NCT01858493

Brief Summary

To determine whether women exposed to the continence promotion intervention will report improved urinary symptoms and quality of life, and lower incontinence-related stigma and falls than women who receive a control intervention at one-year post-intervention.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
910

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
3 countries

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2013

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 14, 2013

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 21, 2013

Completed
4.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

July 24, 2017

Status Verified

July 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

4.2 years

First QC Date

May 14, 2013

Last Update Submit

July 20, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Urinary incontinenceFallsQuality of lifeStigmaCommunity-dwelling older womenContinence promotion

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Self-reported improvement in urinary incontinence

    Patient global impression of improvement questionnaire Sandvik severity index ICIQ-FLUTS

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Falls

    1 year

  • Reduction in incontinence related stigma and quality of life

    1 year

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Cost-utility of the continence promotion intervention

    1-year

Study Arms (2)

Continence promotion group education

EXPERIMENTAL

A single 1-hour continence promotion group education workshop, facilitated by the research coordinator, aimed at changing knowledge and beliefs about urinary incontinence and different treatment options. An evidence-based self-management tool will be distributed at the end of the workshop.

Behavioral: Continence promotion group education workshop

Sham health lecture

SHAM COMPARATOR

A single 1-hour group education workshop on other health topics of concern to older women such as memory, hearing, insomnia

Behavioral: Sham health lecture

Interventions

Interactive group education workshop promoting continence

Continence promotion group education

Interactive group education workshop about general health

Sham health lecture

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women
  • years and older
  • Urinary incontinence at least once weekly

You may not qualify if:

  • Living in residential or long-term care
  • Received treatment for incontinence within the past year
  • Dementia or other neurological conditions that preclude the ability to provide -Informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2P4, Canada

Location

Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal

Montreal, Quebec, H3W1W5, Canada

Location

Université de Poitiers

Poitiers, Poitou-Charentes, 86000, France

Location

University of Brunel

Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Agnew R, van den Heuvel E, Tannenbaum C. Efficiency of using community organisations as catalysts for recruitment to continence promotion trials. Clin Trials. 2013 Feb;10(1):151-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774512460144. Epub 2012 Oct 5.

    PMID: 23043154BACKGROUND
  • Tannenbaum C, Agnew R, Benedetti A, Thomas D, van den Heuvel E. Effectiveness of continence promotion for older women via community organisations: a cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 10;3(12):e004135. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004135.

    PMID: 24334159BACKGROUND
  • Drahota A, Udell JE, Mackenzie H, Pugh MT. Psychological and educational interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 3;10(10):CD013480. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013480.pub2.

  • Tannenbaum C, van den Heuvel E, Fritel X, Southall K, Jutai J, Rajabali S, Wagg A. Continence Across Continents To Upend Stigma and Dependency (CACTUS-D): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Dec 10;16:565. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1099-x.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary IncontinenceSocial Stigma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urination DisordersUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesLower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSocial BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Cara Tannenbaum, MD. MSc

    Univeristé de Montréal

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Adrian Wagg, MD

    University of Alberta

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Eleanor van den Heuvel, PhD

    Brunel University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Xavier Fritel, MD, PhD

    University of Poitiers

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2013

First Posted

May 21, 2013

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion

July 1, 2017

Study Completion

July 1, 2017

Last Updated

July 24, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-07

Locations