The Role of Spreader Flaps in Preventing of Nasal Obstruction
1 other identifier
interventional
67
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Nasal obstruction is a preventable complication of rhinoplasty, for which the spreader graft is the gold standard. More recently, the spreader flap technique has been espoused as an alternative to spreader grafting. Herein we evaluated the efficacy of this technique in a randomized trial setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started May 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 24, 2013
CompletedJuly 24, 2013
July 1, 2013
1.5 years
July 11, 2013
July 23, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
acoustic rhinometry ( minimum cross section area)
acoustic rhinomanometery GM (ARI model, U.K) with an ultrasound system 0/8. (US-100, Japan) All tests were done while the patients were sitting while holding the device before his nose, completely sealing the nose, without excessive pressure cause changing of the nasal shape. Reducing the possible mucosal effect on acoustic rhinomanometry results, all tests were performed 10 minutes after the decongestant (Oxymetasoline spray) usage. Finally, a graph was drawn with two notches wherein the first notch related the valve area and the second one related to anterior part of lower turbinate. Each examination consisted of three consecutives tests from which the minimum cross section area was calculated
before surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
acoustic rhinometry ( minimum cross section area)
one year after surgery
Study Arms (2)
spreader flap
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsage of spreader flap of upper lateral cartilage
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONperforming of rhinoplasty without spreader flap
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who underwent rhinoplasty
You may not qualify if:
- revision rhinoplasty
- congenital malformations
- severe allergic rhinitis
- nasal polyposis
- sinusitis
- deviated nose
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Imam Khomeini Hospital
Tehran, Tehran Province, 94305, Iran
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Babak Saaedi
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2013
First Posted
July 24, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion
November 1, 2012
Study Completion
April 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 24, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-07