Chronic Pain After Inguinal Hernia Repair, the ONSTEP Technique Versus the Laparoscopic Approach
ONLAP
1 other identifier
interventional
188
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair involving mesh placement with the Onstep-technique compared to mesh placement using a laparoscopic approach. The study hypothesis is that an even or smaller proportions of patients operated the Onstep technique will have chronic pain that impairs daily function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 9, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 11, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2017
CompletedFebruary 23, 2018
February 1, 2018
3.3 years
October 9, 2013
February 22, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Proportion of patients with substantial pain related impairment of function
At the 6 month follow up, all participants will be asked to fill out questionnaires regarding pain. Questionnaire used will assess degree of pain and degree of impairment on daily function.
6 month
Early postoperative pain
Early postoperative pain, measured on postoperative day 1, 2, 3 and 10 on the VAS for pain and compared between groups.
10 days
Pain related impairment of function at 12 months
At the 12 months follow up, all participants will be asked to fill out questionnaires regarding pain. Questionnaire used will assess degree of pain and degree of impairment on daily function.
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Onstep
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will have an inguinal hernia repair ad modum Onstep.
Laparoscopic repair
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this group will receive an inguinal hernia repair by use of a laparoscopic approach.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnose of a primary groin hernia that requires surgical intervention.
- Eligible for procedure performed under general anesthesia.
- Eligible for both laparoscopic and Onstep procedure.
You may not qualify if:
- Not able to understand Danish/Swedish, written and spoken.
- Emergency procedures.
- Previous inguinal hernia on ipsilateral side.
- ASA score more than 3.
- Irreducible inguinoscrotal hernia.
- Local or systemic infection.
- Contralateral hernia being operated at the same time or planned operated during follow-up.
- Other abdominal hernias being operated at the same time or planned operated during follow-up.
- Previous surgery that has impaired the sensation in the groin area.
- BMI \> 40 or \< 20.
- Daily intake of alcohol \>5 units, 1 unit = 12g pure alcohol.
- Known disease which impairs central or peripheral nerve function.
- Concurrent malignant disease.
- Impairment of cognitive function (e.g. dementia).
- Chronic pain that requires medication.
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Jacob Rosenberglead
Study Sites (1)
Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital
Herlev, Denmark
Related Publications (1)
Andresen K, Burcharth J, Rosenberg J. ONSTEP versus laparoscopy for inguinal hernia repair: protocol for a randomised clinical trial. Dan Med J. 2015 Dec;62(12):A5169.
PMID: 26621399DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jacob Rosenberg, Professor
University of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 9, 2013
First Posted
October 11, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 1, 2017
Study Completion
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02