NCT01975740

Brief Summary

Question: Does manual diaphragm release change kinematics and respiratory function of elderly subjects? Design: Randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation and double-blinding. Participants: 17 volunteers over 60 years old randomized into two groups: 09 in the Control Group (CG) and 08 in the Intervention Group (IG). Intervention: The manual diaphragm release technique was used on the IG, in two sets of ten deep breaths, with a one minute interval between them. The CG underwent a sham protocol (light touch), with same sets and time of interval. Outcome measures: The groups were evaluated using spirometry, manovacuometry and optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP), in that order, before and immediately after the intervention.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
18

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable healthy

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable healthy

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2013

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 29, 2013

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 5, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

November 5, 2013

Status Verified

October 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

October 29, 2013

Last Update Submit

November 4, 2013

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Compartmental chest wall distribution

    The analysis of the regional distribution of respiratory volumes was done with Optoelectronic plethysmography (BTS Bioengineering, Italy), in which 89 reflective markers were adhered to the skin of volunteers using hypoallergenic adhesives, on particular anatomical points of the chest wall and abdomen (Aliverti and Pedotti 2003). The device emitted an infrared light on the reflective markers which was captured by eight cameras around the room, allowing the spatial determination of each marker. Thus, changes in lung volumes were calculated at each of the three compartments of the rib cage: pulmonary or upper ribcage (Rc, p), abdominal or lower ribcage (Rc, a) and abdomen (Ab). After the first OEP evaluation, a nontoxic, hypoallergenic pen was used to mark the placement of the dorsal reflective markers allowing the patient to lay in supine for the manual technique or the sham. The markers were then placed at the exact same anatomical points for reevaluation.

    before first session

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures

    Before first session

  • Pulmonary Function

    Before first session

Study Arms (2)

Manual diaphragm release technique

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: The manual diaphragm release technique

Sham manual diaphragm release technique

OTHER
Other: Sham manual diaphragm release technique

Interventions

Sham manual diaphragm release technique

To perform the technique the volunteer was placed in supine position with limbs relaxed. Positioned behind the head of the volunteer, the therapist performed manual contact (pisiform, ulnar edge and the last three fingers) with the underside of the costal cartilage of the 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th rib, and guiding forearms toward the shoulders of the corresponding side. In the inspiratory phase, the therapist gently pulled the points of contact with both hands, in the direction of the head, yet slightly lateral, accompanying the elevation movement of the ribs. During exhalation, the therapist deepened contact toward the inner costal, maintaining resistance throughout the inspiratory phase. In the breaths following, the therapist sought to gain traction and smooth increase in the deepening of contacts. This maneuver was performed in two sets of ten deep breaths, with a one minute interval between them.

Manual diaphragm release technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years - 68 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • over 60 years of age;
  • a body mass index (BMI) below 30 kg/m2
  • non-smokers, self-declared sedentary;
  • presenting a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) greater than or equal to 80% of predicted;
  • the ratio between these variables (FEV1/FVC) greater than 70% in spirometry

You may not qualify if:

  • Showed the inability to understand verbal commands in the evaluation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Federal University of Pernambuco

Recife, Pernambuco, 52011000, Brazil

Location

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Master

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2013

First Posted

November 5, 2013

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion

February 1, 2013

Study Completion

February 1, 2013

Last Updated

November 5, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-10

Locations