Study Stopped
Change in priorities occurred
Use of Antiretropulsion Device in Laser Lithotripsy
Use of the Accordion Stone Management Device in Laser Lithotripsy
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The objectives of this post-market evaluation are
- 1.to assess the capacity of the procedure to be completed with use of only a semi-rigid ureteroscope, without requiring use of a flexible ureteroscope
- 2.to compare the rate of retropulsion and the time required to complete the lithotripsy in patients in which the Accordion device is used in contrast to when such a device is not employed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2009
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedJanuary 8, 2010
January 1, 2010
4 months
March 5, 2009
January 6, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of retropulsion or migration of the stone or fragments
Two months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Elapsed times for placing the safety guidewire
Two months
Fragmenting the stone into pieces no larger than 1 mm in size
Two months
Removing the fragments from the ureter
Two months
Procedure time
Two months
Study Arms (2)
Accordion use
EXPERIMENTALUse of an Accordion device during the lithotripsy.
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients who will not have an Accordion device used during lithotripsy.
Interventions
an antiretropulsion device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Solitary ureteral stone in the distal or medial ureter, 10 mm in diameter or less, as demonstrated by preoperative CT or IVP imaging and are 18 years of age or older.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients will be excluded from this study if they have active urinary tract infection, or, if female, pregnant, or has clinical evidence of sepsis, or a single or nonfunctioning kidney, or coagulopathy, or congenital ureteral abnormality, or previous ureteral reimplantation, or presence of any degree of ureteral stricture distal to the stone, as determined before or during the procedure, or inability to sign informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Kaiser Permanente Bellflower Hospital
Downey, California, 90706, United States
New York University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10016, United States
USMD Hospital
Arlington, Texas, 76017, United States
Related Publications (4)
Manohar T, Ganpule A, Desai M. Comparative evaluation of Swiss LithoClast 2 and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted upper-ureteral stones. J Endourol. 2008 Mar;22(3):443-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0288.
PMID: 18355139RESULTBapat SS, Pai KV, Purnapatre SS, Yadav PB, Padye AS. Comparison of holmium laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in managing upper-ureteral stones. J Endourol. 2007 Dec;21(12):1425-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0350.
PMID: 18186678RESULTIlker Y, Ozgur A, Yazici C. Treatment of ureteral stones using Holmium:YAG laser. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37(1):31-4. doi: 10.1007/s11255-004-6084-3.
PMID: 16132755RESULTMaislos SD, Volpe M, Albert PS, Raboy A. Efficacy of the Stone Cone for treatment of proximal ureteral stones. J Endourol. 2004 Nov;18(9):862-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.862.
PMID: 15659920RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Thomas T Lawson, PhD
Percutaneous Systems, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2009
First Posted
March 10, 2009
Study Start
February 1, 2009
Primary Completion
June 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
January 8, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-01