Laser Versus Ultrasonic Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Staghorn Stones
2 other identifiers
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will be conducted to compare the results of Laser and ultrasonic lithotripsy in disintegration of staghorn stones during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2011
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2014
CompletedAugust 11, 2015
August 1, 2015
3.1 years
August 1, 2013
August 10, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Stone Free rate
Assessment of stone free rate after 3 months from treatment using NCCT
Patients will be followed for 3 months after the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Assessment of the safety of each technique
From the start of the operation till 3 months after discharge from the hospital
Operative time
An expected average of 3 hours
Hospital stay
up to 7 days
Study Arms (2)
Laser
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will undergo Laser lithotripsy
Ultrasonic
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will undergo ultrasonic lithotripsy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Complete staghorn stones (filling the renal pelvis and branching to 3 major calyces
- Age: 18-70 years
You may not qualify if:
- Congenital renal anomalies such as horse shoe kidney.
- Contraindications to PNL such as bleeding tendency and uncontrolled hypertension.
- Associated pathological features requiring open intervention such as UPJO
- Partial staghorn stones (filling the renal pelvis and branching to 2 major calyces)
- Giant staghorn stone (very large staghorn stone that branch and re-branch in hugely dilated calyceal system)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Urology and Nephrology Center
Al Mansurah, Dakhlia, 35516, Egypt
Related Publications (12)
Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS Jr; AUA Nephrolithiasis Guideline Panel). Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol. 2005 Jun;173(6):1991-2000. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000161171.67806.2a. No abstract available.
PMID: 15879803BACKGROUNDBagley DH. Expanding role of ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for treatment of proximal ureteral and intrarenal calculi. Curr Opin Urol. 2002 Jul;12(4):277-80. doi: 10.1097/00042307-200207000-00003.
PMID: 12072646BACKGROUNDJou YC, Shen JH, Cheng MC, Lin CT, Chen PC. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with holmium: Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and fiber guider--report of 349 cases. Urology. 2005 Mar;65(3):454-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.069.
PMID: 15780354BACKGROUNDGu Z, Qi J, Shen H, Liu J, Chen J. Percutaneous nephroscopic with holmium laser and ultrasound lithotripsy for complicated renal calculi. Lasers Med Sci. 2010 Jul;25(4):577-80. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0769-x. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
PMID: 20232221BACKGROUNDMandal S, Goel A, Goyal NK. Re: Staghorn morphometry: a new tool for clinical classification and prediction model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy. (From: Mishra S, Sabnis RB, Desai M. J Endourol 2012;26:6-14). J Endourol. 2012 Aug;26(8):1099. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0088. Epub 2012 Apr 17. No abstract available.
PMID: 22509933BACKGROUNDQi S, Li L, Liu R, Qiao B, Zhang Z, Xu Y. Impact of stone branch number on outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn calculi. J Endourol. 2014 Feb;28(2):152-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0333. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
PMID: 24083829BACKGROUNDel-Nahas AR, Eraky I, Shokeir AA, Shoma AM, el-Assmy AM, el-Tabey NA, Soliman S, Elshal AM, el-Kappany HA, el-Kenawy MR. Factors affecting stone-free rate and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stone. Urology. 2012 Jun;79(6):1236-41. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.026. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
PMID: 22465085BACKGROUNDDesai M, De Lisa A, Turna B, Rioja J, Walfridsson H, D'Addessi A, Wong C, Rosette On Behalf Of The Croes Pcnl Study Group J. The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones. J Endourol. 2011 Aug;25(8):1263-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0055. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
PMID: 21774666BACKGROUNDJou YC, Shen CH, Cheng MC, Lin CT, Chen PC. High-power holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for percutaneous treatment of large renal stones. Urology. 2007 Jan;69(1):22-5; discussion 25-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1114.
PMID: 17270603RESULTSun Y, Gao X, Zhou T, Chen S, Wang L, Xu C, Hou J. 70 W holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi. J Endourol. 2009 Oct;23(10):1687-91. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.1536.
PMID: 19732015RESULTMalik HA, Tipu SA, Mohayuddin N, Sultan G, Hussain M, Hashmi A, Naqvi SA, Rizvi SA. Comparison of holmium: Yag laser and pneumatic lithoclast in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Pak Med Assoc. 2007 Aug;57(8):385-7.
PMID: 17902519RESULTEl-Nahas AR, Eraky I, Shokeir AA, Shoma AM, El-Assmy AM, El-Tabey NA, El-Kappany HA, El-Kenawy MR. Long-term results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stones. BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(5):750-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09942.x. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
PMID: 21166763RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ahmed R. EL-Nahas, MD
faculty of medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Urology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2013
First Posted
August 14, 2013
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
September 1, 2014
Study Completion
September 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 11, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08