Comparing Ketamine and Propofol Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy
A Prospective Randomized Double Blinded Control Trial Using Ketamine or Propofol Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy: Improving Treatment-Resistant Depression
1 other identifier
interventional
27
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To determine the effect of ketamine, compared to propofol, when used an an anesthetic agent for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). We hypothesize that ketamine, compared to propofol, will improve the the symptoms of MDD when used as the anesthetic agent to facilitate ECT. Additionally, we hypothesize the dissociative and cardiovascular effects of ketamine will be minimal.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Sep 2013
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 4, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedSeptember 13, 2017
September 1, 2017
2.5 years
August 26, 2013
September 12, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome is defined as the number of ECT treatments required to reach a 50% reduction in baseline MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale) score.
Standard of care for ECT in the Saskatoon Health Region are biweekly sessions for a total of 8 treatments. Occasionally, a patient meets early remission and may not require the full 8 treatments and may be eligible for early withdrawal.
After 8 treatments or completion of therapy for an expected average of 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change in CADSS (Clinician Administered Dissociative States Scale)
30 minutes after each ECT session and one day after each ECT session for an expected average of 4 weeks
Change in ALS-18 (Affective Lability Scale)
30 days after final ECT session for an expected average duration of 2 months
Change in ECT energy settings and seizure quality
Within 30 minutes of each treatment for an expected average of 4 weeks
Hemodynamic instability and respiratory complications
1 hour after each ECT for an expected average of 4 weeks
Time to discharge
1 hour after each treatment for an expected average of 4 weeks
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Propofol
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group will receive propofol 1 mg/kg and remifentanil 1 mcg/kg intravenously
Ketamine
EXPERIMENTALStudy group will receive ketamine 0.75 mg/kg and remifentanil 1 mcg/kg intravenously
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Fulfill the diagnostic criteria for major depression according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (most recent edition)
- Failure to respond to at least 2 adequate drug therapies for the current depression episode
- MADRS score of 20 or above (moderate - severe
- ASA physical status classification I to III
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to obtain informed consent
- ASA physical status classification IV
- Complication by any serious physical diseases such as cardiovascular disease (including untreated HTN), respiratory disease, cerebrovascular disease, intracranial HTN (including glaucoma), or seizures
- Presence of foreign body (including pacemaker)
- Pregnancy
- Allergies to anesthetics used in study Includes: a) Ketamine b) Propofol c) Eggs d) Egg products e) Soybeans f) Soy products
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Saskatchewanlead
- Saskatoon Health Regioncollaborator
- Royal University Hospital Foundationcollaborator
- Schulman Research Awardcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Royal University Hospital
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8, Canada
Related Publications (7)
Zarate CA Jr, Singh JB, Carlson PJ, Brutsche NE, Ameli R, Luckenbaugh DA, Charney DS, Manji HK. A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;63(8):856-64. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.856.
PMID: 16894061BACKGROUNDBerman RM, Cappiello A, Anand A, Oren DA, Heninger GR, Charney DS, Krystal JH. Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2000 Feb 15;47(4):351-4. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00230-9.
PMID: 10686270BACKGROUNDZarate CA Jr, Brutsche NE, Ibrahim L, Franco-Chaves J, Diazgranados N, Cravchik A, Selter J, Marquardt CA, Liberty V, Luckenbaugh DA. Replication of ketamine's antidepressant efficacy in bipolar depression: a randomized controlled add-on trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Jun 1;71(11):939-46. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
PMID: 22297150BACKGROUNDDiazgranados N, Ibrahim L, Brutsche NE, Newberg A, Kronstein P, Khalife S, Kammerer WA, Quezado Z, Luckenbaugh DA, Salvadore G, Machado-Vieira R, Manji HK, Zarate CA Jr. A randomized add-on trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;67(8):793-802. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.90.
PMID: 20679587BACKGROUNDOkamoto N, Nakai T, Sakamoto K, Nagafusa Y, Higuchi T, Nishikawa T. Rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy of treatment-resistant depression: comparing ketamine and propofol anesthesia. J ECT. 2010 Sep;26(3):223-7. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3181c3b0aa.
PMID: 19935085BACKGROUNDWang X, Chen Y, Zhou X, Liu F, Zhang T, Zhang C. Effects of propofol and ketamine as combined anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy in patients with depressive disorder. J ECT. 2012 Jun;28(2):128-32. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31824d1d02.
PMID: 22622291BACKGROUNDGamble JJ, Bi H, Bowen R, Weisgerber G, Sanjanwala R, Prasad R, Balbuena L. Ketamine-based anesthesia improves electroconvulsive therapy outcomes: a randomized-controlled study. Can J Anaesth. 2018 Jun;65(6):636-646. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1088-0. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
PMID: 29700801DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jonathan Gamble, MD
University of Saskatchewan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2013
First Posted
September 4, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share