Communicating Evidence From Systematic Reviews to the Public
PLSRCT
1 other identifier
interventional
193
5 countries
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of this randomised controlled trial is to compare a new standardised summary format for presentation of synthesised evidence from systematic reviews for the public (a new plain language summary format) to the current format used in Cochrane systematic reviews. The study will evaluate if the new presentation improves understanding about the benefits and harms of an intervention, if it improves the accessibility of the information, and if it is preferred over other versions by the public over the current format.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2009
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 11, 2013
CompletedSeptember 11, 2013
September 1, 2013
5 months
August 27, 2013
September 6, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Understanding of benefits and harms
Average proportion of people who answered 5 multiple choice questions correctly. Each question includes five response options about the number of people who could benefit or be harmed by the intervention and about the quality of evidence
After reading summary - time 0
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of questions answered correctly
After reading summary - time 0
Other Outcomes (4)
Understanding of the purpose of the summary
after reading summary - time 0
Understanding the producer of the summary
after reading summary - time 0
Usability and accessibility
after reading summary - time 0
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
New plain language summary format
EXPERIMENTALNew plain language summary format of a Cochrane systematic review
Current plain language summary format
ACTIVE COMPARATORPlain Language Summary format for the public currently in use in Cochrane systematic reviews
Interventions
New plain language summary includes qualitative and quantitative description of text (absolute effects and natural frequencies provided); quantitative results provided in a table; quality of the evidence according to GRADE provided in a table; question and answer format; follows principles of linguistic frameworks (e.g. progressive movements from introduction to 'bottom line')
Current plain language summary includes qualitative description of effects only; inconsistent description of the quality of the evidence; paragraph of text; inconsistent flow of information
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients or members of the public 16 years or older
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Serviceslead
- McMaster Universitycollaborator
- University of Ottawacollaborator
- Asociacion Colaboracion Cochrane Iberoamericanacollaborator
- University of Milancollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Argentine Cochrane Centre, Instituto de Efectividad ClĂnica y Sanitaria (IECS)
Buenos Aires, Argentina
University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
University of Milan
Milan, Italy
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services
Oslo, Norway
Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano - Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Claire Glenton, PhD
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Holger J Schunemann, MD PhD
McMaster University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nancy A Santesso, RD PhD cand
McMaster University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2013
First Posted
September 11, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2009
Primary Completion
October 1, 2009
Study Completion
October 1, 2009
Last Updated
September 11, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-09