NCT03247985

Brief Summary

Investigators are testing whether tacking mesh or self-fixating mesh used for inguinal hernia repair makes any difference in short-term pain or return to normal activities following the operation. Other studies have shown no significant difference in hernia recurrence rate when metal tacks are not used to hold the mesh in place.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
38

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2013

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2015

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 10, 2017

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 14, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 17, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

June 15, 2018

Status Verified

May 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

August 10, 2017

Results QC Date

October 19, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 17, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

MeshRepairPeritoneal

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Mean Operative Time

    Length of time needed to complete surgery.

    First incision to closure, approximately one hour

  • Number of Participants With Early Postoperative Complications

    Any complication which occurred within 30 days after the operation.

    Within 30 days

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Pain Score at Baseline

    baseline

  • Pain Score at One Week

    One Week Postoperative

  • Pain Score at Four Weeks

    Four Weeks Postoperative

Study Arms (2)

PROLENE Polypropylene Tacking Mesh

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will be randomized to Tacking Mesh for their inguinal hernia surgery.

Device: PROLENE Polypropylene Tacking Mesh

ProGrip Self-fixating Mesh

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will be randomized to Self-fixing mesh for their inguinal hernia surgery

Device: ProGrip Self-fixating Mesh

Interventions

Prolene mesh is a polypropylene plastic mesh (10 x 15 cm) implant fixed with titanium tacks

PROLENE Polypropylene Tacking Mesh

ProGrip™ self-fixating mesh is a tack-free fixation mesh for use in open \& laparoscopic hernia repairs. It is composed of absorbable Monofilament Polylactic Acid micro grips on one surface integrated with a lightweight Monofilament Polyethylene Terephthalate. The micro grips act as a kind of "Velcro" to the soft tissue surfaces resulting in self-fixation

ProGrip Self-fixating Mesh

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \- All patients regardless of sex or age who were diagnosed with a inguinal hernia and underwent a totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota from June 2013 - June 2014.

You may not qualify if:

  • \- Patients who did not elect to undergo a hernia repair or who elected to undergo a different type of hernia repair instead of a TEP procedure.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905-0001, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hernia, Inguinal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hernia, AbdominalHerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

The small sample size limits the power to reflect statistical differences. This study had a large number of bilateral repairs reflecting the inherent referral bias of our practice.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. David R. Farley
Organization
Mayo Clinic

Study Officials

  • David Farley

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2017

First Posted

August 14, 2017

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion

November 30, 2015

Study Completion

November 30, 2015

Last Updated

June 15, 2018

Results First Posted

November 17, 2017

Record last verified: 2018-05

Locations