Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation for Lower Limbs
A Theranostic Tool to Assess and Enable Spared Spinal Motor Function After SCI
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is to determine if non-invasive electrical stimulation of the spinal cord can be used to: 1) assess spared function following a spinal cord injury; and 2) be use for rehabilitation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 19, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 24, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2016
CompletedJanuary 24, 2017
April 1, 2016
1.6 years
September 19, 2013
January 20, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement in sensorimotor function in the lower extremities
Subjects will be tested by several measures of sensory and motor function, as well as self assessments of spasticity, quality of life, and independence. These tests include: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scoring system, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), Ashworth Spasticity Scale, Penn Spasm Frequency, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Spasticity, Electromyographic (EMG) recordings, Joint angle (goniometer) measures, kinematic analysis.
10-12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Ability to stand independently
2-4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Grp#1: sham stimulation
SHAM COMPARATORGroup #1: Baseline clinical assessment; followed by two weeks training with no stimulation; then four weeks training + sham Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation; followed by repeat clinical assessment; then four weeks training + effective non-sham Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation; repeat clinical assessment. Secondary outcome measurements: assess ability to stand with and without stimulation using a stance frame support; assess trunk function (core stability) with and without stimulation
Grp#2: Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup #2: Baseline clinical assessment; followed by two weeks training with no Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation; then four weeks training + effective Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation; followed by repeat clinical assessment. Secondary outcome measurements: assess ability to stand with and without stimulation using a stance frame support; assess trunk function (core stability) with and without stimulation
Interventions
A prototype device that non-invasively delivers electrical stimulation to the spinal cord will be used to assess and rehabilitate spared spinal cord function.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Spinal cord injury 1 or more years prior
- Non progressive cervical or thoracic SCI
- Half of key muscles below neurological level having a motor score of less than 2/5
- Ability to commit to home exercises and 16 week participation
- Stable medical condition without cardiopulmonary disease or dysautonomia that would contraindicate participation in lower extremity rehabilitation or testing activities
- Not dependent on ventilation support
- No painful musculoskeletal dysfunction, unhealed fracture, pressure sore, or urinary tract infection that might interfere with lower extremity rehabilitation or testing activities
- No clinically significant depression or ongoing drug abuse
- Adequate social support network to be able to participate in weekly training and assessment sessions for the duration of the 16 week study period
- No current anti-spasticity regimen
- Must not have received botox injections in the prior six months
- Be unable to use lower extremity for functional tasks
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- No functional segmental reflexes below the lesion
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NeuroEnabling Technologies, Inc.lead
- University of California, Los Angelescollaborator
- California Institute of Technologycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Victor R Edgerton, PhD
University of California, Los Angeles
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicholas A Terrafranca, DPM
NeuroEnabling Technologies, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 19, 2013
First Posted
September 24, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 31, 2016
Study Completion
December 31, 2016
Last Updated
January 24, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-04