Transdiagnostic Psychotherapy for Veterans With Mood and Anxiety Disorders
TBT-RCT
2 other identifiers
interventional
105
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a brief, efficient, and effective psychotherapy for individuals with depressive and anxiety disorders. However, CBT is largely underutilized within Veteran Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) due to the cost and burden of trainings necessary to deliver the large number of CBT protocols. Transdiagnostic CBT, in contrast, is specifically designed to address numerous distinct disorders within a single protocol. This transdiagnostic approach has the potential to dramatically improve the accessibility of CBT within VAMCs and therefore improve clinical outcomes of Veterans. The proposed research seeks to evaluate the efficacy of a transdiagnostic CBT by assessing clinical outcomes and quality of life in VAMC patients with depressive and anxiety disorders throughout the course of treatment and in comparison to an existing evidence-based psychotherapy, behavioral activation treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable major-depressive-disorder
Started Nov 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable major-depressive-disorder
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 17, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 28, 2019
CompletedAugust 28, 2019
July 1, 2019
3.5 years
September 11, 2013
April 12, 2019
July 15, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
DASS-Depression
The DASS-Depression (Lovibond and Lovibond, 1995) is a 7-item measure designed to assess dysphoric mood. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (did not apply to me at all) to 3 (applied to me very much or most of the time), and summed to compute the total scale (range 0-21). Higher scores are indicative of greater symptom severity, with scores greater than 10 typically considered of clinical significance. Support for the factor structure, convergent and discriminant validity, and internal consistency of the DASS has been found in community (Lovibond and Lovibond, 1995).
baseline, immediate post-treatment (after session 12 complete), 6-month follow-up (after session 12 complete)
DASS-Anxiety
The DASS-Anxiety (Lovibond and Lovibond, 1995) is a 7-item measure designed to assess symptoms of fear and autonomic arousal. Items are rated on a 4-point scale, ranging from 0 (did not apply to me at all) to 3 (applied to me very much or most of the time), and summed to compute the total scale (range 0-21). Higher scores are indicative of greater symptom severity, with scores greater than 10 typically considered of clinical significance. Support for the factor structure, convergent and discriminant validity, and internal consistency has been found in community (Lovibond and Lovibond, 1995).
baseline, immediate post-treatment (after session 12 complete), 6-month follow-up (after session 12 complete)
DASS-Stress
The DASS-Stress (Lovibond and Lovibond, 1995) is a 7-item measure designed to assess symptoms of tension and agitation. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (did not apply to me at all) to 3 (applied to me very much or most of the time), and summed to compute the total scale (range 0-21). Higher scores are indicative of greater symptom severity, with scores greater than 10 typically considered of clinical significance. Support for the factor structure, convergent and discriminant validity, and internal consistency has been found in community (Lovibond and Lovibond, 1995).
baseline, immediate post-treatment (after session 12 complete), 6-month follow-up (after session 12 complete)
STICSA-Cognitive
The STICSA-Cognitive (Ree et al., 2008) is a 11-item measure designed to assess trait cognitive anxiety. Items are rated on a 4-point scale, ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so), with a total score range of 11-44. Higher scores are indicative of greater symptom severity, with scores above 23 considered of clinical significance. The cognitive scale have been supported by factor analysis and has been found to have high internal consistency (alphas \> .87; Gros et al., 2007; 2010).
baseline, immediate post-treatment (after session 12 complete), 6-month follow-up (after session 12 complete)
STICSA-Somatic
The STICSA-Somatic (Ree et al., 2008) is a 10-item measure designed to assess trait somatic anxiety. Items are rated on a 4-point scale, ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so), with a total score range of 10-40. Higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity, with scores above 18 considered of clinical significance. The somatic scale have been supported by factor analysis and has been found to have high internal consistency (alphas \> .87; Gros et al., 2007; 2010).
baseline, immediate post-treatment (after session 12 complete), 6-month follow-up (after session 12 complete)
IIRS
The IIRS (Devin et al., 1983) is a 13-item scale that assesses the extent to which a disease interferes with important domains of life. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not very much) to 7 (very much), with a total score range of 13-91. Although norms are not available for all diagnoses given the transdiagnostic nature of the IIRS, higher scores are indicative of greater impairment. The IIRS has strong psychometric properties in the previous literature in participants with physical and/or emotional health concerns (Devins et al., 2001; Devins, 2010).
baseline, immediate post-treatment (after session 12 complete), 6-month follow-up (after session 12 complete)
Study Arms (2)
Transdiagnostic Behavior Therapy
EXPERIMENTALA new transdiagnostic CBT protocol for the depressive/anxiety disorders was developed and revised through two demonstration studies and one focus group. The resulting protocol involves several primary components, including psychoeducation on the symptoms of depression and anxiety (session 1), assessment of motivation and setup of treatment plans (session 2), exposure therapy (sessions 3-15), and relapse prevention (final session). In addition to these primary components, optional modules are included to supplement exposure therapy later in treatment to address secondary symptoms (e.g., anger, sleep, hypervigilance, drinking to cope). The goal of these modules is to allow providers to tailor treatment to specific symptoms that may be present in any single or set of diagnoses that may be reducing the effects from the primary exposure approach. Session will be weekly for 45-60 minutes with homework assignments to be completed between sessions.
Behavioral Activation Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORTo provide an evidence-based comparison for the transdiagnostic CBT condition, a second group of participants will receive manualized BAT. In general, BAT involves teaching patients to monitor their mood and daily activities with the goal of increasing pleasant, reinforcing activities and reducing unpleasant events. In the present study, the BAT condition will be manualized, following an existing protocol in the literature. BAT will be structurally equivalent to the transdiagnostic CBT with the same session length (45-60 minutes), frequency of sessions (weekly), duration of treatment (12-16 sessions), and amount of homework.
Interventions
A new transdiagnostic CBT protocol for the depressive/anxiety disorders was developed and revised through two demonstration studies and one focus group. The resulting protocol involves several primary components, including psychoeducation on the symptoms of depression and anxiety (session 1), assessment of motivation and setup of treatment plans (session 2), exposure therapy (sessions 3-15), and relapse prevention (final session). In addition to these primary components, optional modules are included to supplement exposure therapy later in treatment to address secondary symptoms (e.g., anger, sleep, hypervigilance, drinking to cope). The goal of these modules is to allow providers to tailor treatment to specific symptoms that may be present in any single or set of diagnoses that may be reducing the effects from the primary exposure approach. Session will be weekly for 45-60 minutes with homework assignments to be completed between sessions.
To provide an evidence-based comparison for the transdiagnostic CBT condition, a second group of participants will receive manualized BAT. In general, BAT involves teaching patients to monitor their mood and daily activities with the goal of increasing pleasant, reinforcing activities and reducing unpleasant events. In the present study, the BAT condition will be manualized, following an existing protocol in the literature. BAT will be structurally equivalent to the transdiagnostic CBT with the same session length (45-60 minutes), frequency of sessions (weekly), duration of treatment (12-16 sessions), and amount of homework.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- participants must be clearly competent to provide informed consent for research participation;
- participants must meet DSM diagnostic criteria for a principal diagnosis of a depressive/anxiety disorder (Panic Disorder, PTSD, Social Anxiety Disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), specific phobia, major depressive disorder, or persistent depressive disorder); and
- participants must be 18 - 80 years old.
You may not qualify if:
- recent history (\< 2 months) of psychiatric hospitalization or a suicide attempt as documented in their medical record,
- current diagnosis of substance dependence or abuse on the structured clinical interview,
- acute, severe illness or medical condition that likely will require hospitalization and/or otherwise interfere with study procedures as documented in their medical record (e.g., active chemotherapy/radiation treatment for cancer, kidney dialysis, oxygen therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease),
- recent start of new psychiatric medication (\< 4 weeks),
- diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in their medical record and/or endorsement of screener questionnaire regarding the symptoms of TBI modified from the Post-Deployment Health Assessment employed by the Department of Defense, or
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
Charleston, South Carolina, 29401-5799, United States
Related Publications (3)
Coyne AE, Gros DF. Comorbidity as a moderator of the differential efficacy of transdiagnostic behavior therapy and behavioral activation for affective disorders. Psychother Res. 2022 Sep;32(7):886-897. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2021.2022236. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
PMID: 34996343DERIVEDShapiro MO, Gros DF. Acceptability of a transdiagnostic behavior therapy in veterans with affective disorders. Psychol Serv. 2021 Nov;18(4):643-650. doi: 10.1037/ser0000490. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
PMID: 32673037DERIVEDGros DF, Oglesby ME, Wray JM. An Open Trial of Behavioral Activation in Veterans With Major Depressive Disorder or Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Primary Care. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2019 Oct 3;21(5):19m02468. doi: 10.4088/PCC.19m02468.
PMID: 31600432DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
higher than expected dropout rates
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Daniel Gros, PHD
- Organization
- Ralph H. Johnson VAMC
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel F Gros, PhD MA BS
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2013
First Posted
September 20, 2013
Study Start
November 17, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2018
Last Updated
August 28, 2019
Results First Posted
August 28, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07