NCT01920555

Brief Summary

This study is looking at the efficacy, durability, safety, and tolerability of multiple single doses of Ketamine vs. active placebo for treating patients with treatment resistant depression who are taking an antidepressant that is not working for them.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
99

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

6 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 8, 2013

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 12, 2013

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2014

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2017

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 17, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

June 19, 2018

Status Verified

May 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

August 8, 2013

Results QC Date

December 28, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 24, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

DepressionTreatment Resistant DepressionKetamineAntidepressantMDDMajor Depression

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression - 6 Items

    The HAMD6 is a 6-item clinician-rated scale, where clinicians rate the presence of depression symptoms (i.e., depressed mood, guilt, work and interests, psychomotor retardation, psychic anxiety, somatic symptoms) on a 5-point scale, where 0 = not present, and 1-4 represent increasingly severe symptoms. One item (i.e., somatic symptoms) is rated on only a 3-point scale, ranging from 0-2. The possible scale range is 0-22, where higher values represent more severe depression. This instrument is completed with a structured interview guide by the clinician based on his/her assessment of the patient's symptoms. This structured interview has been validated for use with time frames shorter than one week. In this study, the HAMD6 was used to assess symptoms occurring in the past 24 hours.

    A baseline assessment was made on Day 0, preceding infusion (i.e., treatment). Outcome assessments were made on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 30. The primary endpoint for this study was Day 3. Thus, the outcome measure table provides data on Days 0, 1, & 3

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    A baseline assessment was made on Day 0, preceding infusion (i.e., treatment). Outcome assessments were made on days 3, 5, 7, 14, and 30. The primary endpoint for this study was Day 3. Thus, the outcome measure table provides data on Days 0 and 3.

  • Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S)

    A baseline assessment was made on Day 0, preceding infusion (i.e., treatment). Outcome assessments were made on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 30. The primary endpoint for this study was Day 3. Thus, the outcome measure table provides data on Days 0, 1 and 3

  • Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale

    A baseline assessment was made on Day 0, preceding infusion (i.e., treatment). Outcome assessments were made on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 30. The primary endpoint for this study was Day 3. Thus, the outcome measure table provides data on Days 0, 1 and 3

  • Symptoms of Depression Questionnaire (SDQ)

    A baseline assessment was made on Day 0, preceding infusion (i.e., treatment). Outcome assessments were made on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 30. The primary endpoint for this study was Day 3. Thus, the outcome measure table provides data on Days 0, 1 and 3

  • Clinical Positive Affect Scale (CPAS)

    A baseline assessment was made on Day 0, preceding infusion (i.e., treatment). Outcome assessments were made on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 30. The primary endpoint for this study was Day 3. Thus, the outcome measure table provides data on Days 0, 1 and 3

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (5)

Ketamine 0.1mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in this arm will receive 0.1 mg/kg of Ketamine - one single infusion

Drug: Ketamine

Ketamine 0.2mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in this arm will receive 0.2 mg/kg of Ketamine - one single infusion

Drug: Ketamine

Ketamine 0.5mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in this arm will receive 0.5 mg/kg of Ketamine - one single infusion

Drug: Ketamine

Ketamine 1.0mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in this arm will receive 1.0 mg/kg of Ketamine - one single infusion

Drug: Ketamine

Midazolam (Active Placebo)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Patients in this arm will receive 0.045 mg/kg of midazolam - one single infusion

Drug: Placebo Midazolam

Interventions

Dose of Ketamine will be 0.1 mg/kg - one single infusion

Ketamine 0.1mg

Dose of Midazolam (active placebo) will be 0.045 mg/kg - one single infusion

Midazolam (Active Placebo)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female, 18-70 years old.
  • Able to read, understand, and provide written, dated informed consent prior to screening.
  • Diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), single or recurrent, and currently experiencing a Major Depressive Episode (MDE) of at least eight weeks in duration, prior to screening.
  • Has a history of TRD during the current MDE.
  • Meet the threshold on the total MADRS score of greater than or equal to 20 at both screening and baseline visits (Day -7/-28 and Day 0), as confirmed by the remote centralized MGH CTNI rater between the screen visit and the baseline visit.
  • In good general health
  • For female participants, status of non-childbearing potential or use of an acceptable form of birth control
  • Body mass index between 18-35 kg/m2
  • Concurrent psychotherapy will be allowed if the type and frequency of the therapy has been stable for at least three months prior to screening and is expected to remain stable during participation in the study
  • Concurrent hypnotic therapy will be allowed if the therapy has been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to screening and if it is expected to remain stable during the course of the subject's participation in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Female of childbearing potential who is not willing to use one of the specified forms of birth control during the study
  • Female that is pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Female with a positive pregnancy test at screening or baseline
  • History during the current MDE of failure to achieve a satisfactory response to \>7 treatment courses of a therapeutic dose of an antidepressant therapy of at least 8 weeks duration during the current episode
  • Total MADRS score of \<20 at the screen or baseline visits, or as assessed by the remote, independent MGH CTNI rater and reported to the site
  • Current diagnosis of a Substance Use Disorder (Abuse or Dependence) with the exception of nicotine dependence, at screening or within 6 months prior to screening
  • Current Axis I disorder that is the principal focus of treatment and MDD the secondary focus of treatment for the past 6 months or more
  • History of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders, or any history of psychotic symptoms in the current or previous depressive episodes
  • History of eating disorders within five years of screening
  • Any Axis I or Axis II Disorder, which at screening is clinically predominant to their MDD or has been predominant at any time within 6 months prior to screening
  • Subject is considered at significant risk for suicidal behavior during the course of their participation in the study
  • Has failed to respond to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) during the current depressive episode
  • Has received vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) at any time prior to screening
  • Has dementia, delirium, amnestic, or any other cognitive disorder
  • Has a clinically significant abnormality on the screening physical examination
  • +26 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Stanford University

Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States

Location

Yale University

New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, United States

Location

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

Mount Sinai School of Medicine

New York, New York, 10029, United States

Location

University of Texas Southwestern

Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States

Location

Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • HAMILTON M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14399272BACKGROUND
  • Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1967 Dec;6(4):278-96. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1967.tb00530.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 6080235BACKGROUND
  • Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382.

    PMID: 444788BACKGROUND
  • Guy W, editor. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: US Department of Heath, Education, and Welfare Public Health Service Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration; 1976.

    BACKGROUND
  • Nierenberg AA, Bentley KH, Farabaugh AH, Fava M, Deckersbach T. The absence of depressive symptoms is not the presence of wellness: validation of the Clinical Positive Affect Scale. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;46(12):1165-72. doi: 10.1177/0004867412459810. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

    PMID: 22990434BACKGROUND
  • Posner K, Oquendo MA, Gould M, Stanley B, Davies M. Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA): classification of suicidal events in the FDA's pediatric suicidal risk analysis of antidepressants. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;164(7):1035-43. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.7.1035.

    PMID: 17606655BACKGROUND
  • Snaith RP, Hamilton M, Morley S, Humayan A, Hargreaves D, Trigwell P. A scale for the assessment of hedonic tone the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1995 Jul;167(1):99-103. doi: 10.1192/bjp.167.1.99.

    PMID: 7551619BACKGROUND
  • Bremner JD, Krystal JH, Putnam FW, Southwick SM, Marmar C, Charney DS, Mazure CM. Measurement of dissociative states with the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS). J Trauma Stress. 1998 Jan;11(1):125-36. doi: 10.1023/A:1024465317902.

    PMID: 9479681BACKGROUND
  • Feeney A, Hoeppner BB, Freeman MP, Flynn M, Iosifescu DV, Trivedi MH, Sanacora G, Mathew SJ, DeBattista C, Ionescu DF, Cusin C, Papakostas GI, Jha MK, Fava M. Effect of Concomitant Benzodiazepines on the Antidepressant Effects of Ketamine: Findings From the RAPID Intravenous Ketamine Study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 14;84(1):22m14491. doi: 10.4088/JCP.22m14491.

  • Feeney A, Hock RS, Freeman MP, Flynn M, Hoeppner B, Iosifescu DV, Trivedi MH, Sanacora G, Mathew SJ, Debattista C, Ionescu DF, Fava M, Papakostas GI. The effect of single administration of intravenous ketamine augmentation on suicidal ideation in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: Results from a randomized double-blind study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 Aug;49:122-132. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.04.024. Epub 2021 Jun 3.

  • Freeman MP, Hock RS, Papakostas GI, Judge H, Cusin C, Mathew SJ, Sanacora G, Iosifescu DV, DeBattista C, Trivedi MH, Fava M. Body Mass Index as a Moderator of Treatment Response to Ketamine for Major Depressive Disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 May/Jun;40(3):287-292. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001209.

  • Fava M, Freeman MP, Flynn M, Judge H, Hoeppner BB, Cusin C, Ionescu DF, Mathew SJ, Chang LC, Iosifescu DV, Murrough J, Debattista C, Schatzberg AF, Trivedi MH, Jha MK, Sanacora G, Wilkinson ST, Papakostas GI. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial of intravenous ketamine as adjunctive therapy in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;25(7):1592-1603. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0256-5. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantDepressionDepressive Disorder, Major

Interventions

Ketamine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Depressive DisorderMood DisordersMental DisordersBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CyclohexanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Results Point of Contact

Title
Maurizio Fava, MD
Organization
Massachusetts General Hospital

Study Officials

  • Maurizio Fava, MD

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Overall Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2013

First Posted

August 12, 2013

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion

January 1, 2017

Study Completion

February 1, 2017

Last Updated

June 19, 2018

Results First Posted

April 17, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-05

Locations