NCT01917539

Brief Summary

Our primary aim is to determine whether pulsed light therapy (PLT) is effective in reducing symptoms and improving clinical stigmata of dry eye syndrome (DES) associated with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in patients with facial rosacea (which includes ocular rosacea). The uses of PLT are for treatment of rosacea, hair removal, pigmented lesions, and skin telangiectasias. The risks include the potential for transient sunburn-like sensations (i.e. redness, burning sensation) and particularly if not used properly, the potential to cause burns, blistering, scarring, and pigmentary changes.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 19, 2013

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 6, 2013

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

June 28, 2018

Status Verified

June 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

July 19, 2013

Last Update Submit

June 27, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Anatomical improvement of the meibomian glands and their secretions.

    We are looking at subjective changes in DES symptomatology based on the OSDI questionnaire score. We are also looking at objective changes in examination findings based on the tear film properties (TBUT, Schirmer), staining patterns of the ocular surface using fluor. and LG dyes, characteristics of the meibomian glands and lid margin (e.g. telangiectasias, notching, myelography by transillumination, etc), as well as the meibum secretions (e.g. expressibility, and consistency). Change in baseline for OSDI, TBUT in seconds, Schirmer testing in mm, staining pattern score (standardized proprietary score on a scale of 1-4), myelography by % of meibomian glands that can be transilluminated, expressibility/consistency (proprietary score on scale of 1-4) will be measured.

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

Sham Treatment

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham light treatment will consist of applying the usual eye shields used for PLT, applying the usual skin gel to the facial region, and applying the cooling probe without application of pulsed light therapy treatment. All subjects will come for their initial visit where evaluation and treatment #1 will take place. They will also attend 3 follow-up visits spaced approximately 3-4 weeks apart during which they will have subsequent treatments and/or evaluations for their dry eyes. The visit duration will range from approximately 60-90 minutes per clinic visit.

Device: Sham Treatment

Pulsed Light Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

All subjects will come for their initial visit where evaluation and treatment #1 will take place. They will also attend 3 follow-up visits spaced approximately 3-4 weeks apart during which they will have subsequent treatments and/or evaluations for their dry eyes. The visit duration will range from approximately 60-90 minutes per clinic visit.

Device: Pulsed Light Therapy

Interventions

Sham light treatment will consist of applying the usual eye shields used for PLT, applying the usual skin gel to the facial region, and applying the cooling probe without application of pulsed light therapy treatment.

Sham Treatment

Light treatment will consist of applying eye shields used for PLT, applying the skin gel to the facial region, and applying the probe with application of pulsed light therapy treatment.

Pulsed Light Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age greater or equal to 18 y/o
  • Patients presenting to academic referral center for DES
  • Diagnosis of mild to moderate DES with meibomian gland dysfunction and ocular rosacea, based on evaluation of meibomian glands (MG), MG secretions, and other factors
  • Facial rosacea
  • Patients must not have started any new medications within the past 1 month
  • Patients should not be using warm compresses or lid scrubs more than 1-2 times in the previous 2 weeks
  • Symptomatic changes in DES

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \< 18
  • History of inflammatory DES (e.g. Sjogren's, rheumatoid arthritis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, ocular cicatricial pemphigoid)
  • History of trauma-induced ocular surface disease (thermal burns, chemical burns)
  • Severe DES
  • Pregnant women
  • H/o seizures
  • Significant unprotected sun exposure or use of tanning beds or creams in treated area (must be discontinued at least 2 weeks prior to treatment, during treatment course, and 2 weeks after last treatment)
  • Use of Accutane, anti-coagulants, or St. John's Wort
  • Active infections/immunosuppression
  • Herpes 1 or 2 within the treatment area
  • Patients who have undergone LASIK surgery within the past 12 months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Miami Bascom Palmer Eye Institute

Miami, Florida, 33136, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Meibomian Gland DysfunctionDry Eye Syndromes

Interventions

Intense Pulsed Light Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Eyelid DiseasesEye DiseasesLacrimal Apparatus Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhototherapyTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Wendy Lee, MD

    University of Miami Bascom Palmer Eye Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2013

First Posted

August 6, 2013

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion

May 1, 2015

Study Completion

May 1, 2015

Last Updated

June 28, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-06

Locations