Circumcision With a Novel Disposable Device in Chinese Children: a Hospital-based Randomized Controlled Trail
1 other identifier
interventional
120
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Circumcision, a removal of the foreskin, is performed commonly at any age in male worldwide. Globally over 25% of men are circumcised. In the Middle East, circumcision is even performed routinely in every male newborn. The benefits from it vastly outweigh the risks. Gradually, more and more Chinese male are willing to undergo it with themselves and their sons. But there are also some complications with circumcision, such as pain, edema, infection, and hemorrhage. Considering of that, physicians continually manage to improve their surgical methods and analgesic techniques. In the study of Peng, a disposable minimally invasive circumcision anastomosis device named Shenghuan (China Wuhu Snnda Medical Treatment Application Technology Co. Ltd.) (ShD) was introduced to be applied in circumcision. And they concluded that method was quicker, safer and less pain than the conventional techniques of incision. In present study, we carry out a randomized controlled trail, using a different method as Peng introduced with this device in children's circumcision (Yan's), compared with the method as Peng used and the conventional technique in our hospital, and then observe the outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jul 2009
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2011
CompletedApril 10, 2013
April 1, 2013
1.9 years
November 18, 2011
April 8, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
operation time
within operation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
pain score
within operation
Study Arms (3)
Group I
EXPERIMENTALGroup II
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup III
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The foreskin is first separated from the glans.Then the inner ring is placed between them and over the glans. After adjusting the position of inner ring to retain 0.5cm inner foreskin, the operator install the outer ring over the foreskin and combine them together. Removal of excess foreskin is then performed upon the device.
The foreskin is first separated from the glans. Then the inner ring is placed on the outer layer of foreskin. Next, the rim of the foreskin is clamped with blood vessel forceps at the 3, 6, 9 and 12 o'clock points. An urologist and an assistant each hold two clamps to widen the opening of the foreskin, and pull it over the inner ring. After the inner and outer layers of the foreskin and the frenulum are symmetrically positioned, the assistant install the outer ring over the foreskin and gently combine it together. Removal of excess foreskin is then performed below the device.
The procedure of conventional circumcision involve transection of the excess foreskin with reservation of 0.5cm inner foreskin, haemostasis by electrocautery and suture of skin edges with 4-0 absorption sutures.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children with phimosis or redundant prepuce
You may not qualify if:
- Children with genital tract infection or deformity,
- congenital diseases,
- hematological diseases,
- or other general diseases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Feng Panlead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Attending Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2011
First Posted
November 22, 2011
Study Start
July 1, 2009
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2011
Last Updated
April 10, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-04