Restoring Arm and Hand Function With Non-invasive Spinal Stimulation
1 other identifier
interventional
7
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study is to determine if non-invasive electrical stimulation of the spinal cord can help improve hand and arm function in people with paralysis who suffered a cervical spinal cord injury.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 16, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 24, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2016
CompletedJanuary 24, 2017
April 1, 2016
9 months
July 16, 2013
January 20, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement in sensorimotor function in arms and hands
Subjects will be tested by several measures of sensory and motor function, as well as self-assessments regarding quality of life and independence, at the beginning of the study and at each testing session. These tests include: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scoring system. Box and block CUE (Capabilities of Upper Extremity) GRASSP (Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension) SCIM (Spinal Cord Independence Measure) Ashworth Spasticity scale: Penn Spasm Frequency VAS (Visual Analog Scale) for Spasticity)
12 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Control Grp#1: Training w/ and w/o Stim
OTHERControl- Group #1: 4 weeks training without any transcutaneous electrical stimulation followed by 2 weeks of training plus transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation applied to one or two locations of the cervical (neck) region of the spinal cord.
Grp#2: Training+Single Site Stimulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup #2: Four weeks of training plus transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation applied to one location along the cervical (neck) region of the spinal cord; followed by 2 weeks of training without stimulation
Grp #3: Training + Two Site Stimualtion
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup #3: Four weeks of training plus transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation applied to two locations along the cervical (neck) region of the spinal cord; followed by 2 weeks of training without stimulation
Interventions
A prototype device that delivers transcutaneous electrical stimulation will be used to stimulate the cervical spinal cord.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Spinal cord injury 1 or more years prior
- Non progressive SCI at C7 or higher
- Half of key muscles below neurological level having a motor score of less than 2/5
- Ability to commit to home exercises and 12 week participation
- Stable medical condition without cardiopulmonary disease or dysautonomia that would contraindicate participation in upper extremity rehabilitation or testing activities
- Not dependent on ventilation support
- No painful musculoskeletal dysfunction, unhealed fracture, pressure sore, or urinary tract infection that might interfere with upper extremity rehabilitation or testing activities
- No clinically significant depression or ongoing drug abuse
- Adequate social support network to be able to participate in weekly training and assessment sessions for the duration of the 12 week study period
- No current anti-spasticity regimen
- Must not have received botox injections in the prior six months
- Be unable to use upper extremity for functional tasks
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- No functional segmental reflexes below the lesion
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NeuroEnabling Technologies, Inc.lead
- University of California, Los Angelescollaborator
- California Institute of Technologycollaborator
Study Sites (2)
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
Strides SCI Functional Fitness
San Juan Capistrano, California, 92675, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Victor R Edgerton, PhD
University of California, Los Angeles
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicholas Terrafranca, DPM
NeuroEnabling Technologies, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 16, 2013
First Posted
July 24, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 31, 2016
Study Completion
December 31, 2016
Last Updated
January 24, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-04