Study Stopped
Study has halted prematurely as we were not able to meet our target accrual.
Clinical Evaluation of BackStop in Patients Undergoing Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
Post FDA-Approval Clinical Evaluation of BackStopTM in Patients Undergoing Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
35
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate BackStop, a polymer-based device that is intended to be used during ureteroscopic lithotripsy to prevent retrograde stone migration.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 18, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 22, 2019
CompletedMay 22, 2019
April 1, 2019
2.2 years
April 18, 2014
April 2, 2019
April 29, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of Prevention of Retrograde Stone or Stone Fragment Migration
Prevention of retrograde stone migration (Yes/No)
At the time of surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Stone-free Rate
2 months
Other Outcomes (3)
Need for Secondary Procedures
Up to 3 months
Time for BackStop Injection
Minutes during Surgery
Duration of Lithotripsy Procedure
during surgery
Study Arms (2)
BackStop
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to the Experimental arm will receive the BackStop gel during their ureteroscopic lithotripsy to prevent retrograde migration of stones or stone fragments.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONPatients randomized to the control group will not use any devices to prevent retrograde migration of stones and stone fragments during their ureteroscopic lithotripsy.
Interventions
BackStopâ„¢ is a FDA approved device. It is intended for use during ureteroscopic lithotripsy to prevent retrograde migration of stones and stone fragments. It is comprised of a solution of a thermosensitive polymer, a purified version of poloxamer 407 having been fractionated in saline. BackStopâ„¢, which is injected above the stone, is provided in sterile, pre-filled 2.5ml and 5ml syringes along with and a corresponding injector and a catheter (3F or 5F).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patient with solitary ureteral stone ranging from 5mm to 15mm diameter
- able to tolerate general anesthesia
- clinical indication for treatment by ureteroscopic lithotripsy
- must be willing and able to participate in any follow-up visits
- provide informed consent
- have a CT scan demonstrating the stone
You may not qualify if:
- patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or any other extracorporeal or percutaneous lithotripsy procedure as primary procedure
- renal or ureteral anatomical abnormality
- multiple stones in the indicated ureter
- stones in the indicated kidney
- patient is immunocompromised
- multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
- has an absolute or relative solitary kidney mass
- \>= Stage 3 chronic kidney disease
- bilateral ureteral obstructing stones
- staghorn calculi
- impaction of several stone fragments (Steinstrasse)
- uncorrected coagulopathy/thrombocytopenia
- urethral and/or ureteral stricture
- reconstructive urinary surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Southern Californialead
- Urology of Virginiacollaborator
Study Sites (2)
USC Institute of Urology
Los Angeles, California, 90089, United States
Urology of Virginia
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23462, United States
Related Publications (8)
Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Dretler SP, Kahn RI, Lingeman JE, Macaluso JN Jr. Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association. J Urol. 1997 Nov;158(5):1915-21. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64173-9.
PMID: 9334635BACKGROUNDInternational Conference on Harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use.. ICH harmonized tripartite guideline: Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. J Postgrad Med. 2001 Jan-Mar;47(1):45-50. No abstract available.
PMID: 11590294BACKGROUNDHendrikx AJ, Strijbos WE, de Knijff DW, Kums JJ, Doesburg WH, Lemmens WA. Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study. J Endourol. 1999 Dec;13(10):727-33. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.727.
PMID: 10646679BACKGROUNDPardalidis NP, Kosmaoglou EV, Kapotis CG. Endoscopy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of distal ureteral stones: ten years' experience. J Endourol. 1999 Apr;13(3):161-4. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.161.
PMID: 10360494BACKGROUNDChow GK, Patterson DE, Blute ML, Segura JW. Ureteroscopy: effect of technology and technique on clinical practice. J Urol. 2003 Jul;170(1):99-102. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000070883.44091.24.
PMID: 12796655BACKGROUNDKnispel HH, Klan R, Heicappell R, Miller K. Pneumatic lithotripsy applied through deflected working channel of miniureteroscope: results in 143 patients. J Endourol. 1998 Dec;12(6):513-5. doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.513.
PMID: 9895254BACKGROUNDRobert M, Bennani A, Guiter J, Averous M, Grasset D. Treatment of 150 ureteric calculi with the Lithoclast. Eur Urol. 1994;26(3):212-5. doi: 10.1159/000475382.
PMID: 7805707BACKGROUNDRane A, Bradoo A, Rao P, Shivde S, Elhilali M, Anidjar M, Pace K, D'A Honey JR. The use of a novel reverse thermosensitive polymer to prevent ureteral stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1417-21. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.023. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
PMID: 20171695BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study was not able to meet target accrual and was closed early. More patients are needed to fully evaluate the clinical effectiveness of BackStop.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Matthew Dunn
- Organization
- USC Intitute of Urology
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew Dunn, M.D.
USC Institute of Urology
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 18, 2014
First Posted
April 24, 2014
Study Start
April 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 22, 2019
Results First Posted
May 22, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share