Comparison of Methods to Distend the Colon During Insertion: CO2, Air Insufflation, Water-aided Colonoscopy
Comparison of Methods for Luminal Distention for on Demand Sedation Colonoscopy: Air Insufflation, Carbon Dioxide and Water-aided Colonoscopy. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
624
3 countries
3
Brief Summary
Insufflation of the colon, usually with room air, is necessary to distend the lumen for exploration. Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation instead of room air insufflation (AI) has been shown to decrease symptoms of abdominal pain or discomfort during the procedure and particularly during the following 24 hours. CO2 is is rapidly absorbed by the intestinal mucosa and exhaled through respiration. AI colonoscopy has usually been the reference standard to compare colonoscopy using CO2 insufflation. In two recent articles AI was compared to either CO2 insufflation and Water-aided colonoscopy (WAC), which entails infusion of water to facilitate insertion to the cecum. WAC can be categorized broadly in Water Immersion (WI) and Water Exchange (WE). In WI water is infused during the insertion phase of colonoscopy, with removal of infused water predominantly during withdrawal. Occasional use of insufflation may be allowed. WE entails complete exclusion of insufflation, removal of residual colonic air pockets and feces, and suction of infused water predominantly during insertion to minimize distention. During the withdrawal phase insufflation is used to distend the colonic lumen. In the WAC arms of the two mentioned articles the insertion method used was WI, with infusion of water at room temperature or at 37°C. During withdrawal, air insufflation or either air or CO2 insufflation were employed. Compared to AI, CO2 insufflation and WI (using room air insufflation or CO2 insufflation during withdrawal) were effective in both studies in decreasing sedation requirement, pain and tolerance scores, with patients' higher willingness to repeat the procedure. Until now no direct comparison has been made within a single study about pain score during colonoscopy using AI, CO2 insufflation, WI/CO2, WE/CO2, WI/AI and WE/AI. In this study we test the hypothesis that, compared to AI, CO2 insufflation and WAC/CO2-AI methods will decrease pain score during colonoscopy, with reduction of sedation requirement, and that WE will achieve the best result. This comparative study has also the aim to test the respective peculiarities of each method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable pain
Started Oct 2013
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 7, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2014
CompletedJuly 31, 2014
July 1, 2014
8 months
September 27, 2013
July 30, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Maximum pain score recorded during colonoscopy.
Pain assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score 0=absence of pain, 2=simply "discomfort", 10=the worst possible pain. Before the procedure, an endoscopic nurse will explain the VAS scoring system to the patients. Every 60 seconds during colonoscopy patients will be asked about discomfort or pain. The responses will be recorded, and the maximum pain score noted.
1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Overall pain after the procedure.
1 hour.
Cecal intubation rate.
1 hour
Cecal intubation time.
1 hour.
Total procedure time.
1 hour.
Adenoma detection rate.
15 months.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (9)
Position changes.
1 hour.
Loop reduction maneuvers.
1 hour.
Amount of water used during the procedure.
1 hour.
- +6 more other outcomes
Study Arms (6)
Air insufflation method.
ACTIVE COMPARATORColonoscopy performed in the standard fashion, with the minimal air insufflation required to aid insertion and allowing for washing as needed. Considered to be standard procedure.
CO2 insufflation
EXPERIMENTALColonoscopy performed with CO2 insufflation using the insufflation unit, allowing for washing as needed.
Water Immersion/CO2
EXPERIMENTALInfusion of water during the insertion phase of colonoscopy mainly to open the colonic lumen and progress to the cecum immersed in the water environment thus created, without attempting to clear the colon contents. Residual air in the colon will not be removed. Infused water and residual feces will be suctioned back predominantly during withdrawal. Insufflation not used until the cecum is reached. It will be allowed only 3 times and no more than 10 seconds each time (ITT failure if \>3) if the lumen cannot be seen. Withdrawal phase done using CO2 insufflation.
Water Exchange/CO2
EXPERIMENTALInsufflation not used until the cecum is reached. Infusion of a sufficient amount of water to render the lumen of the colon a slit to progress with the colonoscope. Part of the infused water will be constantly suctioned back exchanging clean for dirty or hazy water. Air pockets will be always aspirated to collapse the lumen. After cecal intubation as much residual water as possible will be aspirated before beginning the withdrawal phase. During withdrawal residual water and feces will be suctioned. Withdrawal phase done using CO2 insufflation.
Water Immersion/AI
EXPERIMENTALInfusion of water during the insertion phase of colonoscopy mainly to open the colonic lumen and progress to the cecum immersed in the water environment thus created, without attempting to clear the colon contents. Residual air in the colon will not be removed. Infused water and residual feces will be suctioned back predominantly during withdrawal. Insufflation not used until the cecum is reached. It will be allowed only 3 times and no more than 10 seconds each time (ITT failure if \>3) if the lumen cannot be seen. Withdrawal phase done using room air insufflation.
Water Exchange/AI
EXPERIMENTALInsufflation not used until the cecum is reached. Infusion of a sufficient amount of water to render the lumen of the colon a slit to progress with the colonoscope. Part of the infused water will be constantly suctioned back exchanging clean for dirty or hazy water. Air pockets will be always aspirated to collapse the lumen. After cecal intubation as much residual water as possible will be aspirated before beginning the withdrawal phase. During withdrawal residual water and feces will be suctioned. Withdrawal phase done using room air insufflation.
Interventions
Water Immersion during insertion, CO2 insufflation during withdrawal.
Water Exchange during insertion, CO2 insufflation during withdrawal.
Water Immersion during insertion, AI insufflation during withdrawal.
Water Exchange during insertion, AI insufflation during withdrawal.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Consecutive 18 to 85 year-old diagnostic in-patients and outpatients agreeing to start procedure without premedication.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient unwillingness to start the procedure without sedation/analgesia
- previous colorectal surgery
- proctosigmoidoscopy or bidirectional endoscopy
- patient refusal or inability to provide informed consent
- inadequate assumption of bowel preparation
- moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring oxygen
- medical history of CO2 retention
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
Los Angeles, California, 91343, United States
Vìtkovice Hospital
Ostrava, 703 84, Czechia
S. Barbara Hospital
Iglesias, CI, 09016, Italy
Related Publications (8)
Falt P, Liberda M, Smajstrla V, Kliment M, Bartkova A, Tvrdik J, Fojtik P, Urban O. Combination of water immersion and carbon dioxide insufflation for minimal sedation colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, single-center trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Aug;24(8):971-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283543f16.
PMID: 22569079BACKGROUNDAmato A, Radaelli F, Paggi S, Baccarin A, Spinzi G, Terruzzi V. Carbon dioxide insufflation or warm-water infusion versus standard air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):511-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318279addd.
PMID: 23478620BACKGROUNDLeung FW, Amato A, Ell C, Friedland S, Harker JO, Hsieh YH, Leung JW, Mann SK, Paggi S, Pohl J, Radaelli F, Ramirez FC, Siao-Salera R, Terruzzi V. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Sep;76(3):657-66. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.467.
PMID: 22898423BACKGROUNDRabenstein T, Radaelli F, Zolk O. Warm water infusion colonoscopy: a review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2012 Oct;44(10):940-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310157. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
PMID: 22987214BACKGROUNDLeung FW. Water-aided colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013 Sep;42(3):507-19. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.05.006.
PMID: 23931857BACKGROUNDWu J, Hu B. The role of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2012 Feb;44(2):128-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291487. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
PMID: 22271023BACKGROUNDDellon ES, Hawk JS, Grimm IS, Shaheen NJ. The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Apr;69(4):843-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.067. Epub 2009 Jan 18.
PMID: 19152906BACKGROUNDCadoni S, Falt P, Gallittu P, Liggi M, Mura D, Smajstrla V, Erriu M, Leung FW. Water Exchange Is the Least Painful Colonoscope Insertion Technique and Increases Completion of Unsedated Colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Nov;13(11):1972-80.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.178. Epub 2015 May 5.
PMID: 25956838DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sergio Cadoni, MD
S. Barbara Hospital, Iglesias (CI), Italy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Responsabile Servizio Endoscopia Digestiva
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2013
First Posted
October 7, 2013
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
July 1, 2014
Last Updated
July 31, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-07