Does Ultrasound Help With Placement of Labor Analgesia in Pregnant Patients?
Does Ultrasound-guided CSE Technique Improve Midline Placement of Epidural Needle With Positive CSF Flow, Thereby Facilitating Correct Placement of the Catheter Compared to Catheter Placement Using Palpation of Anatomical Landmarks?
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators believe that ultrasound guided CSE technique will accurately place the epidural needle in the midline position compared to epidural needle placement via palpation of anatomical landmarks. This will result in positive CSF in the spinal needle, correct placement of the catheter, and adequate symmetrical labor analgesia/anesthesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable pregnancy
Started May 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 13, 2018
CompletedFebruary 13, 2018
February 1, 2018
1.8 years
July 31, 2014
May 10, 2017
February 12, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Accurate Epidural Placement
Number of ultrasound guided CSE technique accurately placed epidural needle in the midline position
2 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Successful First Attempt
Immediate
Number of Participants Without Angle Adjustments in Space Success
immediate
Study Arms (2)
Use of Ultrasound
ACTIVE COMPARATORWoman requests epidural for pain relief Ultrasound guided CSE placed Continuous epidural infusion started Infusion 12 ml/hr of 0.0625% Bupivacaine and Fentanyl 2mcg/ml
No ultrasound used
ACTIVE COMPARATORPalpation of anatomical landmarks Woman requests epidural for pain relief CSE placed using palpation of anatomical landmarks Continuous epidural infusion started Infusion 12 ml/hr of 0.0625% Bupivacaine and Fentanyl 2mcg/ml
Interventions
The ultrasound imaging of the lumbar spine in different scanning planes facilitates the identification of the landmarks necessary for appropriate epidural space location in pregnant patients. There are two acoustic windows that are effective for lumbar spine sonographic assessment: one seen on the transverse approach, and the other seen on the longitudinal paramedian approach. The ultrasound single-screen method using the transverse approach of the lumbar spine provides reliable information regarding the landmarks required for labor epidurals. The correct interspace and midline position are identified for correct placement of the CSE analgesia.
Palpation of anatomical landmarks is used for placement of labor analgesia
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Nulliparious
- Term (\>37 weeks gestation)
- Vertex presentation
- Singleton gestation
- Ability to provide informed consent
- Request for analgesia for labor pain
- Maternal age 18 years or greater
You may not qualify if:
- Multiparous
- Preterm (\< 37 weeks gestation)
- Presentation other than vertex (breech, transverse)
- Active drug/alcohol dependence
- Previous spinal surgeries
- Known spinal deformities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mount-Sinai Roosevelt hospital
New York, New York, 10019, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Barbara Orlando MD and PI
- Organization
- Mount Sinai West
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Migdalia Saloum, MD
Mount Sinai Roosevelt Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2014
First Posted
August 4, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 1, 2015
Study Completion
February 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 13, 2018
Results First Posted
February 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share