NCT01954862

Brief Summary

Insufflation of the colon, usually with room air, is necessary to distend the lumen for exploration. Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation instead of room air insufflation (AI) has been shown to decrease symptoms of abdominal pain or discomfort during the procedure and particularly during the following 24 hours. CO2 is is rapidly absorbed by the intestinal mucosa and exhaled through respiration. AI colonoscopy has usually been the reference standard to compare colonoscopy using CO2 insufflation. In two recent articles AI was compared to either CO2 insufflation and Water-aided colonoscopy (WAC), which entails infusion of water to facilitate insertion to the cecum. WAC can be categorized broadly in Water Immersion (WI) and Water Exchange (WE). In WI water is infused during the insertion phase of colonoscopy, with removal of infused water predominantly during withdrawal. Occasional use of insufflation may be allowed. WE entails complete exclusion of insufflation, removal of residual colonic air pockets and feces, and suction of infused water predominantly during insertion to minimize distention. During the withdrawal phase insufflation is used to distend the colonic lumen. In the WAC arms of the two mentioned articles the insertion method used was WI, with infusion of water at room temperature or at 37°C. During withdrawal, air insufflation or either air or CO2 insufflation were employed. Compared to AI, CO2 insufflation and WI (using room air insufflation or CO2 insufflation during withdrawal) were effective in both studies in decreasing sedation requirement, pain and tolerance scores, with patients' higher willingness to repeat the procedure. Until now no direct comparison has been made within a single study about pain score during colonoscopy using AI, CO2 insufflation, WI/CO2, WE/CO2, WI/AI and WE/AI. In this study we test the hypothesis that, compared to AI, CO2 insufflation and WAC/CO2-AI methods will decrease pain score during colonoscopy, with reduction of sedation requirement, and that WE will achieve the best result. This comparative study has also the aim to test the respective peculiarities of each method.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
624

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2013

Geographic Reach
3 countries

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 27, 2013

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2013

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 7, 2013

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2014

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

July 31, 2014

Status Verified

July 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

September 27, 2013

Last Update Submit

July 30, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Water-aided colonoscopyWater Immersion colonoscopyWater Exchange colonoscopyCarbon-dioxide colonoscopyPainless unsedated colonoscopyAdenoma detection rateMean Adenomas per Procedure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Maximum pain score recorded during colonoscopy.

    Pain assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score 0=absence of pain, 2=simply "discomfort", 10=the worst possible pain. Before the procedure, an endoscopic nurse will explain the VAS scoring system to the patients. Every 60 seconds during colonoscopy patients will be asked about discomfort or pain. The responses will be recorded, and the maximum pain score noted.

    1 hour

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Overall pain after the procedure.

    1 hour.

  • Cecal intubation rate.

    1 hour

  • Cecal intubation time.

    1 hour.

  • Total procedure time.

    1 hour.

  • Adenoma detection rate.

    15 months.

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (9)

  • Position changes.

    1 hour.

  • Loop reduction maneuvers.

    1 hour.

  • Amount of water used during the procedure.

    1 hour.

  • +6 more other outcomes

Study Arms (6)

Air insufflation method.

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Colonoscopy performed in the standard fashion, with the minimal air insufflation required to aid insertion and allowing for washing as needed. Considered to be standard procedure.

Other: Air Insufflation method.

CO2 insufflation

EXPERIMENTAL

Colonoscopy performed with CO2 insufflation using the insufflation unit, allowing for washing as needed.

Other: CO2 insufflation

Water Immersion/CO2

EXPERIMENTAL

Infusion of water during the insertion phase of colonoscopy mainly to open the colonic lumen and progress to the cecum immersed in the water environment thus created, without attempting to clear the colon contents. Residual air in the colon will not be removed. Infused water and residual feces will be suctioned back predominantly during withdrawal. Insufflation not used until the cecum is reached. It will be allowed only 3 times and no more than 10 seconds each time (ITT failure if \>3) if the lumen cannot be seen. Withdrawal phase done using CO2 insufflation.

Other: Water Immersion/CO2

Water Exchange/CO2

EXPERIMENTAL

Insufflation not used until the cecum is reached. Infusion of a sufficient amount of water to render the lumen of the colon a slit to progress with the colonoscope. Part of the infused water will be constantly suctioned back exchanging clean for dirty or hazy water. Air pockets will be always aspirated to collapse the lumen. After cecal intubation as much residual water as possible will be aspirated before beginning the withdrawal phase. During withdrawal residual water and feces will be suctioned. Withdrawal phase done using CO2 insufflation.

Other: Water Exchange/CO2

Water Immersion/AI

EXPERIMENTAL

Infusion of water during the insertion phase of colonoscopy mainly to open the colonic lumen and progress to the cecum immersed in the water environment thus created, without attempting to clear the colon contents. Residual air in the colon will not be removed. Infused water and residual feces will be suctioned back predominantly during withdrawal. Insufflation not used until the cecum is reached. It will be allowed only 3 times and no more than 10 seconds each time (ITT failure if \>3) if the lumen cannot be seen. Withdrawal phase done using room air insufflation.

Other: Water Immersion/AI

Water Exchange/AI

EXPERIMENTAL

Insufflation not used until the cecum is reached. Infusion of a sufficient amount of water to render the lumen of the colon a slit to progress with the colonoscope. Part of the infused water will be constantly suctioned back exchanging clean for dirty or hazy water. Air pockets will be always aspirated to collapse the lumen. After cecal intubation as much residual water as possible will be aspirated before beginning the withdrawal phase. During withdrawal residual water and feces will be suctioned. Withdrawal phase done using room air insufflation.

Other: Water Exchange/AI

Interventions

Air Insufflation method.

Air insufflation method.

CO2 insufflation.

CO2 insufflation

Water Immersion during insertion, CO2 insufflation during withdrawal.

Water Immersion/CO2

Water Exchange during insertion, CO2 insufflation during withdrawal.

Water Exchange/CO2

Water Immersion during insertion, AI insufflation during withdrawal.

Water Immersion/AI

Water Exchange during insertion, AI insufflation during withdrawal.

Water Exchange/AI

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Consecutive 18 to 85 year-old diagnostic in-patients and outpatients agreeing to start procedure without premedication.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient unwillingness to start the procedure without sedation/analgesia
  • previous colorectal surgery
  • proctosigmoidoscopy or bidirectional endoscopy
  • patient refusal or inability to provide informed consent
  • inadequate assumption of bowel preparation
  • moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring oxygen
  • medical history of CO2 retention

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System

Los Angeles, California, 91343, United States

Location

Vìtkovice Hospital

Ostrava, 703 84, Czechia

Location

S. Barbara Hospital

Iglesias, CI, 09016, Italy

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Falt P, Liberda M, Smajstrla V, Kliment M, Bartkova A, Tvrdik J, Fojtik P, Urban O. Combination of water immersion and carbon dioxide insufflation for minimal sedation colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, single-center trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Aug;24(8):971-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283543f16.

    PMID: 22569079BACKGROUND
  • Amato A, Radaelli F, Paggi S, Baccarin A, Spinzi G, Terruzzi V. Carbon dioxide insufflation or warm-water infusion versus standard air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):511-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318279addd.

    PMID: 23478620BACKGROUND
  • Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C, Friedland S, Harker JO, Hsieh YH, Leung JW, Mann SK, Paggi S, Pohl J, Radaelli F, Ramirez FC, Siao-Salera R, Terruzzi V. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Sep;76(3):657-66. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.467.

    PMID: 22898423BACKGROUND
  • Rabenstein T, Radaelli F, Zolk O. Warm water infusion colonoscopy: a review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2012 Oct;44(10):940-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310157. Epub 2012 Sep 17.

    PMID: 22987214BACKGROUND
  • Leung FW. Water-aided colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013 Sep;42(3):507-19. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.05.006.

    PMID: 23931857BACKGROUND
  • Wu J, Hu B. The role of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2012 Feb;44(2):128-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291487. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

    PMID: 22271023BACKGROUND
  • Dellon ES, Hawk JS, Grimm IS, Shaheen NJ. The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Apr;69(4):843-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.067. Epub 2009 Jan 18.

    PMID: 19152906BACKGROUND
  • Cadoni S, Falt P, Gallittu P, Liggi M, Mura D, Smajstrla V, Erriu M, Leung FW. Water Exchange Is the Least Painful Colonoscope Insertion Technique and Increases Completion of Unsedated Colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Nov;13(11):1972-80.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.178. Epub 2015 May 5.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainColorectal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsIntestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Sergio Cadoni, MD

    S. Barbara Hospital, Iglesias (CI), Italy

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Responsabile Servizio Endoscopia Digestiva

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2013

First Posted

October 7, 2013

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion

June 1, 2014

Study Completion

July 1, 2014

Last Updated

July 31, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-07

Locations