NCT01949285

Brief Summary

This study is to determine if non-invasive electrical stimulation of the spinal cord can be used to: 1) assess spared function following a spinal cord injury; and 2) be use for rehabilitation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 19, 2013

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 24, 2013

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2015

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

January 24, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

September 19, 2013

Last Update Submit

January 20, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Spinal cord injuryParalysisRehabilitationAssessmentTheranostics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Improvement in sensorimotor function in the lower extremities

    Subjects will be tested by several measures of sensory and motor function, as well as self assessments of spasticity, quality of life, and independence. These tests include: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scoring system, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), Ashworth Spasticity Scale, Penn Spasm Frequency, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Spasticity, Electromyographic (EMG) recordings, Joint angle (goniometer) measures, kinematic analysis.

    10-12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Ability to stand independently

    2-4 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Grp#1: sham stimulation

SHAM COMPARATOR

Group #1: Baseline clinical assessment; followed by two weeks training with no stimulation; then four weeks training + sham Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation; followed by repeat clinical assessment; then four weeks training + effective non-sham Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation; repeat clinical assessment. Secondary outcome measurements: assess ability to stand with and without stimulation using a stance frame support; assess trunk function (core stability) with and without stimulation

Device: Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation

Grp#2: Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group #2: Baseline clinical assessment; followed by two weeks training with no Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation; then four weeks training + effective Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation; followed by repeat clinical assessment. Secondary outcome measurements: assess ability to stand with and without stimulation using a stance frame support; assess trunk function (core stability) with and without stimulation

Device: Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation

Interventions

A prototype device that non-invasively delivers electrical stimulation to the spinal cord will be used to assess and rehabilitate spared spinal cord function.

Also known as: Prototype Device
Grp#1: sham stimulationGrp#2: Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Spinal cord injury 1 or more years prior
  • Non progressive cervical or thoracic SCI
  • Half of key muscles below neurological level having a motor score of less than 2/5
  • Ability to commit to home exercises and 16 week participation
  • Stable medical condition without cardiopulmonary disease or dysautonomia that would contraindicate participation in lower extremity rehabilitation or testing activities
  • Not dependent on ventilation support
  • No painful musculoskeletal dysfunction, unhealed fracture, pressure sore, or urinary tract infection that might interfere with lower extremity rehabilitation or testing activities
  • No clinically significant depression or ongoing drug abuse
  • Adequate social support network to be able to participate in weekly training and assessment sessions for the duration of the 16 week study period
  • No current anti-spasticity regimen
  • Must not have received botox injections in the prior six months
  • Be unable to use lower extremity for functional tasks

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy
  • No functional segmental reflexes below the lesion

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of California Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord InjuriesParalysis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and InjuriesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Victor R Edgerton, PhD

    University of California, Los Angeles

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Nicholas A Terrafranca, DPM

    NeuroEnabling Technologies, Inc.

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2013

First Posted

September 24, 2013

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion

December 31, 2016

Study Completion

December 31, 2016

Last Updated

January 24, 2017

Record last verified: 2016-04

Locations