrs, whichever is earlier. If placement is not possible, cervical ripening with misoprostol 25 micrograms (mcg) per vagina every 4 hrs (max of 4 total doses) will be initiated. Cervical examination will occur every 4 hr. Repeat doses of misoprostol will be given only if foley bulb placement is not possible and/or if palpably firm uterine contractions are less than 6 in 10 min in consecutive 10 min intervals. Once placement of a cervical foley bulb can be performed, oxytocin administration will begin at 2 mIU/min and increasing by 2 mIU/min every 20 min to ensure adequate contractions (maximum oxytocin infusion rate 36 mIU/min). Adequate contractions will be defined as 7 contractions in 15 min in consecutive 15 min intervals that palpate moderate to firm. Oxytocin infusion will begin not earlier than 4 hrs after the last misoprostol dose (if given).

Also known as: misoprostol, oxytocin
Induction of Labor (IOL) arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Nulliparous patients evaluated at 38 weeks gestation without contraindication for induction of labor, and
  • Patients who meet dating criteria as outlined above, and
  • Patients who have a Bishop score of ≤ 5.

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindication to induction of labor,
  • Scheduled induction of labor for medical indications, and/or
  • Failure to meet dating criteria above, Bishop score of \> 5.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Madigan Army Medical Center

Tacoma, Washington, 98431, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4.

  • Middleton P, Shepherd E, Morris J, Crowther CA, Gomersall JC. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 15;7(7):CD004945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub5.

  • Miller NR, Cypher RL, Foglia LM, Pates JA, Nielsen PE. Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):1258-1264. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001154.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Labor, InducedMisoprostolOxytocin

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Delivery, ObstetricObstetric Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeProstaglandins E, SyntheticProstaglandins, SyntheticProstaglandinsEicosanoidsFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFatty AcidsLipidsAutacoidsInflammation MediatorsBiological FactorsPituitary Hormones, PosteriorPituitary HormonesPeptide HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Study Officials

  • Nathaniel R Miller, MD

    Madigan Army Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Peter Nielsen, MD

    Madigan Army Medical Center

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Maternal Fetal Medicine Fellow

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2010

First Posted

February 25, 2010

Study Start

October 27, 2009

Primary Completion

April 24, 2017

Study Completion

April 24, 2017

Last Updated

February 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Locations