Manual Diaphragm Release Technique Effects On Tidal Volume in Elderly
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Question: Does manual diaphragm release change kinematics and respiratory function of elderly subjects? Design: Randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation and double-blinding. Participants: 17 volunteers over 60 years old randomized into two groups: 09 in the Control Group (CG) and 08 in the Intervention Group (IG). Intervention: The manual diaphragm release technique was used on the IG, in two sets of ten deep breaths, with a one minute interval between them. The CG underwent a sham protocol (light touch), with same sets and time of interval. Outcome measures: The groups were evaluated using spirometry, manovacuometry and optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP), in that order, before and immediately after the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable healthy
Started Jan 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 29, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 5, 2013
CompletedNovember 5, 2013
October 1, 2013
1 month
October 29, 2013
November 4, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compartmental chest wall distribution
The analysis of the regional distribution of respiratory volumes was done with Optoelectronic plethysmography (BTS Bioengineering, Italy), in which 89 reflective markers were adhered to the skin of volunteers using hypoallergenic adhesives, on particular anatomical points of the chest wall and abdomen (Aliverti and Pedotti 2003). The device emitted an infrared light on the reflective markers which was captured by eight cameras around the room, allowing the spatial determination of each marker. Thus, changes in lung volumes were calculated at each of the three compartments of the rib cage: pulmonary or upper ribcage (Rc, p), abdominal or lower ribcage (Rc, a) and abdomen (Ab). After the first OEP evaluation, a nontoxic, hypoallergenic pen was used to mark the placement of the dorsal reflective markers allowing the patient to lay in supine for the manual technique or the sham. The markers were then placed at the exact same anatomical points for reevaluation.
before first session
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures
Before first session
Pulmonary Function
Before first session
Study Arms (2)
Manual diaphragm release technique
EXPERIMENTALSham manual diaphragm release technique
OTHERInterventions
To perform the technique the volunteer was placed in supine position with limbs relaxed. Positioned behind the head of the volunteer, the therapist performed manual contact (pisiform, ulnar edge and the last three fingers) with the underside of the costal cartilage of the 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th rib, and guiding forearms toward the shoulders of the corresponding side. In the inspiratory phase, the therapist gently pulled the points of contact with both hands, in the direction of the head, yet slightly lateral, accompanying the elevation movement of the ribs. During exhalation, the therapist deepened contact toward the inner costal, maintaining resistance throughout the inspiratory phase. In the breaths following, the therapist sought to gain traction and smooth increase in the deepening of contacts. This maneuver was performed in two sets of ten deep breaths, with a one minute interval between them.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- over 60 years of age;
- a body mass index (BMI) below 30 kg/m2
- non-smokers, self-declared sedentary;
- presenting a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) greater than or equal to 80% of predicted;
- the ratio between these variables (FEV1/FVC) greater than 70% in spirometry
You may not qualify if:
- Showed the inability to understand verbal commands in the evaluation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Federal University of Pernambuco
Recife, Pernambuco, 52011000, Brazil
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Master
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 29, 2013
First Posted
November 5, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
February 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 5, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-10