NCT01865955

Brief Summary

Pre-procedural ultrasound for Spinal \& Epidural anesthesia is now being increasingly performed worldwide. Pre-procedural ultrasound assessment of the spine has been shown to facilitate the placement of epidural anesthesia in pregnant women, diagnostic lumbar punctures, performance of spinal anesthesia in non-obstetric patients and accurate identification of the interspace at which the puncture is being performed. This is especially important during spinal anesthesia, where puncture below the ending of the spinal cord is recommended for safety. The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of spinal anesthesia between the pre-procedural ultrasound assessment of the spine and the traditional palpatory technique, in term pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Furthermore, we aim to describe sonoanatomic features of the spine that could predict the ease of insertion of spinal anesthesia in that patient population. We hypothesize that in term pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean delivery, pre-procedural ultrasound assessment of the spine will improve the success rate of spinal anesthesia at first attempt, compared to the traditional palpatory technique.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable pregnancy

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pregnancy

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2013

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 28, 2013

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 31, 2013

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2014

Status Verified

January 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

May 28, 2013

Last Update Submit

January 30, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

UltrasoundSpinal anesthesiaCesarean section

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Spinal needle redirections

    Number of redirections needed to perform a successful spinal puncture (presence of cerebrospinal fluid). A needle redirection is defined as any change in needle insertion trajectory that did not involve complete withdrawal of the needle from the patient's skin. The first needle pass will not be considered a redirection.

    15 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Needle reinsertions

    15 minutes

  • Need to change to another interspace.

    15 minutes

  • Procedure time

    15 minutes

  • Pain score

    15 minutes

  • Intervertebral level agreement

    3 hours

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Palpation

NO INTERVENTION

Palpation will be used to determine placement of the spinal needle.

Ultrasound

EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound will be used prior to placement of the spinal needle.

Procedure: UltrasoundDevice: The spinal needle

Interventions

UltrasoundPROCEDURE

Ultrasound applied to the lumbar region to determine spinal needle placement.

Ultrasound
Ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Pregnant patients scheduled to receive spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean sections
  • ASA physical status 1 - 3
  • Written informed consent
  • Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient's refusal.
  • Body mass index ≥ 45
  • Patient with marked spinal bony deformity (Severe scoliosis on visual inspection and previous spinal instrumentation).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mount Sinai Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5G1X5, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

High-Energy Shock Waves

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ultrasonic WavesSoundRadiation, NonionizingRadiationPhysical Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Cristian Arzola, MD

    MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2013

First Posted

May 31, 2013

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion

October 1, 2013

Study Completion

October 1, 2013

Last Updated

February 3, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-01

Locations