Evaluation of Cogmed Working Memory Training for Adult Hearing Aid Users
TEACH2
1 other identifier
interventional
57
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A double-blind randomised active-controlled trial aims to assess whether Cogmed (adaptive) working memory training results in improvements in untrained measures of cognition, speech perception and self-reported hearing abilities in older adults (50-74 years) with mild-moderate hearing loss who are existing hearing aid users, compared with an active placebo Cogmed (non-adaptive) control. It is hypothesised that improvements on trained Cogmed tasks, representing increased working memory capacity, will result in improved performance on cognitive and speech perception tasks that engage working memory. We also measure self-reported hearing ability to assess self-perceived benefit of Cogmed training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 3, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 1, 2020
CompletedOctober 1, 2020
September 1, 2020
2.1 years
June 27, 2013
November 10, 2017
September 9, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Letter Monitoring Task
The VLM is a visual task of working memory (Gatehouse, Naylor, \& Elberling, 2006) that is not trained within the Cogmed working memory training program. Ten consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) words are embedded in an 80-letter sequence. Two sequences are presented to participants at each outcome assessment in a counterbalanced order. Individual letters are displayed sequentially on a computer screen at a rate of 2 second per letter (first list) and 1 second per letter (second list). Participants were asked to press the keyboard 'space bar' (hit) when three consecutive letters formed a recognised CVC word (for example, M-A-T). Task performance was scored as the total number of hits (maximum score of ten per list). Higher scores indicate better performance.
0, 2, 7, and (adaptive training group only) 31 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Phonemic Discrimination Probe
0, 2, 7 and (adaptive training group only) 31 weeks
BESST High/Low Context Sentence Intelligibility
0, 2, 7 and (adaptive training group only) 31 weeks
Modified Coordinate Response Measure (MCRM)
0, 2, 7 and (adaptive training group only) 31 weeks
Digit Span Backwards
0, 2, 7 and (adaptive training group only) 31 weeks
Test of Attention in Listening (TAIL)
0, 2, 7 and (adaptive training group only) 31 weeks
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cogmed RM (adaptive)
EXPERIMENTALOnline training intervention: An adaptive version of Cogmed RM working memory training. Task difficulty (number of to-be-remembered items) increases based on individual performance, in order to maintain average daily performance levels of approximately 60% of trials correct. Participants complete 35-45 minutes of active training per day, 5 days a week for 5 weeks.
Cogmed RM (non-adaptive, placebo)
PLACEBO COMPARATOROnline training intervention: A non-adaptive placebo version of Cogmed RM working memory training. Tasks are fixed at a low-difficulty practice level (three to-be-remembered items) and do not increase in difficulty over the course of the intervention. Participants complete 35-45 minutes of active placebo training per day, 5 days a week for 5 weeks.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Existing (3+ months) hearing aid(s) user
- Mild to moderate (PTA0.25-4k Hz 21-69 dB HL) sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in the better hearing ear (SNHL defined as air-bone gap across 0.5k, 1k \& 2k Hz \< 15 dB)
- Internet access at home
You may not qualify if:
- Participation in a previous training intervention study
- First language other than English (all speech outcome measure are presented in English)
- Unable to use either a desktop or laptop computer (Cogmed RM working memory training is delivered via the internet using a desktop or laptop computer)
- Cognitive impairment as defined as a score of less than 26/30 (fail) on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
QMC Ropewalk House
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG1 5DU, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Henshaw H, Heinrich A, Tittle A, Ferguson M. Cogmed Training Does Not Generalize to Real-World Benefits for Adult Hearing Aid Users: Results of a Blinded, Active-Controlled Randomized Trial. Ear Hear. 2022 May/Jun;43(3):741-763. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001096.
PMID: 34524150DERIVEDHenshaw H, Ferguson MA. Working memory training for adult hearing aid users: study protocol for a double-blind randomized active controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Dec 5;14:417. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-417.
PMID: 24304745DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Helen Henshaw
- Organization
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Helen Henshaw, PhD
NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham.
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Melanie Ferguson, BSc (Hons)
NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blinding
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2013
First Posted
July 3, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
October 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 1, 2020
Results First Posted
October 1, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09