Comparison Between iLux™ and LipiFlow® in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
Randomized Comparison Between iLux™ and LipiFlow® in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
1 other identifier
interventional
142
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare changes in meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), tear break-up time (TBT) and evaporative dry eye (EDE) symptoms after treatment with either the iLux® 2020 System or the LipiFlow® Thermal Pulsation System.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 9, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 16, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 20, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 20, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 20, 2019
CompletedApril 12, 2023
May 1, 2019
5 months
February 10, 2017
April 22, 2019
April 10, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Meibomian Gland Score (MGS)
Meibomian glands on the lower eyelid were assessed by the examiner using a Meibomian Gland Evaluator while viewing the eyelid margin using a slit lamp microscope. 5 glands in 3 zones (nasal, medial, temporal) were evaluated. Each gland was scored from 0-3 for a maximum MGS of 45 in each eye. MGS scoring was as follows: 0 = no secretion (worst), 1 = inspissated, 2 = cloudy, 3 = clear liquid (best). A positive change value indicates an improvement.
Baseline, Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Tear Break-Up Time (TBT)
Tear break-up time (defined as the time required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking) was assessed by the examiner using a slit lamp and fluorescein strips. Fluorescein was instilled onto the patient's eye, after which the patient blinked three times, then kept the eye open. Immediately thereafter, the examiner used a stopwatch to record the time between the last blink and the first appearance of a dark spot on the cornea (formation of dry area). Three consecutive measurements were taken and averaged for actual TBT. A positive change value represents a lengthening in the tear break-up time and greater comfort.
Baseline, Week 4
Incidence (Number) of Device- or Procedure-related Adverse Events
The number of device- or procedure-related adverse events was calculated, including changes from baseline (Yes/No) in any of the following eyelid characteristics: lid margin assessment or development of floppy eyelids or entropion (eyelid rolled inward) or ectropion (eyelid sagging outward) or loss of lash integrity.
Week 4
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Baseline, Week 4
Mean Pain Score During Treatment
Baseline (Day 0), Immediately Post-Treatment (Day 0), Day 1 Post-Treatment
Mean Discomfort Score During Treatment
Baseline (Day 0), Immediately Post-Treatment (Day 0), Day 1 Post-Treatment
Change From Baseline to Post-Treatment in Ocular Surface Staining
Baseline (Day 0), Immediately Post-Treatment (Day 0), Day 1 Post-Treatment
Change From Baseline to Post-Treatment in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Baseline (Day 0), Immediately Post-Treatment (Day 0)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
iLux 2020 System
EXPERIMENTALMeibomian gland treatment (Day 0) according to instructions for use (IFU)/User Manual
LipiFlow Thermal Pulsation System
ACTIVE COMPARATORMeibomian gland treatment (Day 0) according to instructions for use (IFU)/User Manual
Interventions
Medical device that applies localized heat and pressure therapy to the eyelid in order to express melted meibum from obstructed glands
Medical device that applies a combination of heat and pressure to the inner eyelid to remove gland obstructions and stagnant gland content
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years and older of any gender or race
- Written informed consent to participate in the study
- Willingness and ability to return for all study visits
- Positive history of self-reported dry eye symptoms for three months prior to the study using OSDI with a score of ≥ 23 at the baseline visit
- Evidence of meibomian gland (MG) obstruction, based on total MGS of ≤12 in lower eyelids for each eye as assessed by a clinician not involved in the study procedure
- Tear break-up time \<10 seconds
- Agreement/ability to abstain from dry eye/MGD medications for the time between the screening visit and the final study visit (ocular lubricants are allowed if no changes are made during the study)
You may not qualify if:
- History of ocular or corneal surgery including intraocular, oculo-plastic, corneal or refractive surgery within 1 year
- Subjects with giant papillary conjunctivitis
- Subject with punctal plugs or who have had punctal cautery
- Ocular injury or trauma, chemical burns, or limbal stem cell deficiency within 3 months of the baseline examination
- Active ocular herpes zoster or simplex of eye or eyelid or a history of these within the last 3 months
- Subjects who are aphakic
- Cicatricial lid margin disease identified via slit lamp examination, including pemphigoid, symblepharon, etc.
- Active ocular infection
- Active ocular inflammation or history of chronic, recurrent ocular inflammation within prior 3 months
- Ocular surface abnormality that may compromise corneal integrity
- Lid surface abnormalities that affect lid function in either eye
- Anterior blepharitis (staphylococcal, demodex or seborrheic grade 3 or 4)
- Systemic disease conditions that cause dry eye
- Unwillingness to abstain from systemic medications known to cause dryness for the study duration
- Women who are pregnant, nursing, or not utilizing adequate birth control measures
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
TearFilm Investigative Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016, United States
TearFilm Investigative Site
Scottsdale, Arizona, 95260, United States
TearFilm Investigative Site
San Diego, California, 92122, United States
TearFilm Investigative Site
Centennial, Colorado, 80112, United States
TearFilm Investigative Site
Greenwood Village, Colorado, 80111, United States
TearFilm Investigative Site
Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017, United States
TearFilm Investigative Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Rob Thornhill
- Organization
- TearFilm Innovations, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Meibomian gland score will be assessed by a masked rater
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2017
First Posted
February 16, 2017
Study Start
February 9, 2017
Primary Completion
July 20, 2017
Study Completion
July 20, 2017
Last Updated
April 12, 2023
Results First Posted
May 20, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share