Satiety Effects of Beef Compared to Beans
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The satiety effects of beef will be compared to beans. Beef is hypothesized to be more satiating than beans.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 20, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2013
CompletedApril 9, 2014
April 1, 2014
5 months
February 20, 2013
April 8, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
satiety
Measure satiety by visual analogue scale (VAS)
180 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
food intake
180 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Bean patty
ACTIVE COMPARATORBean Patty
Beef patty
ACTIVE COMPARATORBeef patty
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- healthy, non-smoking, BMI of 18-27, non-dieting, typically consumes breakfast/lunch
You may not qualify if:
- distaste for beans, vegetarian, current smoker, restrained eating habits, recent weight change, history of significant disease of past medical history, pregnant, lactating irregular menstrual cycle
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Food Science and Nutrition
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55108, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joanne L Slavin, PhD
University of Minnesota
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 20, 2013
First Posted
July 19, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion
August 1, 2013
Study Completion
September 1, 2013
Last Updated
April 9, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04