A Randomized Controlled Trial of Open Surgical vs. Rapid, Minimally-invasive Voluntary Adult Male Circumcision
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To identify a minimally-invasive surgical circumcision technique for men, which is easy to learn and perform, is safe, and is associated with high patient satisfaction and excellent cosmetic results.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 13, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 6, 2014
CompletedOctober 2, 2018
September 1, 2018
2 months
June 11, 2013
October 29, 2013
September 4, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intraoperative Duration
Amount of time from first manipulation of tissue under local anesthesia to dressing
1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Difficulty in Learning and Performing Technique
1 year
Number of Participants With Complete Wound Healing by Post-Surgery Week 4
Within 4 weeks after surgery
Pain Experienced
Within 2 days after surgery
Overall Patient Satisfaction
Within 6 weeks after surgery
Cosmetic Result
Within 6 weeks after surgery
Other Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Open surgical circumcision
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe open surgical technique, which is commonly used for circumcision in South Africa, requires good surgical skills and minor complications are common.
Unicirc device with tissue adhesive
EXPERIMENTALCoupling removal of the foreskin using the disposable Unicirc device with wound sealing using tissue adhesive results in a procedure that can be performed by generalist doctors with minimal training.
Interventions
Open surgical circumcision using a technique approved by the WHO (dorsal slit)
Removal of foreskin with Unicirc disposal device and wound sealing with tissue adhesive.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy men at least 18 years of age requesting circumcision
- No anatomical penile abnormalities or infections
- Able to provide informed consent to participate
- Willing to participate in follow-up visits
You may not qualify if:
- Current illness
- Penile abnormality or infection which contraindicates or would complicate circumcision
- History of bleeding disorder
- Past reaction to local anesthetic
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Simunye Primary Healthcare
Mitchells Plain, Western Cape, South Africa
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Peter Millard
- Organization
- University of New England
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter S Millard, MD, PhD
Simunye Primary Health Care
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PI
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2013
First Posted
June 13, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
August 1, 2013
Study Completion
August 1, 2013
Last Updated
October 2, 2018
Results First Posted
February 6, 2014
Record last verified: 2018-09